IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p7067-d1717272.html

Sustainable Work–Life Balance, Social Support, and Workload: Exploring the Potential Dual Role of Flexible Work in a Moderated Mediation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Bellini

    (Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09121 Sardinia, Italy)

  • Barbara Barbieri

    (Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09121 Sardinia, Italy)

  • Marina Mondo

    (Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, 09123 Sardinia, Italy)

  • Silvia De Simone

    (Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, 09123 Sardinia, Italy)

  • Silvia Marocco

    (Department of Psychology of Development and Socialization Processes, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Flexible work arrangements have the potential to enhance work–life balance and contribute to more sustainable work environments. However, they may also increase fatigue and lead to greater work–life conflict (WLC). This study offers a novel contribution by examining the relationship between flexible work arrangements—focusing in particular on the cognitive demands of flexible work (CDFW), which encompass the task structuring, scheduling of working times, planning of working place, and coordination with others—and WLC. Specifically, the study investigates the mediating role of workload in this relationship. Furthermore, it also explores whether perceived organizational support (POS) moderates the indirect relationships between CDFW and WLC, within the framework of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Data were collected from a sample of 419 employees in the Italian public sector. The study also controls for potential confounding variables, such as age, gender, duration of employment in public administration, and weekly working hours, to account for their influence on work–life balance and workload. The results highlight a significant positive relationship between planning of the working place and WLC. Additionally, workload plays a mediating role between CDFW subdimensions and WLC. However, POS does not moderate the mediated relationship between CDFW and WLC.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Bellini & Barbara Barbieri & Marina Mondo & Silvia De Simone & Silvia Marocco, 2025. "Sustainable Work–Life Balance, Social Support, and Workload: Exploring the Potential Dual Role of Flexible Work in a Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7067-:d:1717272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7067/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7067/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Petitta & Valerio Ghezzi, 2025. "Disentangling the Pros and Cons of Flexible Work Arrangements: Curvilinear Effects on Individual and Organizational Outcomes," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Deniz Yucel & Wen Fan, 2023. "Workplace flexibility, work–family interface, and psychological distress: differences by family caregiving obligations and gender," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1825-1847, August.
    3. Annum Tariq Maan & Ghulam Abid & Tahira Hassan Butt & Fouzia Ashfaq & Saira Ahmed, 2020. "Perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of proactive personality and psychological empowerment," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Anya Johnson & Shanta Dey & Helena Nguyen & Markus Groth & Sadhbh Joyce & Leona Tan & Nicholas Glozier & Samuel B Harvey, 2020. "A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 402-424, August.
    5. Liyuan Wang & Tianyi Xie, 2023. "Double-Edged Sword Effect of Flexible Work Arrangements on Employee Innovation Performance: From the Demands–Resources–Individual Effects Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Carla Mascarenhas & Anderson Rei Galvão & Carla Susana Marques, 2022. "How Perceived Organizational Support, Identification with Organization and Work Engagement Influence Job Satisfaction: A Gender-Based Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Sophie-Charlotte Meyer & Lena Hünefeld, 2018. "Challenging Cognitive Demands at Work, Related Working Conditions, and Employee Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Barbara Barbieri & Marina Mondo & Silvia De Simone & Roberta Pinna & Maura Galletta & Jessica Pileri & Diego Bellini, 2024. "Enhancing Productivity at Home: The Role of Smart Work and Organizational Support in the Public Sector," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Florentina Madalina Perevoznic & Voicu D. Dragomir, 2024. "Achieving the 2030 Agenda: Mapping the Landscape of Corporate Sustainability Goals and Policies in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-54, April.
    10. Groen, Bianca A.C. & van Triest, Sander P. & Coers, Michael & Wtenweerde, Neeke, 2018. "Managing flexible work arrangements: Teleworking and output controls," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 727-735.
    11. Loredana Mihalca & Tudor Irimias & Gabriela Brendea, 2021. "Teleworking During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Determining Factors of Perceived Work Productivity, Job Performance, and Satisfaction," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 620-620, August.
    12. Maral Babapour Chafi & Annemarie Hultberg & Nina Bozic Yams, 2021. "Post-Pandemic Office Work: Perceived Challenges and Opportunities for a Sustainable Work Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huan Minh Nguyen & Bui Van Hoai Nam & To Tran Thanh Truc & Nguyen Vu Thao Ngan, 2025. "Predictors of Employees’ Organizational Commitment: The Moderating Effect of Supervisor Accessibility in Ho Chi Minh City’s Travel Agencies," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
    2. Monica Aureliana Petcu & Maria Iulia Sobolevschi-David & Raluca Florentina Crețu & Stefania Cristina Curea & Anca Maria Hristea & Mihaela Diana Oancea-Negescu & Daniela Tutui, 2023. "Telework: A Social and Emotional Perspective of the Impact on Employees’ Wellbeing in the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Magdalena Inglot, 2025. "Generation Z and Work Efficiency: Identifying Barriers and Factors Limiting Professional Effectiveness," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 961-976.
    4. Ruth Bhekekile Shandu & Thokozani Ian Nzimakwe & Reward Utete, 2024. "Analysing the effects of flexible working conditions in the workplace: An exploratory study," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 6(6), pages 109-120, December.
    5. Byung-Jik Kim & Julak Lee, 2024. "The mental health implications of artificial intelligence adoption: the crucial role of self-efficacy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Robert Edric Josef R. Lizares & Maria Assunta C. Cuyegkeng, 2024. "Building sustainable organizations online: How leaders embed sustainability into organizational culture in virtual contexts," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6434-6448, December.
    7. Gabriel Cachón‐Rodríguez & Alicia Blanco‐González & Francisco Díez‐Martín & Leonardo Ortegón, 2025. "From Corporate Social Responsibility to Employee Mental Well‐Being: The Differential Role of Social and Psychological Capital in Companies' Rural Depopulation Areas," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 5606-5620, July.
    8. Jinan Fattah & Mehmet Yesiltas & Tarik Atan, 2022. "The Impact of Knowledge Sharing and Participative Decision-Making on Employee Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    9. Canan Sezenler & Mehmet Aga, 2025. "Managerial Perspectives on the Use of Environmentally Friendly Energy in Accommodation Facilities in Northern Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Minthiva Pitchaya-Auckarakhun, 2024. "The future of work: financial implications of remote and hybrid work models," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 1, pages 13-38.
    11. Munaza Bibi & Tse Guan Tan & Heng Yao, 2025. "Exploring the Impact of AI Capabilities on Employee Well-Being: A Mediated Moderation Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    12. Xiaochang Chen & Xiaojun Liu & Wei Yu & Anran Tan & Chang Fu & Zongfu Mao, 2019. "Association between Cross-Cultural Social Adaptation and Overseas Life Satisfaction among Chinese Medical Aid Team Members (CMATMs) in Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-11, May.
    13. Agata Gniadkowska-Szymańska & Jakub Keller & Magdalena Kowalska, 2025. "Renewable Energy, Macroeconomic Stability and the Sustainable Development of the Logistics Sector: Evidence from the Visegrad Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-34, October.
    14. Downes, Rebecca & Daellenbach, Urs & Donnelly, Noelle, 2023. "Remote control: Attitude monitoring and informal control in distributed teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Shae Wissell & Leila Karimi & Tanya Serry & Lisa Furlong & Judith Hudson, 2022. "Leading Diverse Workforces: Perspectives from Managers and Employers about Dyslexic Employees in Australian Workplaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Emilio Bisetti & Benjamin Tengelsen & Ariel Zetlin‐Jones, 2022. "Moral Hazard In Remote Teams," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1595-1623, November.
    17. Xiajun Yu & Xue Lin & Danni Xue & Hui Zhou, 2024. "Impact of Work Engagement on Teachers’ Workplace Well-Being: A Serial Mediation Model of Perceived Organizational Support and Psychological Empowerment," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
    18. Michael Gerlich & Marko Milojevic & Liudmila Tsvetkova, 2025. "Economic Prosperity and the Implementation of Sustainable Development Models Among SMEs in European Countries: Correlational Analysis and Incentive System," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 8499-8510, November.
    19. Clara Laborie & Emmanuel Abord de Chatillon, 2022. "Le soutien social du manager direct : une solution pour limiter l’épuisement professionnel pendant la crise sanitaire liée à la COVID-19 ?," Post-Print hal-04520177, HAL.
    20. Andrei Georgian & Militaru Gheorghe, 2022. "The influence of telework on organizational performance: Evidence from Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 887-893, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7067-:d:1717272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.