IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rar/journl/0224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural Areas and Agricultural Holdings in China: What Has Changed Within Ten Years from the 1996 to the 2006?

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Fanfani
  • Nica Claudia Calò

Abstract

The aim of this article is to outline the main effects of the 1978 agricultural reform and the consequent shift from collective land utilization to family household management (Household Responsibility System). Specific focus will be on the structural changes occurring in rural areas and on the significant differences among the rural areas in all the Chinese provinces. We will investigate the relevance of these structural changes and their effects on both rural and urban areas. The analysis will be based on data from the first (1996) and second (2006) national agricultural census of China.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Fanfani & Nica Claudia Calò, 2011. "Rural Areas and Agricultural Holdings in China: What Has Changed Within Ten Years from the 1996 to the 2006?," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 4, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rar:journl:0224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=44262&Tipo=Articolo%20PDF&lingua=en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gale, H. Frederick, Jr. & Lohmar, Bryan & Tuan, Francis C., 2009. "How Tightly Has China Embraced Market Reforms in Agriculture?," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pages 1-6, June.
    2. Ho, Peter, 2005. "Institutions in Transition: Land Ownership, Property Rights, and Social Conflict in China," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199280698, Decembrie.
    3. World Bank, 2008. "The World Bank Annual Report 2008," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7524.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongchun Yang & Deli Zhang & Qingmin Meng & Corrin McCarn, 2015. "Urban Residential Land Use Reconstruction under Dual-Track Mechanism of Market Socialism in China: A Case Study of Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Tansel, Aysit & Karaoglan, Deniz, 2014. "Health behaviors and education in Turkey," MPRA Paper 57322, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jul 2014.
    3. Maxwell, Daniel & Webb, Patrick & Coates, Jennifer & Wirth, James, 2010. "Fit for purpose? Rethinking food security responses in protracted humanitarian crises," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 91-97, April.
    4. Slavtcheva, Dessislava, 2015. "Financial development, exchange rate regimes and productivity growth: Theory and evidence," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 109-123.
    5. Muhongayire, Wivine, 2012. "An Economic Assessment of the Factors Influencing Smallholder Farmers' Access to Formal Credit: A Case Study of Rwamagana District, Rwanda," Research Theses 198522, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    6. Bategeka, Lawrence & Kiiza, Julius & Kasirye, Ibrahim, 2013. "Institutional Constraints to Agriculture Development in Uganda," Research Series 159668, Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC).
    7. Xianlei Ma & Justus Wesseler & Nico Heerink & Futian Qu, 2013. "Land Tenure Reforms and Land Conservation Investments in China ¨C What Does Real Option Value Theory Tell Us?," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 3, pages 19-33, August.
    8. Claude Ménard & Aleksandra Peeroo, 2011. "Liberalization in the Water Sector: Three Leading Models," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Yaninee Songkajorn & Natcha Thawesaengskulthai, 2014. "Medical Device Innovation Development Process," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(04), pages 1-24.
    10. Koffi M. Adji & Aklesso Y. G. Egbendewe & Boris O. K. Lokonon, 2022. "Potential impacts of sustainable agricultural practices on smallholders' behavior in developing countries: Evidence from Togo," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(1), pages 73-87, February.
    11. Ran Liu & Tai-Chee Wong & Shenghe Liu, 2012. "Peasants' Counterplots against the State Monopoly of the Rural Urbanization Process: Urban Villages and ‘Small Property Housing’ in Beijing, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(5), pages 1219-1240, May.
    12. Weiwei Wang & Lihua Zhou & Guojing Yang & Yan Sun & Yong Chen, 2019. "Prohibited Grazing Policy Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction in Rural Northwest China—A Case Study in Yanchi County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Völker, Marc & Tongruksawattana, Songporne & Hardeweg, Bernd & Waibel, Hermann, 2011. "Climate risk perception and ex-ante mitigation strategies of rural households in Thailand and Vietnam," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 79, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    14. Amel Chatti & Salma Dammak Ayadi & Maher Jeriji, 2024. "IPSAS Adoption in African Countries: Talking or Walking the Talk," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 23(3), pages 530-550, September.
    15. Xu Guangdong, 2013. "Property Rights, Law, and Economic Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 117-142, July.
    16. Wesseh, Presley K. & Zoumara, Babette, 2012. "Causal independence between energy consumption and economic growth in Liberia: Evidence from a non-parametric bootstrapped causality test," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 518-527.
    17. Estache, Antonio & Iimi, Atsushi, 2011. "(Un)bundling infrastructure procurement: Evidence from water supply and sewage projects," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 104-114, June.
    18. Norman Long & Jinlong Liu, 2009. "The Centrality of Actors and Interfaces in the Understanding of New Ruralities: A Chinese Case Study," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 38(4), pages 63-84.
    19. Antonio Estache & Atsushi Iimi, 2010. "Bidder Asymmetry in Infrastructure Procurement: Are There any Fringe Bidders?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 36(2), pages 163-187, March.
    20. Ab-Rahim, Rossazana & Selvarajan, Sonia Kumari & Md Noor, Nor Ghani & Affizzah Awang Marikan, Dayang, 2018. "Convergence Clubs of Economic Liberalization in ASEAN, China, and India," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 52(3), pages 129-141.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Chinese rural areas; Rural development; Chinese agriculture; Chinese farms; Household and non-household holdings; Rural migration;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R20 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - General
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rar:journl:0224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rossiea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.