IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v14y2024i4p50-d1373300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Productivity at Home: The Role of Smart Work and Organizational Support in the Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Barbieri

    (Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Marina Mondo

    (Department of Pedagogy Psychology and Philosophy, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Silvia De Simone

    (Department of Pedagogy Psychology and Philosophy, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Roberta Pinna

    (Department of Economics and Business, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Maura Galletta

    (Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09042 Monserrato, Italy)

  • Jessica Pileri

    (Department of Dynamic Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy)

  • Diego Bellini

    (Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

Abstract

In recent years, Italian Public Administrations (PAs) have swiftly adapted to flexible work arrangements due to the impact of COVID-19. The flexible work has led to addressing new challenges including the need to balance work demands with family commitments, a lack of social support, struggles with inadequate technology, and managing home interruptions that negatively affect home performance. Based on the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, the present study aims at examining the negative impact of home interruptions on smart working performance and the moderating role of two potential job resources: organizational support and perceived quality of the smart working. A convenience sample of 301 Italian public employees engaged in smart working completed an online questionnaire. Multivariate regression analysis results showed that organizational support plays a moderating role in reducing the negative effect of interruptions on home performance. However, the findings did not support a moderating role for the perceived quality of smart working. Overall, these findings highlight the critical role of social factors in buffering the negative effects of smart working, as compared to the quality of the technological arrangements. This information could be valuable for organizations looking to enhance the effectiveness of smart working by focusing on organizational support.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Barbieri & Marina Mondo & Silvia De Simone & Roberta Pinna & Maura Galletta & Jessica Pileri & Diego Bellini, 2024. "Enhancing Productivity at Home: The Role of Smart Work and Organizational Support in the Public Sector," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:50-:d:1373300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/4/50/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/4/50/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prodanova, Jana & Kocarev, Ljupco, 2021. "Is job performance conditioned by work-from-home demands and resources?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Maria Lidia Mascia & Mirian Agus & Łukasz Tomczyk & Natale Salvatore Bonfiglio & Diego Bellini & Maria Pietronilla Penna, 2023. "Smartphone Distraction: Italian Validation of the Smartphone Distraction Scale (SDS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Zahoor, Nadia & Donbesuur, Francis & Christofi, Michael & Miri, Domnan, 2022. "Technological innovation and employee psychological well-being: The moderating role of employee learning orientation and perceived organizational support," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Côté, Karine & Lauzier, Martin & Stinglhamber, Florence, 2021. "The relationship between presenteeism and job satisfaction: A mediated moderation model using work engagement and perceived organizational support," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 270-278.
    5. Benlian, Alexander, 2020. "A Daily Field Investigation of Technology-Driven Stress Spillovers from Work to Home," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 113238, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    6. Clara De Vincenzi & Martina Pansini & Bruna Ferrara & Ilaria Buonomo & Paula Benevene, 2022. "Consequences of COVID-19 on Employees in Remote Working: Challenges, Risks and Opportunities An Evidence-Based Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Luis Garicano & Paul Heaton, 2010. "Information Technology, Organization, and Productivity in the Public Sector: Evidence from Police Departments," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(1), pages 167-201, January.
    8. Sophie Leroy & Theresa M. Glomb, 2018. "Tasks Interrupted: How Anticipating Time Pressure on Resumption of an Interrupted Task Causes Attention Residue and Low Performance on Interrupting Tasks and How a “Ready-to-Resume” Plan Mitigates the," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 380-397, June.
    9. Silvia De Simone & Jessica Pileri & Marina Mondo & Max Rapp-Ricciardi & Barbara Barbieri, 2022. "Mea Culpa! The Role of Guilt in the Work-Life Interface and Satisfaction of Women Entrepreneur," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Maria Christina Meyers & Dorien Kooij & Brigitte Kroon & Renee Reuver & Marianne Woerkom, 2020. "Organizational Support for Strengths Use, Work Engagement, and Contextual Performance: The Moderating Role of Age," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(2), pages 485-502, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristian Bartolucci & Francesco Devicienti, 2012. "Better Workers Move to Better Firms: A Simple Test to Identify Sorting," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 259, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    2. Nicholas Bloom & Luis Garicano & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2859-2885, December.
    3. Chien-Chung Huang & Bin Tu & Huiyu Zhang & Jamie Huang, 2022. "Mindfulness Practice and Job Performance in Social Workers: Mediation Effect of Work Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Blesse, Sebastian & Diegmann, André, 2022. "The place-based effects of police stations on crime: Evidence from station closures," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    5. Helen Simpson, 2009. "Productivity In Public Services," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 250-276, April.
    6. Cheng, Wenya & Morrow, John & Tacharoen, Kitjawat, 2012. "Productivity as if space mattered: an application to factor markets across China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 48930, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. César Torres-Martín & Inmaculada Alemany-Arrebola & Manuel Enrique Lorenzo-Martín & Ángel Custodio Mingorance-Estrada, 2021. "Psychological Distress and Psychosocial Factors in the Non-Formal Context of Basketball Coaches in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Ali Merima & Shifa Abdulaziz B. & Shimeles Abebe & Woldeyes Firew, 2017. "Working Paper 290 - Building Fiscal Capacity The role of ICT," Working Paper Series 2404, African Development Bank.
    9. Merima Ali & Abdulaziz B. Shifa & Abebe Shimeles & Firew Woldeyes, 2021. "Building Fiscal Capacity in Developing Countries: Evidence on the Role of Information Technology," National Tax Journal, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(3), pages 591-620.
    10. Sebastian Seibel & Judith Volmer, 2021. "A Diary Study on Anticipated Leisure Time, Morning Recovery, and Employees’ Work Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.
    11. Luqman, Adeel & Talwar, Shalini & Masood, Ayesha & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Does enterprise social media use promote employee creativity and well-being?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 40-54.
    12. Jordi Blanes i Vidal & Tom Kirchmaier, 2015. "The Effect of Police Response Time on Crime Detection," CEP Discussion Papers dp1376, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    13. Luis Garicano & Luis Rayo, 2016. "Why Organizations Fail: Models and Cases," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(1), pages 137-192, March.
    14. Sui, Anna & Sui, Wuyou, 2021. "Not getting the message: Critiquing current conceptualizations of nomophobia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Pilar Cuadrado & Enrique Moral-Benito & Irune Solera, 2020. "A sectoral anatomy of the spanish productivity puzzle," Occasional Papers 2006, Banco de España.
    16. Francesco Aiello & Paola Cardamone & Valeria Pupo, 2019. "New evidence on the firm-university linkages in Europe. The role of meritocratic management practices," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 813-828, November.
    17. Alda, Erik, 2020. "The effects of body-worn cameras on police efficiency: A study of local police agencies in the US," MPRA Paper 103994, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Clara De Vincenzi & Martina Pansini & Bruna Ferrara & Ilaria Buonomo & Paula Benevene, 2022. "Consequences of COVID-19 on Employees in Remote Working: Challenges, Risks and Opportunities An Evidence-Based Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Aurelio Bruzzo, 2016. "Theoretical references for the territorial delimitation of Regions," Argomenti, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics, vol. 3(3), pages 1-26, January-A.
    20. Cristian Bartolucci & Francesco Devicienti & Ignacio Monzón, 2018. "Identifying Sorting in Practice," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 408-438, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:50-:d:1373300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.