IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecmode/v149y2025ics0264999325001038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The power of the business group: Differences in firm hiring decisions under labor protection shock

Author

Listed:
  • Shangguan, Yiwen
  • Feng, Qiyangfan

Abstract

Labor protection shocks significantly influence firms' employment decisions. Previous studies have highlighted varying labor employment behaviors in response to such shocks, but they have not focused on the distinctions between group-affiliated and unaffiliated firms. Using the Labor Contract Law (LCL) in China as an exogenous labor protection shock, we constructed a unique firm-group level database to investigate the differences in employment responses between these two types of firms. Our findings reveal that while the LCL reduced overall labor employment, its impact on group-affiliated firms was considerably less severe than on unaffiliated firms. This more measured adjustment in employment is mainly attributable to the reallocation of liquid assets among affiliated firms within business groups. By adopting such strategies, group-affiliated firms attained relatively better performance in total factor productivity and profitability compared to non-affiliated firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Shangguan, Yiwen & Feng, Qiyangfan, 2025. "The power of the business group: Differences in firm hiring decisions under labor protection shock," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:149:y:2025:i:c:s0264999325001038
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325001038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:149:y:2025:i:c:s0264999325001038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.