IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nwu/cmsems/1057.html

Quacks, Lemons, and Self-Regulation: A Welfare Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Gehrig
  • Peter-J. Jost

Abstract

The paper provides a framework in which suppliers of experience goods find it in their best interest to provide and enforce quality standards. This self-regulatory outcome is compared to various forms of statutory regulation, such as price regulation and quality regulation. The comparision is attractive, since the suppliers can observe each others' product qulity at lower cost than customers or policy maker. As long as quality is the only variable unknown to consumers and policy makers, any self-regulatory outcome can be replicated by an appropriate statutory policy. However, when additional variables (such as cost parameters) are private information of the suppliers, self-regulation may be strictly socially desirable.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Gehrig & Peter-J. Jost, 1993. "Quacks, Lemons, and Self-Regulation: A Welfare Analysis," Discussion Papers 1057, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwu:cmsems:1057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/math/papers/1057.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Russell Cooper & Thomas W. Ross, 1985. "Product Warranties and Double Moral Hazard," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 16(1), pages 103-113, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoy, Michael & Polborn, Mattias K., 2015. "The value of technology improvements in games with externalities: A fresh look at offsetting behavior," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 12-20.
    2. Andersson, Fredrik & Skogh, Goran, 2003. "Quality, self-regulation, and competition: the case of insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 267-280, April.
    3. Junhong Chu & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2009. "Quantifying the Economic Value of Warranties in the U.S. Server Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 99-121, 01-02.
    4. Centner, Terence J. & Wetzstein, Michael E., 1994. "Automobile And Tractor Lemon Laws," 1994 Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses Risk, Technical Committee Meeting, March 24-26, 1994, Gulf Shores State Park, Alabama 271679, Regional Research Projects > S-232: Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk.
    5. Anson Wong, 2014. "The role of government in the venture capital market with asymmetric information," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(6), pages 1107-1114, June.
    6. Morasch, Karl, 1995. "Moral hazard and optimal contract form for R&D cooperation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 63-78, September.
    7. Yalabik, Baris & Petruzzi, Nicholas C. & Chhajed, Dilip, 2005. "An integrated product returns model with logistics and marketing coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(1), pages 162-182, February.
    8. Derek K.Y. Chau & Michael Firth & Bin Srinidhi, 2006. "Leases with Purchase Options and Double Moral Hazard," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9‐10), pages 1390-1401, November.
    9. Chen, Xu & Li, Ling & Zhou, Ming, 2012. "Manufacturer's pricing strategy for supply chain with warranty period-dependent demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 807-816.
    10. Andrew Samuel & Seth D. Guikema, 2012. "Resource Allocation for Homeland Defense: Dealing with the Team Effect," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 238-252, September.
    11. Sprinkle, Geoffrey B., 2003. "Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 287-318.
    12. Lam, Wing Man Wynne, 2016. "Attack-prevention and damage-control investments in cybersecurity," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 42-51.
    13. de Bijl, P.W.J., 1995. "Aftermarkets : The monopoly case," Other publications TiSEM 584b127c-94e7-4dbd-b455-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Kurt, Didem & Pauwels, Koen & Kurt, Ahmet C. & Srinivasan, Shuba, 2021. "The asymmetric effect of warranty payments on firm value: The moderating role of advertising, R&D, and industry concentration," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 817-837.
    15. Nabil Ibraheem Al‐Najjar, 1994. "Reputation, Product Quality, and Warranties," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 605-637, December.
    16. Al-Najjar, Nabil I., 1997. "Incentive Contracts in Two-Sided Moral Hazards with Multiple Agents," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 174-195, May.
    17. Thomas J. Miceli, 1992. "Habitability Laws for Rental Housing: The Impact of Tenant Inputs," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(1), pages 15-24, February.
    18. Jianhua Ma & Xingzheng Ai & Wen Yang & Yanchun Pan, 2019. "Decentralization versus coordination in competing supply chains under retailers’ extended warranties," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 485-510, April.
    19. Nina Boyarchenko & Anna M. Costello, 2014. "Counterparty risk in material supply contracts," Staff Reports 694, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    20. Tsoulouhas, Theofanis, 1999. "Do tournaments solve the two-sided moral hazard problem?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 275-294, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwu:cmsems:1057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fran Walker The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Fran Walker to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cmnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.