IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i2p961-976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generation Z and Work Efficiency: Identifying Barriers and Factors Limiting Professional Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Inglot

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this article is to identify the most significant factors limiting effectiveness and job satisfaction among representatives of Generation Z, as well as to analyze the relationship between these difficulties and the broader context of young employees’ functioning. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study employed a quantitative approach using an online survey (CAWI) targeting individuals born between 1995 and 2012. The research sample included 110 respondents. Additionally, a narrative literature review and correlation analysis of the results were conducted. Four groups of factors were analyzed: physical environment, social environment, task organization, and attitude and psychophysical condition. Findings: The most problematic factor identified was procrastination, strongly associated with a lack of consistency in task execution. Other challenges included technological distractions and low motivation to work. Among the four categories of factors, psychophysical and attitudinal aspects posed the greatest challenges. Correlation analysis also revealed a link between low efficiency and the absence of goals, poor quality of breaks, and disorganized workspace. Factors such as sleep duration, commuting, or social disturbances showed no significant relationship with efficiency. Practical Implications: The findings suggest the need for a personalized approach to managing young employees, taking into account their motivation, work organization, and mental condition. Adjusting the work environment and leadership styles may enhance this group’s professional effectiveness and engagement. Originality/Value: This study fills a knowledge gap regarding internal limitations affecting Generation Z in the workplace. It highlights that not only external factors but also attitudes and psychophysical condition play a key role in determining effectiveness. The approach used enables practical application of the results in HR and management fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Inglot, 2025. "Generation Z and Work Efficiency: Identifying Barriers and Factors Limiting Professional Effectiveness," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 961-976.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:961-976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/4021/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maral Babapour Chafi & Annemarie Hultberg & Nina Bozic Yams, 2021. "Post-Pandemic Office Work: Perceived Challenges and Opportunities for a Sustainable Work Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Hyo-Sun Jung & Hye-Hyun Yoon, 2021. "Generational Effects of Workplace Flexibility on Work Engagement, Satisfaction, and Commitment in South Korean Deluxe Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Feng, Shihan & Huang, Feng, 2024. "Does survey mode matter? An experimental evaluation of data quality in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Sophie-Charlotte Meyer & Lena Hünefeld, 2018. "Challenging Cognitive Demands at Work, Related Working Conditions, and Employee Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Camelia Surugiu & Marius-Răzvan Surugiu & Cătălin Grădinaru & Ana-Maria Grigore, 2025. "Factors Motivating Generation Z in the Workplace: Managerial Challenges and Insights," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Patchara Popaitoon, 2022. "Fostering Work Meaningfulness for Sustainable Human Resources: A Study of Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monica Aureliana Petcu & Maria Iulia Sobolevschi-David & Raluca Florentina Crețu & Stefania Cristina Curea & Anca Maria Hristea & Mihaela Diana Oancea-Negescu & Daniela Tutui, 2023. "Telework: A Social and Emotional Perspective of the Impact on Employees’ Wellbeing in the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Byung-Jik Kim & Julak Lee, 2024. "The mental health implications of artificial intelligence adoption: the crucial role of self-efficacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Robert Edric Josef R. Lizares & Maria Assunta C. Cuyegkeng, 2024. "Building sustainable organizations online: How leaders embed sustainability into organizational culture in virtual contexts," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6434-6448, December.
    4. Minthiva Pitchaya-Auckarakhun, 2024. "The future of work: financial implications of remote and hybrid work models," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 1, pages 13-38.
    5. Xiaochang Chen & Xiaojun Liu & Wei Yu & Anran Tan & Chang Fu & Zongfu Mao, 2019. "Association between Cross-Cultural Social Adaptation and Overseas Life Satisfaction among Chinese Medical Aid Team Members (CMATMs) in Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Shae Wissell & Leila Karimi & Tanya Serry & Lisa Furlong & Judith Hudson, 2022. "Leading Diverse Workforces: Perspectives from Managers and Employers about Dyslexic Employees in Australian Workplaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Hazem Ali & Min Li & Xunmin Qiu, 2024. "Examination of HRM practices in relation to the retention of Chinese Gen Z employees," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Edgar Mascarenhas & Mónica D. Oliveira, 2025. "Correction to: Leveraging Group Decision Aiding with Decision Conferencing: A Systematic Review and a Roadmap for Future Research," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 435-438, June.
    9. Ika Zenita Ratnaningsih & Mohd Awang Idris, 2025. "Inter-Role Conflict Cycle: Family Distress in Work–Family Dynamics with Job and Home Demands," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 107-121, March.
    10. Camilla Dimitri & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Mihaela Enache-Zegheru & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2025. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Organization-Based Self-Esteem Integrating Sustainable Human Resource Management Perspectives," World, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Andrea Eriksson & Lotta Dellve & Anna Williamsson & Katrin Skagert, 2022. "How Conditions and Resources Connected to Digital Management Systems and Remote Work Are Associated with Sustainable Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    12. Meryem Aybas & Gaye Özçelik & Cavide Uyargil, 2022. "Can Decent Work Explain Employee-Level Outcomes? The Roles of Work–Family and Family–Work Conflict," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Vivek Vohra & Shiwangi Singh & Tanusree Dutta, 2024. "Embracing Flexibility Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Flexible Working Arrangements Using the SCM-TBFO Framework," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(1), pages 1-26, March.
    14. Chincea Rebecca & Potra Sabina & Tamasila Matei, 2024. "Features of an Internal Communication Platform for Corporate Employees. Meeting the Needs of Employees in a Hybrid Era," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2997-3006.
    15. Patchara Popaitoon, 2022. "Fostering Work Meaningfulness for Sustainable Human Resources: A Study of Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Juan A. Marin-Garcia & Tomas Bonavia & Josep-Maria Losilla, 2020. "Changes in the Association between European Workers’ Employment Conditions and Employee Well-Being in 2005, 2010 and 2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Alexander Oluka & Abdulla Kader, 2023. "Adoption of remote work: implications for tax practitioners," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 3(4(71)), pages 17-24, July.
    18. Sabrina Zeike & Kyung-Eun Choi & Lara Lindert & Holger Pfaff, 2019. "Managers’ Well-Being in the Digital Era: Is it Associated with Perceived Choice Overload and Pressure from Digitalization? An Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Shae Wissell & Leila Karimi & Tanya Serry & Lisa Furlong & Judith Hudson, 2022. "“You Don’t Look Dyslexic”: Using the Job Demands—Resource Model of Burnout to Explore Employment Experiences of Australian Adults with Dyslexia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Chang-Lan Xia & Tung-Ju Wu & An-Pin Wei & Pei-Guan Wu, 2020. "Are Chinese Entrepreneurs Happier than Employees? Evidence Based on a National Workforce Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:2:p:961-976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.