IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v39y2021i2p270-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between presenteeism and job satisfaction: A mediated moderation model using work engagement and perceived organizational support

Author

Listed:
  • Côté, Karine
  • Lauzier, Martin
  • Stinglhamber, Florence

Abstract

Research on presenteeism has largely focused on its prevalence, determinants and consequences on the health of both employees and organizations. To date, few studies have examined the influence of presenteeism on workers’ attitudinal and motivational responses. Based on the Effort–Recovery Theory, this study evaluates the mediating effect of work engagement in the relationship between presenteeism and job satisfaction. Building on previous work, this study also proposes to consider perceived organizational support as a moderator of the work engagement–job satisfaction relationship. Presented in the form of a mediated moderation model, the results of bootstrapped regression analyses show three main results. First, presenteeism is negatively associated with work engagement and job satisfaction. Secondly, work engagement is one of the factors through which presenteeism influences job satisfaction. Thirdly, perceived organizational support moderates the association between work engagement and job satisfaction so that, at a low level of work engagement, feeling supported by the organization makes a difference on job satisfaction. Overall, this research is part of the limited number of studies that have focused on the interplay existing between presenteeism and its consequences in terms of job attitudes.

Suggested Citation

  • Côté, Karine & Lauzier, Martin & Stinglhamber, Florence, 2021. "The relationship between presenteeism and job satisfaction: A mediated moderation model using work engagement and perceived organizational support," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 270-278.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:39:y:2021:i:2:p:270-278
    DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237320301274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Wei & Sun, Huiying & Woodcock, Simon & Anis, Aslam, 2015. "Illness related wage and productivity losses: Valuing ‘presenteeism’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 62-71.
    2. Mark V. Pauly & Sean Nicholson & Daniel Polsky & Marc L. Berger & Claire Sharda, 2008. "Valuing reductions in on‐the‐job illness: ‘presenteeism’ from managerial and economic perspectives," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(4), pages 469-485, April.
    3. Karanika-Murray, Maria & Pontes, Halley M. & Griffiths, Mark D. & Biron, Caroline, 2015. "Sickness presenteeism determines job satisfaction via affective-motivational states," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 100-106.
    4. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    5. Hansen, Claus D. & Andersen, Johan H., 2008. "Going ill to work - What personal circumstances, attitudes and work-related factors are associated with sickness presenteeism?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 956-964, September.
    6. Daniel Arnold, 2016. "Determinants of the Annual Duration of Sickness Presenteeism: Empirical Evidence from European Data," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 30(2), pages 198-212, June.
    7. Alfes, Kerstin & Shantz, Amanda & Truss, Catherine & Soane, Emma, 2013. "The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42345, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Riggle, Robert J. & Edmondson, Diane R. & Hansen, John D., 2009. "A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and job outcomes: 20 years of research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 1027-1030, October.
    9. Brikend AZIRI, 2011. "Job Satisfaction, A Literature Review," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(4), pages 77-86, December.
    10. Merce Mach & Aristides I Ferreira & Luis F Martinez & Antonina Lisowskaia & Grace K Dagher & Amalia R Perez-Nebra, 2018. "Working conditions in hospitals revisited: A moderated-mediated model of job context and presenteeism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Peter Van Bogaert & Sean Clarke & Ella Roelant & Herman Meulemans & Paul Van de Heyning, 2010. "Impacts of unit‐level nurse practice environment and burnout on nurse‐reported outcomes: a multilevel modelling approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1664-1674, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. César Torres-Martín & Inmaculada Alemany-Arrebola & Manuel Enrique Lorenzo-Martín & Ángel Custodio Mingorance-Estrada, 2021. "Psychological Distress and Psychosocial Factors in the Non-Formal Context of Basketball Coaches in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Milan Andrejić & Milorad Kilibarda & Vukašin Pajić, 2022. "Job Satisfaction and Labor Fluctuation: A Case Study in the Logistics Sector in Serbia," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Qin Li & Rosmah Mohamed & Anuar Mahomed & Hanna Khan, 2022. "The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Care on Turnover Intention and Work Engagement: A Mediated Moderation Model Using Age in the Post Pandemic Period," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Bin Du & Bin He & Luxiaohe Zhang & Nan Luo & Xuan Yu & Ai Wang, 2022. "From Subordinate Moqi to Work Engagement: The Role of Leader–Member Exchange in the Sustainability Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Yufei Cheng & Huanxin Liu & Yiwei Yuan & Zhonghao Zhang & Jinguo Zhao, 2022. "What Makes Employees Green Advocates? Exploring the Effects of Green Human Resource Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Eun-Chul Seo & Young-Kyun Sim & Inwoo Kim & Jae-Pil Seo & Min-Seong Ha & Song-Eun Kim, 2023. "The Mediating Effect of Presenteeism on the Relationship between Emotional Labor and Work Engagement of Coaches for Disability Sports," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Bieńkowska & Katarzyna Tworek, 2020. "Job Performance Model Based on Employees’ Dynamic Capabilities (EDC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Tilahun Kidane Diko & Shabnam Saxena, 2023. "Antecedents and outcome of employee engagement: Empirical study of Ethiopian public higher education institutions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Boris HirschBy & Daniel S. J. Lechmann & Claus Schnabel, 2017. "Coming to work while sick: an economic theory of presenteeism with an application to German data," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 69(4), pages 1010-1031.
    4. Bubonya, Melisa & Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Wooden, Mark, 2017. "Mental health and productivity at work: Does what you do matter?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 150-165.
    5. Nasser Saad Al Kahtani & Sulphey M. M., 2022. "A Study on How Psychological Capital, Social Capital, Workplace Wellbeing, and Employee Engagement Relate to Task Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    6. Gürtzgen, Nicole & Hiesinger, Karolin, 2020. "Dismissal protection and long-term sickness absence: First evidence from Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-040, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Antonino Callea & Amelia Manuti, 2022. "“I Like It like That”: A Study on the Relationship between Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Extra-Role Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Hazrat Bilal & Naveed Farooq & Kauser Hayat, 2019. "Empirically Investigating the Impact of Employee Engagement on Counterproductive Work Behavior of Academic Staff," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 120-127, March.
    9. Marcela-Sefora Nemteanu & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2020. "The Influence of Heavy Work Investment on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention in Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 993-993, November.
    10. Stefan Pichler & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2020. "Labor Market Effects of U.S. Sick Pay Mandates," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 55(2), pages 611-659.
    11. Pinna, Roberta & De Simone, Silvia & Cicotto, Gianfranco & Malik, Ashish, 2020. "Beyond organisational support: Exploring the supportive role of co-workers and supervisors in a multi-actor service ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 524-534.
    12. Renaud Gaucher & Ruut Veenhoven, 2022. "What is in the name? Content analysis of questionnaires on perceived quality of one’s work life," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1045-1072, June.
    13. Mark L. Bryan & Andrew M. Bryce & Jennifer Roberts, 2022. "Dysfunctional presenteeism: Effects of physical and mental health on work performance," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 90(4), pages 409-438, July.
    14. Zeidan Susan & Itani Noura, 2020. "Cultivating Employee Engagement in Organizations: Development of a Conceptual Framework," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 28(1), pages 99-118, March.
    15. Arnold, Daniel Timo & de Pinto, Marco, 2015. "Sickness absence, presenteeism and work-related characteristics," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 113118, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. Claus Schnabel, 2022. "Presenteeism at the workplace," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 495-495, May.
    17. Ana Junça-Silva & António Caetano & Rita Rueff Lopes, 2017. "Daily Uplifts, Well-Being and Performance in Organizational Settings: The Differential Mediating Roles of Affect and Work Engagement," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 591-606, April.
    18. Katarzyna Miszczynska & Elzbieta Antczak, 2023. "The Determinants of Presenteeism in Selected European Countries- Modelling from Geographical and Gender Perspectives," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 255-280.
    19. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2021. "Linkage between Leaders’ Behaviour in Performance Management, Organisational Justice and Work Engagement in Public Sector," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Agarwal, Upasna A. & Gupta, Vishal, 2015. "Examination of a Moderated-Mediation Model Linking Perceived Organizational Support, Affective Commitment, Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Work Engagement: A Study of Nurses in the Indian Cont," IIMA Working Papers WP2015-03-05, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:39:y:2021:i:2:p:270-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.