IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What We Do not Know about the Ownership Structure of the Largest U.S. Companies?
[Чего Мы Не Знаем О Структуре Собственности Крупнейших Компаний Сша?]

Author

Listed:
  • Kokoreva, Maria S. (Кокорева, Мария)

    () (Corporate Finance Center, National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Stepanova, Anastasia N. (Степанова, Анастасия)

    () (Corporate Finance Center, National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Karnoukhova, Elena V. (Карноухова, Елена)

    () (Corporate Finance Center, National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

The recent restructuring of the economy has led to the fact that the leaders of information technology sector — Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon — became the largest companies in the world, replacing the banking and oil and gas sectors. The emergence of a large number of technology start-ups resulted in the increase of the entrepreneurial ownership. Business founders tend to issue dual class stocks to retain control over key corporate decisions. The capital structure and the Board of Directors structure alter along with changes in the ownership structure. In many large companies, more than 90% of directors have become independent. At the same time, the diversification of the board of directors is improving by the active involvement of women in decisionmaking processes. Zero debt popularity reflect the changes in the attitude to risk. The article examines the main trends in the ownership structure of the largest US companies. The research consolidates the results of theoretical and empirical research in the field of corporate governance, capital structure and ownership structure in the developed markets. We provide the analysis of the dispersed ownership as the element of AngloSaxon corporate governance model based on historical trends in the ownership structure of companies in the US. The appearance of new sectors, the rapid development of entrepreneurial ownership, the return of the popularity of dual class shares, the fashion for gender diversification in the board of directors and the phenomenon of zero debt level are illustrated by case studies of actual corporations and analytical reports. We discuss all of the identified trends in terms of risk. In order to hedge the higher business risks of new sectors the top management and investors reduce debt, invite women to the board of directors and increase the degree of independence of the board of directors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kokoreva, Maria S. (Кокорева, Мария) & Stepanova, Anastasia N. (Степанова, Анастасия) & Karnoukhova, Elena V. (Карноухова, Елена), 2016. "What We Do not Know about the Ownership Structure of the Largest U.S. Companies?
    [Чего Мы Не Знаем О Структуре Собственности Крупнейших Компаний Сша?]
    ," Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 36-59, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://w82.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1662.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frieden, Rob, 2017. "The Mixed Blessing in Subsidized Internet Access," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168481, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Barclay, Michael J. & Holderness, Clifford G., 1989. "Private benefits from control of public corporations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 371-395, December.
    3. anonymous, 2006. "Restructuring of Federal Reserve check processing operations in the Sixth District, Regulation CC," News, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), number 2006rofrcpoitsr.
    4. Douglas Clement, 2004. "Welcome to retirement. Now back to work," Fedgazette, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, issue Mar, pages 8-10.
    5. Musa Gambo Sharifai & Zakari Uba, 2017. "Investigating the Use of Value Analysis and Value Engineering as Cost Saving Techniques among Selected Manufacturing Companies in Kano State Nigeria," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(4), pages 34-39, 04-2017.
    6. Chiara Franco & Sandro Montresor & Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti, 2009. "On indirect trade-related R&D spillovers: the role of the international trade network," Openloc Working Papers 0901, Public policies and local development.
    7. Matthias Aistleitner & Marianne Fölker & Jakob Kapeller, 2015. "Die Macht der Wissenschaftsstatistik und die Entwicklung der Ökonomie," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 135(2), pages 111-132.
    8. Christophe Jalil Nordman & Jann Lay & Ousman Koriko & Flore Gubert & Michael Grimm, 2010. "La solidarité forcée bride-t-elle l'activité des micro-entrepreneurs ? Une analyse à partir de données ouest-africaines," Post-Print hal-01521961, HAL.
    9. Orazem, Peter & Glewwe, Paul & Patrinos, Harry, 2007. "The Benefits and Costs of Alternative Strategies to Improve Educational Outcomes," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12853, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Johan Hombert & Jérôme Pouyet & Nicolas Schutz, 2009. "Anticompetitive vertical mergers waves," PSE Working Papers hal-00440143, HAL.
    11. repec:qba:annpro:v:20:y:2010:id:865 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Donald Zimmerman, 1998. "Commentary on ‘Science, Measurement, and Validity: Is Completion of Samuel Messick's Synthesis Possible?’ by Keith A. Markus," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 69-72, November.
    13. Du, Bin & Hu, Eric & Kolhe, Mohan, 2012. "Performance analysis of water cooled concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(9), pages 6732-6736.
    14. Clifford G. Holderness, 2009. "The Myth of Diffuse Ownership in the United States," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(4), pages 1377-1408, April.
    15. Pina, José M. & Dall'Olmo Riley, Francesca & Lomax, Wendy, 2013. "Generalizing spillover effects of goods and service brand extensions: A meta-analysis approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1411-1419.
    16. K. Aristotelous, 2002. "The impact of the post-1972 floating exchange-rate regime on US exports," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(13), pages 1627-1632.
    17. David A. Carter & Betty J. Simkins & W. Gary Simpson, 2003. "Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 38(1), pages 33-53, February.
    18. DeAngelo, Harry & DeAngelo, Linda, 1985. "Managerial ownership of voting rights : A study of public corporations with dual classes of common stock," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 33-69, March.
    19. repec:oup:jcomle:v:11:y:2015:i:1:p:145-163. is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ownership structure; capital structure; risk level; the Board of Directors; ownership concentration;

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.