IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/frz/wpaper/wp2017_14.rdf.html

Geographical Indications: a first assessment of the impact on rural development in Italian NUTS3 regions

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Cei
  • Gianluca Stefani
  • Edi Defrancesco
  • Ginevra Virginia Lombardi

    (Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa)

Abstract

Geographical indications (GIs) are a 25 years old European policy instrument which have, among its objectives, to foster rural development. In this respect, very few studies quantitatively investigate to what extent this policy is effective. Literature is in fact mainly focused on specific GIs, studied through case studies, trying to identify which factors are responsible for the success or failure of specific initiatives. The aim of the present study is instead to quantify the impact of such policy instrument on a single indicator of rural development: agricultural value added. In order to assess the impact we firstly built an index measuring the number of GI schemes implemented at NUTS3 level in the Italian regions. Then, following a difference-in-difference evaluation strategy and relying on an explicit theoretical model, a fixed effect estimator was implemented. The choice of the model, as well as the variables to be considered, is specified using a directed acyclic graph. Results show that an overall positive effect of GI protection on agricultural value added could be identified in Italy, thus providing evidence of a positive impact of the European policy on rural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Cei & Gianluca Stefani & Edi Defrancesco & Ginevra Virginia Lombardi, 2017. "Geographical Indications: a first assessment of the impact on rural development in Italian NUTS3 regions," Working Papers - Economics wp2017_14.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    • Handle: RePEc:frz:wpaper:wp2017_14.rdf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.disei.unifi.it/upload/sub/pubblicazioni/repec/pdf/wp14_2017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Roberto Manno & Marco Tappi & Emilia Lamonaca, 2022. "Trademarks and Territorial Marketing: Retrospective and Prospective Analyses of the trademark Prodotti di Qualità," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 24(1), pages 1-37.
    3. Guanghao Wu, 2024. "From Soil to Soul: Agro-Product Geographical Indications and the Subjective Well-Being of Rural Residents," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca & Defrancesco, Edi, 2021. "How do local factors shape the regional adoption of geographical indications in Europe? Evidences from France, Italy and Spain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2023. "Taste of home: Birth town bias in Geographical Indications," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp23089, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    6. Duan, Wenqi & Jiang, Mingming & Qi, Jianhong, 2024. "Agricultural certification, market access and rural economic growth: Evidence from poverty-stricken counties in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 99-114.
    7. Elina De Simone & Mara Giua & Cristina Vaquero-Piñeiro, 2024. "Eat, visit, love. World heritage list and geographical indications: Joint acknowledgement and consistency as drivers of tourism attractiveness in Italy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(6), pages 1531-1556, September.
    8. Martina Slámová & Ingrid Belčáková, 2019. "The Role of Small Farm Activities for the Sustainable Management of Agricultural Landscapes: Case Studies from Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Jianwu Qi & Wei Li & Zongxiang Wang & Haozhou Fang, 2021. "Measurement and Path Selection of Rural Development Level in Enclave Areas: A Case Study of Jingyuan County, Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Zhiyan Ma & Guanghua Qiao, 2024. "Can Creating an Agro-Product Regional Public Brand Improve the Ability of Farmers to Sustainably Increase Their Revenue?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Regolo, Julie & Gendre, Cédric & Poméon, Thomas, 2025. "Does the geographical indications protection policy encourage more sustainable agriculture in the territories? Moving from claims to empirical evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    12. Guanghao Li & Guanyi Yin & Wei Wei & Qingzhi Sun & Zhan Zhang & Shenghao Zhu, 2024. "The Prohibition of Forestation on Cultivated Land in China: A Difference-in-Differences Model Analysis of the Effects of Cutting Down Trees on Farmland Transfer," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Claire Bernard-Mongin & Jimmy Balouzat & Elise Chau & Alice Garnier & Stéphanie Lequin & François Lerin & Ahmet Veliji, 2021. "Geographical Indication Building Process for Sharr Cheese (Kosovo): “Inside Insights” on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Filippis, Fabrizio De & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Pineiro, Cristina, 2021. "The International Competitiveness of Geographical Indications: Hype or Hope?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315147, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Leonardo Cei & Edi Defrancesco & Gianluca Stefani, 2018. "From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Celso Lopes & João Leitão & Juan Rengifo-Gallego, 2022. "Place-Branded Foods with Responsible and Sustainable Management: A La Carte Serving in Regional Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, May.
    17. Takayama, Taisuke & Norito, Takashi & Nakatani, Tomoaki & Ito, Ryoji, 2021. "Do geographical indications preserve farming in rural areas? Evidence from a natural experiment in Japan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    18. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2024. "Political favouritism and inefficient management: Policy-makers’ birth town bias in EU quality certifications," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 683-702.
    19. Áron Török & Lili Jantyik & Zalán Márk Maró & Hazel V. J. Moir, 2020. "Understanding the Real-World Impact of Geographical Indications: A Critical Review of the Empirical Economic Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-24, November.
    20. Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca & Defrancesco, Edi, . "The role of group-time treatment effect heterogeneity in long standing European agricultural policies. An application to the European geographical indication policy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(01).
    21. Costanigro, Marco & Dubois, Magalie & Gracia, Azucena & Cardebat, Jean-Marie, 2025. "The Information Value of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    22. Julie Regolo & Cédric Gendre & Thomas Poméon, 2025. "Does the geographical indications protection policy encourage more sustainable agriculture in the territories? Moving from claims to empirical evidence," Post-Print hal-05234723, HAL.
    23. Giang Hoang & Ha Thu Thi Le & Anh Hoang Nguyen & Quyen Mai Thi Dao, 2020. "The Impact of Geographical Indications on Sustainable Rural Development: A Case Study of the Vietnamese Cao Phong Orange," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    24. Maria Lisa Clodoveo & Ahmed Yangui & Mahdi Fendri & Simona Giordano & Pasquale Crupi & Filomena Corbo, 2021. "Protected Geographical Indications for EVOO in Tunisia: Towards Environmental, Social, and Economic Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-29, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:frz:wpaper:wp2017_14.rdf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Ricchiuti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/defirit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.