IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v88y2024ics1043951x24001603.html

Does survey mode matter? An experimental evaluation of data quality in China

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Shihan
  • Huang, Feng

Abstract

This study employs experimental data from the Labor Force Survey (LFS) to compare the data quality of computer-assisted web interviewing (CAWI) and computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI). The experiment was conducted in 2023 as part of the LFS, an ongoing longitudinal face-to-face survey of Chinese adults aged 16 and above in a mega city. Using the identical questionnaire, respondents were randomly assigned to either the control group (CAPI mode only) or the treatment group (optional CAPI and CAWI modes). The characteristics of households and individuals obtained using mixed-mode design do not significantly differ from those obtained from single-mode design (CAPI), indicating no mode effect on data quality for mixed-mode surveys. Additionally, there are no significant differences in data quality between CAWI and CAPI. CAWI respondents tend to take more time to answer the questions compared to CAPI respondents. Our findings offer valuable insights into enhancing mode-specific targeting and improving the quality of survey data collection by leveraging both existing survey data and paradata.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Shihan & Huang, Feng, 2024. "Does survey mode matter? An experimental evaluation of data quality in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s1043951x24001603
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001603
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hope, Steven & C. Campanelli, Pamela & Blake, Margaret & Mackie, Michelle, 2015. "Mixed modes and measurement error: using cognitive interviewing to explore the results of a mixed modes experiment," ISER Working Paper Series 2015-18, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    2. Craig Leisher, 2014. "A Comparison of Tablet-Based and Paper-Based Survey Data Collection in Conservation Projects," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-8, May.
    3. David J. Deming, 2022. "Four Facts about Human Capital," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 75-102, Summer.
    4. Jacob A. Mincer, 1974. "Schooling, Experience, and Earnings," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number minc74-1, January.
    5. Mark T. Buntaine & Michael Greenstone & Guojun He & Mengdi Liu & Shaoda Wang & Bing Zhang, 2024. "Does the Squeaky Wheel Get More Grease? The Direct and Indirect Effects of Citizen Participation on Environmental Governance in China," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(3), pages 815-850, March.
    6. Caeyers, Bet & Chalmers, Neil & De Weerdt, Joachim, 2012. "Improving consumption measurement and other survey data through CAPI: Evidence from a randomized experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 19-33.
    7. Xin Meng, 2012. "Labor Market Outcomes and Reforms in China," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(4), pages 75-102, Fall.
    8. Jacob A. Mincer, 1974. "Introduction to "Schooling, Experience, and Earnings"," NBER Chapters, in: Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, pages 1-4, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Bianchi Annamaria & Biffignandi Silvia & Lynn Peter, 2017. "Web-Face-to-Face Mixed-Mode Design in a Longitudinal Survey: Effects on Participation Rates, Sample Composition, and Costs," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(2), pages 385-408, June.
    10. Amy Finkelstein & Sarah Taubman & Bill Wright & Mira Bernstein & Jonathan Gruber & Joseph P. Newhouse & Heidi Allen & Katherine Baicker, 2012. "The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: Evidence from the First Year," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 127(3), pages 1057-1106.
    11. Lynn, Peter & Jäckle, Annette & Hope, Steven & C. Campanelli, Pamela & Nicolaas, Gerry, 2014. "The role of the interviewer in producing mode effects: results from a mixed modes experiment comparing face-to-face, telephone and web administration," ISER Working Paper Series 2014-20, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magdalena Inglot, 2025. "Generation Z and Work Efficiency: Identifying Barriers and Factors Limiting Professional Effectiveness," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 961-976.
    2. Tomova, Georgia D & Silverwood, Richard J. & Wright, Liam, 2026. "Mode effects on survey item measurement: A systematic review of the experimental evidence," SocArXiv bc7qn_v1, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Li & Sharpe, Rhonda Vonshay & Li, Shi & Darity, William A., 2016. "Wage differentials between urban and rural-urban migrant workers in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 222-233.
    2. Christina Langer & Simon Wiederhold, 2023. "The Value of Early-Career Skills," Working Papers 222, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    3. Harry A Patrinos & George Psacharopoulos, 2023. "Estimating returns to education: back to the short-cut," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 43(3), pages 1208-1213.
    4. Helal, Al Mansor & Hiraki, Ryotaro & Patrinos, Harry Anthony, 2026. "Returns to Education in the United States: A Comparison of OLS and Double Machine Learning Methods," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1733, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    5. Gustafsson, Björn & Li, Shi & Nivorozhkina, Ludmila & Wan, Haiyuan, 2015. "Yuan and Roubles: Comparing wage determination in urban China and Russia at the beginning of the new millennium," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 248-265.
    6. Patrinos, Harry Anthony & Rivera, Angelica, 2025. "Education and Earnings in Arkansas," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1621, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    7. Araki, Satoshi, 2025. "Reassessing human capital and health capital over the life course: Causal mediation analysis of higher education, health, and wages," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    8. Jie Chen & Francesco Pastore, 2024. "Dynamics of returns to vocational education in China: 2010–2017," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. M. Imran Khan, 2017. "Migrant workers in urban labour markets in India: wage differentials, assimilation and occupational attainment," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 60(3), pages 437-459, September.
    10. Néstor A. Clech, 2025. "Macroeconomic and institutional determinants of human capital wealth: gender disparities and implications," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 42(1), pages 121-153, April.
    11. Mingming Li & Yuan Tang & Keyan Jin, 2024. "Labor market segmentation and the gender wage gap: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Qiao Wen, 2022. "Trends in College–High School Wage Differentials in China: The Role of Cohort-Specific Labor Supply Shift," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Hu, Feng, 2015. "Return to Education for China’s Return Migrant Entrepreneurs," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 296-307.
    14. Qu, Zhaopeng & Zhao, Zhong, 2017. "Glass ceiling effect in urban China: Wage inequality of rural-urban migrants during 2002–2007," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 118-144.
    15. Paul Glewwe & Hasan Gul & Aysit Tansel & Suzanne Wisniewski, 2026. "The Impact of Vision Problems on Households' Incomes: Evidence From the 2019 and 2022 Rounds of the Turkey Health Survey," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 505-522, April.
    16. Ivana Fellini & Raffaele Guetto & Emilio Reyneri, 2018. "Poor Returns to Origin-Country Education for Non-Western Immigrants in Italy: An Analysis of Occupational Status on Arrival and Mobility," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 34-47.
    17. Katarzyna Growiec & Jakub Growiec, 2016. "Bridging Social Capital and Individual Earnings: Evidence for an Inverted U," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 601-631, June.
    18. Kaspar W thrich, 2013. "Set Identification of Generalized Linear Predictors in the Presence of Non-Classical Measurement Errors," Diskussionsschriften dp1304, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    19. Jin Jiang & Hon-Kwong Lui, 2025. "Lifetime Earnings Premium of Higher Education: Evidence from the 40-Year Career of the 1951–1955 Birth Cohort in Hong Kong," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(3), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Nicholas Sim, 2015. "Astronomics In Action: The Graduate Earnings Premium And The Dragon Effect In Singapore," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 53(2), pages 922-939, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • J30 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:88:y:2024:i:c:s1043951x24001603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.