IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i9p347-d1742133.html

Social Well-Being Strategies for Academics Working in a Hybrid Work Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Rudo Rachel Marozva

    (Business School, North-West University, Mahikeng 2790, South Africa)

  • Anna-Marie Pelser

    (Business School, North-West University, Mahikeng 2790, South Africa)

Abstract

The hybrid work environment significantly undermines the social well-being of employees in the workplace. Existing research predominantly addresses academics’ well-being challenges without offering practical strategies to counter these issues. This study identifies strategies that higher education institutions must adopt to enhance the social well-being of their academics in hybrid work settings. It employs Demerouti’s Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model and Baumeister and Leary’s theory of the need to belong as its theoretical framework. Using a cross-sectional qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were guided by an interview schedule to gather data. The sample comprised 23 academics from three campuses of North-West University, and thematic analysis was utilized to analyse the data. The study revealed that growth strategies, such as training, development, and mentoring, are crucial for fostering a sense of belonging, strengthening work relationships, and helping academics connect in a hybrid work environment. Support strategies like providing peer support, management support, physical resources, effective communication, and improvements in job quality enhance academics’ social well-being in this setting. Relationship strategies, which entail organizing social events and promoting a positive organizational culture, are key to encouraging social well-being in the hybrid work environment. Additionally, reward strategies, such as recognition and direct compensation, are essential for reinforcing a sense of belonging, improving work relationships, and enhancing social connections in a hybrid work environment. Intentional, coach-oriented, sensible, and inclusive leadership is vital. The findings offer valuable insights for higher education institutions to adopt a more comprehensive approach to managing the well-being of academic employees. This highlights the need to focus not only on mental and psychological health but also on social well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Rudo Rachel Marozva & Anna-Marie Pelser, 2025. "Social Well-Being Strategies for Academics Working in a Hybrid Work Environment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:347-:d:1742133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/9/347/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/9/347/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Hopkins & Anne Bardoel, 2023. "The Future Is Hybrid: How Organisations Are Designing and Supporting Sustainable Hybrid Work Models in Post-Pandemic Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Fiona Niebuhr & Prem Borle & Franziska Börner-Zobel & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2022. "Healthy and Happy Working from Home? Effects of Working from Home on Employee Health and Job Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Priyanka Sihag, 2021. "The Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Employee Engagement: A Study of Indian IT Industry," International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 12(2), pages 35-52, April.
    4. Dr. Muhammad Bilal Ahmad & Ayesha Badar & Dr. Muhammad Ramzan, 2023. "Investigating the Factors Affecting Employee Job Satisfaction through Job Autonomy in the Growing Concept of Hybrid Working Model in the IT Industry," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(2), pages 591-601.
    5. Maral Babapour Chafi & Annemarie Hultberg & Nina Bozic Yams, 2021. "Post-Pandemic Office Work: Perceived Challenges and Opportunities for a Sustainable Work Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Edric Josef R. Lizares & Maria Assunta C. Cuyegkeng, 2024. "Building sustainable organizations online: How leaders embed sustainability into organizational culture in virtual contexts," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6434-6448, December.
    2. Minthiva Pitchaya-Auckarakhun, 2024. "The future of work: financial implications of remote and hybrid work models," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 1, pages 13-38.
    3. Vivek Vohra & Shiwangi Singh & Tanusree Dutta, 2024. "Embracing Flexibility Post-COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Flexible Working Arrangements Using the SCM-TBFO Framework," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(1), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Ruth Bhekekile Shandu & Thokozani Ian Nzimakwe & Reward Utete, 2024. "Analysing the effects of flexible working conditions in the workplace: An exploratory study," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 6(6), pages 109-120, December.
    5. Jinjia Liang & Tomio Miwa & Takayuki Morikawa, 2023. "Preferences and Expectations of Japanese Employees toward Telecommuting Frequency in the Post-Pandemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Malou Grubben & Sara Wiertsema & Remco Hoekman & Gerbert Kraaykamp, 2022. "Is Working from Home during COVID-19 Associated with Increased Sports Participation? Contexts of Sports, Sports Location and Socioeconomic Inequality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Juliana Salvadorinho & Leonor Teixeira, 2023. "Happy and Engaged Workforce in Industry 4.0: A New Concept of Digital Tool for HR Based on Theoretical and Practical Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-29, February.
    8. Giuseppe Varavallo & Giulia Scarpetti & Filippo Barbera, 2023. "The moral economy of the great resignation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez, 2023. "A Configurational Evaluation of Spanish Teleworkers’ Perception and Nonperception of Stress during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Hryn Dmytro V. & Yaroshenko Oleg M. & Tykhonovych Oleksii Y. & Hryhorenko Dmytro A. & Pavlichenko Volodymir, 2024. "Legal Regulation of Hybrid Work Models and Their Impact on Work-Life Balance: A Case Study of Ukraine," Comparative Southeast European Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 72(4), pages 419-435.
    11. Diego Bellini & Barbara Barbieri & Marina Mondo & Silvia De Simone & Silvia Marocco, 2025. "Sustainable Work–Life Balance, Social Support, and Workload: Exploring the Potential Dual Role of Flexible Work in a Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Lea Wolf & Ronny Ehlen & Mona-Maria Bardmann & Caroline Ruiner & Julia Lanzl & Manfred Schoch & Henner Gimpel, 2024. "The role of internal CSR in guiding the digitalisation of work," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Nur Idayu Badrolhisam & Rossilah Jamil, 2025. "Gender flexible work arrangements: a global bibliometric analysis with a focus on Asian content," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, December.
    14. Fiona Niebuhr & Greta M. Steckhan & Susanne Voelter-Mahlknecht, 2022. "New Work Poses New Challenges—The Importance of Work Design Competencies Revealed in Cluster Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-12, October.
    15. David Shaholli & Maria Vittoria Manai & Francesco Iantorno & Luca Di Giampaolo & Hector Alberto Nieto & Emilio Greco & Giuseppe La Torre & Simone De Sio, 2024. "Teleworking and Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review on Health Effects and Preventive Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Berislav Andrlić & Kankanamge Gayan Priyashantha & Adambarage Chamaru De Alwis, 2023. "Employee Engagement Management in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Casper Gamborg Holm & Louise Kringelum & Amitabh Anand, 2026. "Creating effective strategy implementation: a systematic review of managerial and organizational levers," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 673-705, February.
    18. Edgar Mascarenhas & Mónica D. Oliveira, 2025. "Correction to: Leveraging Group Decision Aiding with Decision Conferencing: A Systematic Review and a Roadmap for Future Research," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 435-438, June.
    19. Monica Aureliana Petcu & Maria Iulia Sobolevschi-David & Raluca Florentina Crețu & Stefania Cristina Curea & Anca Maria Hristea & Mihaela Diana Oancea-Negescu & Daniela Tutui, 2023. "Telework: A Social and Emotional Perspective of the Impact on Employees’ Wellbeing in the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, January.
    20. Ilyar Heydari Barardehi & Anna Kurowska, 2024. "Were Parents Synchronizing Their Home-Based Working Arrangements During the COVID-19 Pandemic?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 569-588, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:347-:d:1742133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.