IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05234723.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does the geographical indications protection policy encourage more sustainable agriculture in the territories? Moving from claims to empirical evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Regolo

    (US ODR - Observatoire des Programmes Communautaires de Développement Rural - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Cédric Gendre

    (US ODR - Observatoire des Programmes Communautaires de Développement Rural - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Thomas Poméon

    (US ODR - Observatoire des Programmes Communautaires de Développement Rural - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

This article aims to assess the impact of the Geographical Indications (GIs) protection policy on the sustainable development of agriculture in mainland France. More specifically, it analyses the impact over the last decade of the increase in the territorial magnitude of agri-food GIs on agricultural economic performance, agricultural employment and agricultural pressures on the environment (biodiversity and water quality). The magnitude of GIs is assessed using two distinct indicators: the proportion of farmers involved in GIs and the diversity of GI products within each territory. We use data at a fine territorial scale (cantonal level – NUTS4) and a meso-economic approach. We estimate a difference in differences econometric model to continuous variables, and we control for the effect of the presence of operators involved in organic farming in the territory, and of payments under the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy, which may impact sustainable development indicators. The results show that, all other factors being equal, cantons where there has been an increase in the presence of GIs over the last decade have seen greater improvements in their economic, social and environmental performance than cantons where there has been no increase. They also indicate the distinct and complementary effects of GI diversity and intensity in the territory, in terms of contribution to sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Regolo & Cédric Gendre & Thomas Poméon, 2025. "Does the geographical indications protection policy encourage more sustainable agriculture in the territories? Moving from claims to empirical evidence," Post-Print hal-05234723, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05234723
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108717
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05234723v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05234723v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chunyan Li & Qi Ban & Jianmei Gao & Lanqing Ge & Rui Xu, 2024. "The Role of Geographical Indication Products in Promoting Agricultural Development—A Meta-Analysis Based on Global Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Luisa Menapace & GianCarlo Moschini, 2012. "Quality certification by geographical indications, trademarks and firm reputation," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 39(4), pages 539-566, September.
    3. Sarah Besky, 2014. "The labor of terroir and the terroir of labor: Geographical Indication and Darjeeling tea plantations," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(1), pages 83-96, March.
    4. Cl'ement de Chaisemartin & Xavier D'Haultf{oe}uille, 2020. "Difference-in-Differences Estimators of Intertemporal Treatment Effects," Papers 2007.04267, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    5. Belletti, Giovanni & Marescotti, Andrea & Touzard, Jean-Marc, 2017. "Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 45-57.
    6. Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca & Defrancesco, Edi, 2021. "How do local factors shape the regional adoption of geographical indications in Europe? Evidences from France, Italy and Spain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Lambotte, Mathieu & De Cara, Stéphane & Brocas, Catherine & Bellassen, Valentin, 2021. "Carbon footprint and economic performance of dairy farms: The case of protected designation of origin farms in France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Deselnicu, Oana C. & Costanigro, Marco & Souza-Monteiro, Diogo M. & McFadden, Dawn Thilmany, 2013. "A Meta-Analysis of Geographical Indication Food Valuation Studies: What Drives the Premium for Origin-Based Labels?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Pecqueur, Bernard, 2001. "Qualite et developpement territorial: l'hypothese du panier de biens et de services territorialises," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 261.
    10. Clément de Chaisemartin & Xavier D’Haultfœuille, 2023. "Two-way fixed effects and differences-in-differences with heterogeneous treatment effects: a survey," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(3), pages 1-30.
    11. repec:ehl:lserod:110767 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Giovanni Anania & Rosanna Nisticò, 2004. "Public Regulation as a Substitute for Trust in Quality Food Markets: What if the Trust Substitute cannot be Fully Trusted?," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 160(4), pages 681-701, December.
    13. Crescenzi, Riccardo & De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero Pineiro, Cristina, 2023. "From local to global, and return: geographical Indications and FDI in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120408, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Stranieri, Stefanella & Orsi, Luigi & De Noni, Ivan & Olper, Alessandro, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Innovation: Evidence from EU regions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. Áron Török & Lili Jantyik & Zalán Márk Maró & Hazel V. J. Moir, 2020. "Understanding the Real-World Impact of Geographical Indications: A Critical Review of the Empirical Economic Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-24, November.
    16. Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca & Defrancesco, Edi & Lombardi, Ginevra Virginia, 2018. "Geographical indications: A first assessment of the impact on rural development in Italian NUTS3 regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 620-630.
    17. Carl Shapiro, 1983. "Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(4), pages 659-679.
    18. Daron Acemoglu & David H. Autor & David Lyle, 2004. "Women, War, and Wages: The Effect of Female Labor Supply on the Wage Structure at Midcentury," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(3), pages 497-551, June.
    19. Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca & Defrancesco, Edi, . "The role of group-time treatment effect heterogeneity in long standing European agricultural policies. An application to the European geographical indication policy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(01).
    20. Bodini Antonio & Chiussi Sara & Donati Michele & Bellassen Valentin & Török Áron & Dries Lisbeth & Ćorić Dubravka Sinčić & Gauvrit Lisa & Tsakiridou Efthimia & Majewski Edward & Ristic Bojan & Stojano, 2021. "Water Footprint of Food Quality Schemes," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 145-160, December.
      • Antonio Bodini & Sara Chiussi & Michele Donati & Valentin Bellassen & Áron Török & Liesbeth Dries & Dubravka Sinčić Ćorić & Lisa Gauvrit & Efthimia Tsakiridou & Edward Majewski & Bojan Ristic & Zaklin, 2021. "Water Footprint of Food Quality Schemes," Post-Print hal-03267194, HAL.
    21. Hilal Mohamed & Leedon Guy & Duboys de Labarre Matthieu & Antonioli Federico & Boehm Michael & Péter Csillag & Donati Michele & Drut Marion & Ferrer-Pérez Hugo & Gauvrit Lisa & Gil José Maria & Gkatsi, 2021. "Organic and Geographical Indication Certifications’ Contributions to Employment and Education," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 161-176, December.
    22. Katja RUDOW, 2014. "Less favoured area payments - impacts on the environment, a German perspective," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(6), pages 260-272.
    23. Emilie Vandecandelaere & Luis Fernando Samper & Andrés Rey & Ana Daza & Pablo Mejía & Florence Tartanac & Massimo Vittori, 2021. "The Geographical Indication Pathway to Sustainability: A Framework to Assess and Monitor the Contributions of Geographical Indications to Sustainability through a Participatory Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    24. Mathieu Lambotte & Stéphane de Cara & Catherine Brocas & Valentin Bellassen, 2021. "Carbon footprint and economic performance of dairy farms: the case of protected designation of origin dairy farms in France [Bilan carbone et performance économique des exploitations laitières : le," Post-Print hal-03021963, HAL.
    25. Carbone Anna & Caswell Julie & Galli Francesca & Sorrentino Alessandro, 2014. "The Performance of Protected Designations of Origin: An Ex Post Multi-Criteria Assessment of the Italian Cheese and Olive Oil Sectors," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 121-140, January.
    26. Laurent Piet & Vincent Chatellier & Nathalie Delame & Philippe Jeanneaux & Cathie Laroche-Dupraz & Aude Ridier & Patrick Veysset, 2021. "Mesurer le revenu des exploitations agricoles françaises : Analyse comparée sur 15 ans d’indicateurs issus du Rica et de la MSA," Working Papers SMART 21-06, INRAE UMR SMART.
    27. Riccardo Crescenzi & Fabrizio De Filippis & Mara Giua & Cristina Vaquero-Piñeiro, 2022. "Geographical Indications and local development: the strength of territorial embeddedness," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 381-393, March.
    28. Giannakis, Elias & Bruggeman, Adriana, 2018. "Exploring the labour productivity of agricultural systems across European regions: A multilevel approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 94-106.
    29. Tim Josling, 2006. "The War on Terroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade Conflict," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 337-363, September.
    30. Leonardo Cei & Edi Defrancesco & Gianluca Stefani, 2018. "From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    31. Chiara Landi & Gianluca Stefani, 2015. "Rent Seeking and Political Economy of Geographical Indication Foods," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 543-563, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca & Defrancesco, Edi, . "The role of group-time treatment effect heterogeneity in long standing European agricultural policies. An application to the European geographical indication policy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(01).
    2. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca & Defrancesco, Edi, 2021. "How do local factors shape the regional adoption of geographical indications in Europe? Evidences from France, Italy and Spain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Guanghao Wu, 2024. "From Soil to Soul: Agro-Product Geographical Indications and the Subjective Well-Being of Rural Residents," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Filippis, Fabrizio De & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Pineiro, Cristina, 2021. "The International Competitiveness of Geographical Indications: Hype or Hope?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315147, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Susana López‐Bayón & Marta Fernández‐Barcala & Manuel González‐Díaz, 2020. "In search of agri‐food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 568-590, October.
    7. Costanigro, Marco & Dubois, Magalie & Gracia, Azucena & Cardebat, Jean-Marie, 2025. "The Information Value of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    8. Leonardo Cei & Edi Defrancesco & Gianluca Stefani, 2018. "From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Daniele Curzi & Martijn Huysmans, 2022. "The Impact of Protecting EU Geographical Indications in Trade Agreements," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 364-384, January.
    10. Ernesto Tavoletti, 2018. "Un?alternativa alla retorica della dimensione aziendale e degli IDE: sistemi agro-alimentari sostenibili di PMI ed internazionalizzazione endogena per mezzo delle indicazioni geografiche," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 27-42.
    11. Takayama, Taisuke & Norito, Takashi & Nakatani, Tomoaki & Ito, Ryoji, 2021. "Do geographical indications preserve farming in rural areas? Evidence from a natural experiment in Japan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Bruno Pecchioli & David Moroz, 2023. "Do geographical appellations provide useful quality signals? The case of Scotch single malt whiskies," Post-Print hal-04144070, HAL.
    13. De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    14. Pecchioli, Bruno & Moroz, David, 2023. "Do geographical appellations provide useful quality signals? The case of Scotch single malt whiskies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    15. Rackl, Jakob & Menapace, Luisa, 2025. "Coordination in agri-food supply chains: The role of Geographical Indication certification," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    16. Duvaleix, Sabine & Emlinger, Charlotte & Gaigné, Carl & Latouche, Karine, 2021. "Geographical indications and trade: Firm-level evidence from the French cheese industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Kyriakos Drivas & Constantine Iliopoulos, 2017. "An Empirical Investigation in the Relationship Between PDOs/PGIs and Trademarks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 585-595, June.
    18. Elena Vigan? & Federico Gori & Antonella Amicucci, 2019. "Enhancement of food production quality: the truffle case," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 21(3), pages 587-611.
    19. Meloni, Giulia & Swinnen, Johan, 2018. "Trade and terroir. The political economy of the world’s first geographical indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-20.
    20. Anna Carbone, 2018. "Foods and Places: Comparing Different Supply Chains," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05234723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.