IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10159-d1180075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Double-Edged Sword Effect of Flexible Work Arrangements on Employee Innovation Performance: From the Demands–Resources–Individual Effects Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Liyuan Wang

    (Research Center for Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Development, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China)

  • Tianyi Xie

    (School of Law and Humanities, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

This study explores the double-edged sword effect of FWAs on employee innovation performance based on the Demand–Resource–Individual Effect (DRIVE) model. A total of 411 valid questionnaires from knowledge-based employees were collected in three stages through a survey of technology-based companies in China. The data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 22 software, and multi-level linear model analysis was conducted to test the double mediating effect of psychological empowerment and role ambiguity and the moderating effect of role breadth self-efficacy. This study found that, in terms of the job demand path, flexible work arrangements (FWAs) increased employees’ role ambiguity, which in turn decreased their innovation performance; in terms of the job resource path, FWAs increased employees’ psychological empowerment, which in turn increased their innovation performance. From the perspective of individual differences, under the flexible work system, employees with high role breadth self-efficacy can enhance their psychological empowerment and reduce role ambiguity, thus promoting their innovation performance. This study is the first to analyze the “double-edged sword” effect of FWAs on employee innovation performance based on the DRIVE model, which effectively extends the moderating variable of role breadth self-efficacy in the model and helps to understand the impact of different types of FWAs on employee innovation performance. In addition, this study provides a reference for technology-based companies to strengthen their digital capabilities and regulation of FWAs, which is conducive to achieving sustainable business development.

Suggested Citation

  • Liyuan Wang & Tianyi Xie, 2023. "Double-Edged Sword Effect of Flexible Work Arrangements on Employee Innovation Performance: From the Demands–Resources–Individual Effects Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10159-:d:1180075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coenen, Marja & Kok, Robert A.W., 2014. "Workplace flexibility and new product development performance: The role of telework and flexible work schedules," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 564-576.
    2. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Faridun Bozorov & Sanghyun Sung, 2019. "Paternalistic Leadership and Innovative Behavior: Psychological Empowerment as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Martin Lange & Ina Kayser, 2022. "The Role of Self-Efficacy, Work-Related Autonomy and Work-Family Conflict on Employee’s Stress Level during Home-Based Remote Work in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Estelle Michinov & Caroline Ruiller & Frédérique Chédotel & Virginie Dodeler & Nicolas Michinov, 2022. "Work-From-Home During COVID-19 Lockdown: When Employees’ Well-Being and Creativity Depend on Their Psychological Profiles," Post-Print hal-03671607, HAL.
    5. Yasuhiro Kotera & Katia Correa Vione, 2020. "Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Sang-Hoon Lee & Yuhyung Shin & Seung Ik Baek, 2017. "Task Characteristics and Work Engagement: Exploring Effects of Role Ambiguity and ICT Presenteeism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Aydogmus, Ceren & Metin Camgoz, Selin & Ergeneli, Azize & Tayfur Ekmekci, Ozge, 2018. "Perceptions of transformational leadership and job satisfaction: The roles of personality traits and psychological empowerment §," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 81-107, January.
    8. Siyuan Miao & Abdulkhamid Komil ugli Fayzullaev & Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov, 2020. "Management Characteristics as Determinants of Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Employee Job Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Sofie Bjärntoft & David M. Hallman & Camilla Zetterberg & Johan Larsson & Johanna Edvinsson & Helena Jahncke, 2021. "A Participatory Approach to Identify Key Areas for Sustainable Work Environment and Health in Employees with Flexible Work Arrangements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Nataliya Nerobkova & Yu Shin Park & Eun-Cheol Park & Suk-Yong Jang, 2022. "The Association between Working Hours Flexibility and Well-Being Prior to and during COVID-19 in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-11, July.
    11. Ávila-Robinson, Alfonso & Islam, Nazrul & Sengoku, Shintaro, 2022. "Exploring the knowledge base of innovation research: Towards an emerging innovation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Zhou, Qin & Martinez, Luis F. & Ferreira, Aristides I. & Rodrigues, Piedade, 2016. "Supervisor support, role ambiguity and productivity associated with presenteeism: A longitudinal study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3380-3387.
    13. Sarbu, Miruna, 2018. "The role of telecommuting for work-family conflict among German employees," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 37-51.
    14. Jing Zhang & Yidan Hong & Andrew P. Smith, 2022. "The Relationship between Role Ambiguity and Workers’ Creativity during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-12, November.
    15. Miao Qing & Muhammad Asif & Abid Hussain & Arif Jameel, 2020. "Exploring the impact of ethical leadership on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in public sector organizations: the mediating role of psychological empowerment," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 1405-1432, December.
    16. Sidra Salam & Aslan Amat Senin, 2022. "A Bibliometric Study on Innovative Behavior Literature (1961–2019)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    17. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Vrontis, Demetris, 2022. "Does remote work flexibility enhance organization performance? Moderating role of organization policy and top management support," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1501-1512.
    18. Neena Gopalan & Murugan Pattusamy, 2020. "Role of Work and Family Factors in Predicting Career Satisfaction and Life Success," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Yanwei Sun & Dazhuo Mo & Ting Nie, 2022. "Employee Adversarial Growth Driven by Organizational Learning in the Chinese Pharmaceutical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Shuanglong Wang & Nathan Eva & Alexander Newman & Haihua Zhou, 2021. "A double-edged sword: the effects of ambidextrous leadership on follower innovative behaviors," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 1305-1326, December.
    21. Sarah Cheah & Shiyu li & Yuen-Ping Ho, 2019. "Mutual Support, Role Breadth Self-Efficacy, and Sustainable Job Performance of Workers in Young Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    22. Panda, Madhusmita & Pradhan, Rabindra Kumar & Singh, Sanjay Kumar, 2022. "What makes organization-assigned expatriates perform in the host country? A moderated mediation analysis in the India-China context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 663-673.
    23. Zapata-Phelan, Cindy P. & Colquitt, Jason A. & Scott, Brent A. & Livingston, Beth, 2009. "Procedural justice, interactional justice, and task performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 93-105, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xi Chen & Shaofen Fang & Yujie Li & Haibin Wang, 2019. "Does Identification Influence Continuous E-Commerce Consumption? The Mediating Role of Intrinsic Motivations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Yuan Jing Luo & Yan Ping Li & Jing Du, 2020. "Coping with Supervisor Sanctions During Organizational Change: Core Members’ Active Change Behavior and Followers’ Middle Way Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Ko, Eun-Jung & Kim, A-Hyun & Kim, Sang-Soo, 2021. "Toward the understanding of the appropriation of ICT-based Smart-work and its impact on performance in organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. David Giauque & Frédéric Cornu & Karine Renard & Yves Emery, 2023. "Opportunity to Use New Ways of Working: Do Sectors and Organizational Characteristics Shape Employee Perceptions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Richard Surungan Hutajulu, 2021. "Factors of Safety Culture and their Implication to Job Satisfaction in the Construction Industry," GATR Journals gjbssr595, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    6. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Henry Santa-Cruz-Espinoza & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Julio Domínguez-Vergara & César Merino-Soto, 2023. "Internal Structure of the Work–Family Conflict Questionnaire (WFCQ) in Teacher Teleworking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Youkyung Ko & Hwaneui Lee & Sunghyup Sean Hyun, 2021. "Airline Cabin Crew Team System’s Positive Evaluation Factors and Their Impact on Personal Health and Team Potency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-20, October.
    9. repec:thr:techub:10015:y:2021:i:1:p:400-426 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Fatoki Olawale, 2023. "Participative Leadership and Employee Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Effects of Psychological Empowerment and Work Engagement," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 161-176, January.
    11. Chan, Sow Hup Joanne & Lai, Ho Yan Isabella, 2017. "Understanding the link between communication satisfaction, perceived justice and organizational citizenship behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 214-223.
    12. Chen, Xiaogang & Ma, Jing & Jin, Jiafei & Fosh, Patricia, 2013. "Information privacy, gender differences, and intrinsic motivation in the workplace," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 917-926.
    13. Yuhyung Shin & Won-Moo Hur & Kyungdo Park & Hansol Hwang, 2020. "How Managers’ Job Crafting Reduces Turnover Intention: The Mediating Roles of Role Ambiguity and Emotional Exhaustion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Juliana Salvadorinho & Leonor Teixeira, 2023. "Happy and Engaged Workforce in Industry 4.0: A New Concept of Digital Tool for HR Based on Theoretical and Practical Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-29, February.
    15. Muhammad Umer Azeem & Inam Ul Haq & Ghulam Murtaza & Hina Jaffery, 2023. "Challenge–Hindrance Stressors, Helping Behavior and Job Performance: Double-Edged Sword of Religiousness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 687-699, May.
    16. Nadežda Jankelová & Zuzana Joniaková & Anita Romanová & Katarína Remeňová, 2020. "Motivational factors and job satisfaction of employees in agriculture in the context of performance of agricultural companies in Slovakia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(9), pages 402-412.
    17. Lee, Randy & Mai, Ke Michael & Qiu, Feng & Ilies, Remus & Tang, Pok Man, 2022. "Are you too happy to serve others? When and why positive affect makes customer mistreatment experience feel worse," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    18. Brice Corgnet & Roberto Hernán-González & Eric Schniter, 2015. "Why real leisure really matters: incentive effects on real effort in the laboratory," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 284-301, June.
    19. David C. Thomas & Elizabeth C. Ravlin & Yuan Liao & Daniel L. Morrell & Kevin Au, 2016. "Collectivist Values, Exchange Ideology and Psychological Contract Preference," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 255-281, April.
    20. R. Krishankumar & K. S. Ravichandran, 2018. "Realizing the effects of trust and personality in cross functional teams using ANFIS classification framework," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 243-276, June.
    21. Setiyo & Yatim Riyanto & Luthfiyah Nurlaela, 2019. "Cognitive Apprenticeship Improves Self Efficacy At Aviation Polytechnic Of Surabaya," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 10(1), pages 9-11.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10159-:d:1180075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.