IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isc/iscwp2/bruwp1307.html

The Use And Misuse Of Structural Equation Modeling In Management Research

Author

Listed:
  • Nebojsa S. Davcik

Abstract

The research practice in management research is dominantly based on structural equation modeling, but almost exclusively, and often misguidedly, on covariance-based SEM. We adumbrate theoretical foundations and guidance for the two SEM streams: covariance-based, also known as LISREL, covariance structure analysis, latent variable analysis, etc.; and variance-based SEM, also known as a component-based SEM, PLS, etc. Our conceptual framework discusses the two streams by analysis of theory, measurement model specification, sample and goodness-of-fit. We question the usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha research paradigm and discuss alternatives that are well-established in social science, but not well-known in the management research community. We conclude with discussion of some open questions in management research practice that remain under-investigated and unutilized.

Suggested Citation

  • Nebojsa S. Davcik, 2013. "The Use And Misuse Of Structural Equation Modeling In Management Research," Working Papers Series 2 13-07, ISCTE-IUL, Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL).
    • Handle: RePEc:isc:iscwp2:bruwp1307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bru-unide.iscte.pt/RePEc/pdfs/13-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louis Guttman, 1945. "A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 10(4), pages 255-282, December.
    2. TENENHAUS, Michel, 2008. "Component-based structural equation modelling," HEC Research Papers Series 887, HEC Paris.
    3. Wilcox, James B. & Howell, Roy D. & Breivik, Einar, 2008. "Questions about formative measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 1219-1228, December.
    4. Cyril Hoyt, 1941. "Test reliability estimated by analysis of variance," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 6(3), pages 153-160, June.
    5. Michel Tenenhaus, 2008. "Component-based Structural Equation Modelling," Working Papers hal-00580149, HAL.
    6. Jos Berge & Henk Kiers, 1991. "A numerical approach to the approximate and the exact minimum rank of a covariance matrix," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 309-315, June.
    7. Paul Jackson & Christian Agunwamba, 1977. "Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of non-homogeneous items: I: Algebraic lower bounds," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(4), pages 567-578, December.
    8. Lee, Sik-Yum & Song, Xin-Yuan, 2008. "On Bayesian estimation and model comparison of an integrated structural equation model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 4814-4827, June.
    9. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Riefler, Petra & Roth, Katharina P., 2008. "Advancing formative measurement models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 1203-1218, December.
    10. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    11. Heungsun Hwang & Moon-Ho Ho & Jonathan Lee, 2010. "Generalized Structured Component Analysis with Latent Interactions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 228-242, June.
    12. Herman Wold, 1980. "Model Construction and Evaluation When Theoretical Knowledge Is Scarce," NBER Chapters, in: Evaluation of Econometric Models, pages 47-74, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. P. M. Bentler & Chih-Ping Chou, 1987. "Practical Issues in Structural Modeling," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 16(1), pages 78-117, August.
    14. Lauren I. Labrecque & Anjala S. Krishen & Stephan Grzeskowiak, 2011. "Exploring social motivations for brand loyalty: Conformity versus escapism," Post-Print hal-00658498, HAL.
    15. MacKenzie, Scott B, 2001. "Opportunities for Improving Consumer Research through Latent Variable Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 159-166, June.
    16. Fornell, Claes, 1983. "Issues in the Application of Covariance Structure Analysis: A Comment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(4), pages 443-448, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panagopoulos, Nikolaos G. & Avlonitis, George J., 2010. "Performance implications of sales strategy: The moderating effects of leadership and environment," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 46-57.
    2. Justina GineikienÄ—, 2013. "Consumer Nostalgia Literature Review And An Alternative Measurement Perspective," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 4(2).
    3. Jos Berge & Gregor Sočan, 2004. "The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 613-625, December.
    4. Gyeongcheol Cho & Heungsun Hwang & Marko Sarstedt & Christian M. Ringle, 2020. "Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(4), pages 189-202, December.
    5. Grahame R. Dowling & Tayo Otubanjo, 2011. "Corporate and organizational identity: two sides of the same coin," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 1(3), pages 171-182, December.
    6. Moulard, Julie Guidry & Kroff, Michael W. & Folse, Judith Anne Garretson, 2012. "Unraveling consumer suspense: The role of hope, fear, and probability fluctuations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 340-346.
    7. Jeffrey G. Covin & William J. Wales, 2012. "The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Orientation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(4), pages 677-702, July.
    8. Gyeongcheol Cho & Christopher Schlaegel & Heungsun Hwang & Younyoung Choi & Marko Sarstedt & Christian M. Ringle, 2022. "Integrated Generalized Structured Component Analysis: On the Use of Model Fit Criteria in International Management Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 569-609, August.
    9. Eunseong Cho, 2021. "Neither Cronbach’s Alpha nor McDonald’s Omega: A Commentary on Sijtsma and Pfadt," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 877-886, December.
    10. Joseph F. Hair & G. Tomas M. Hult & Christian M. Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2017. "Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 616-632, September.
    11. Aurelio Scaglione & Daria Mendola, 2017. "Measuring the perceived value of rural tourism: a field survey in the western Sicilian agritourism sector," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 745-763, March.
    12. Baxter, Roger, 2009. "Reflective and formative metrics of relationship value: A commentary essay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 1370-1377, December.
    13. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, 2010. "Reflective and formative metrics of relationship value: Response to Baxter's commentary essay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 91-93, January.
    14. Skiba, Florian & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2008. "Integration of innovative users as source of service innovations," Working Papers 54, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    15. Nick Lee & John W. Cadogan & Laura Chamberlain, 2013. "The MIMIC model and formative variables: problems and solutions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(1), pages 3-17, March.
    16. Cadogan, John W. & Lee, Nick, 2013. "Improper use of endogenous formative variables," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 233-241.
    17. Luo, Mingjie & Ma, Zhuanglin & Zhao, Wenjing & Enoch, Marcus & I-Jy Chien, Steven, 2022. "An ex-post evaluation of the public acceptance of a license plate-based restriction policy: A case study of Xi’an, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 259-282.
    18. Bèzes, Christophe, 2014. "Definition and psychometric validation of a measurement index common to website and store images," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2559-2578.
    19. Fattore, Marco & Pelagatti, Matteo & Vittadini, Giorgio, 2018. "A least squares approach to latent variables extraction in formative–reflective models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 84-97.
    20. Pasquale Dolce & Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi & Natale Carlo Lauro, 2018. "Non-symmetrical composite-based path modeling," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(3), pages 759-784, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • C3 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables
    • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isc:iscwp2:bruwp1307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henrique Monteiro (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uisctpt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.