IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Inflation persistence – a disaggregated approach

Listed author(s):
  • Agnieszka Leszczynska
  • Katarzyna Hertel
Registered author(s):

    Inflation persistence and its role for efficient monetary policy has been given a lot of attention in empirical literature. The main contribution has been made by the Inflation Persistence Network, seeking to assess the level of persistence in the euro zone countries, the influence of the Monetary Union for the inflation persistence heterogeneity within countries and categories of products (see: Altissimo, Mojon, Zaffaroni, 2009). The research concerning New Member States started to appear later on and concentrates mostly on the comparison of the level of inflation persistence among NMS (or individual country analysis), eventually correlating it to the level of inflation (see eg. Franta, Saxa, Smidkova, 2010). Our contribution to the subject is the evaluation of persistence not only in the inflation aggregate in Poland, but also in the disaggregated components of Polish CPI in the aim of discerning sectors which contribute to the largest extent to persistence of headline inflation. We are also interested in assessing whether the adoption of direct inflation targeting in Poland (and the decrease in the targeted value of inflation) contributed to the decrease in persistence and, given the sustained high level of inflation in recent years in Poland, whether it was due to the local increase in the level of persistence (which could make the monetary policy reaction less effective) or to other factors, unrelated to the response of inflation to shocks. The measures of inflation persistence used in the exercise rely solely on time series methods (see: Marques, 2004, Pivetta, Reis, 2007 and Baillie, 1996) and are applied to Polish CPI and its 11 components (CPI ex. food and energy, food and non-alcoholic beverages, processed food, unprocessed food, energy, goods, services, CPI ex. administered prices, administered prices, administered energy, administered services, m-o-m, SA). We avoid structural methods such as New Keynesian Phillips Curve (Gali, Gertler, 1999), which, on one hand, provide information on the sources of persistence (intrinsic or inherited from the developments of economic activity), but on the other are highly dependent on estimating disaggregated output gap. In the first part of the research, to check if the inflation persistence in some sub-categories of CPI is not infinite, we conduct the unit root/stationarity tests. The results of the ADF/PP tests suggest that all of the series are stationary, but the KPSS test casts some uncertainty to those findings in the case of some series, leaving room for the fractional integration analysis, presented in the second part of the research. Meanwhile, still in the framework of linear univariate AR modelling, several persistence measures are calculated in the 9-year rolling windows for all of the series in the aim of assessing and comparing the inflation persistence level and dynamics in the defined sectors. The measures are as follows: sum of autoregressive coefficients, largest autoregressive root, half-life. In this context, the sectors with the highest persistence are core inflation and its components – goods and services as well as administered prices and processed food. There is also evidence of the decrease in persistence, the most apparent in the case of core inflation and its components as well as in the aggregate CPI. The only component where an increase in persistence can be observed are administered services. To check the robustness of the results above (the uncertain results of unit root/stationarity tests inter alia) and to verify the hypothesis that structural changes may have influence on the level of persistence in the context of changing monetary policy environment, the unit root test assuming a potential structural break has been carried on (Zivot-Andrews). The break date was defined endogenously, allowing us to confirm or reject our a priori statements about the possible impact of a shift in monetary policy strategy on the inflation developments. The significance of the break in mean was checked with the Chow stability test. The following results emerged: firstly, in average the level of persistence in the models with break in mean is lower than in models not accounting for the break. However, in case of some of the series the difference is negligible, especially in the second part of the sample. Secondly, in most cases the decrease in persistence is negligible. This is an argument confirming the hypothesis that higher level of inflation in the first part of the sample is contributing to artificially oversizing the persistence measured in the simple AR framework. The largest difference in comparison to the results without the break can be observed once again in the case of core inflation and its components (goods as well as services) and in administered prices. The highest level of persistence can now be stated in the processed food and administered services (in the second part of the sample), the lowest still in the energy sector (also in its administered component) and unprocessed food, which is a result often quoted in the literature (see eg. Bilke, 2005). The second part of the research refers to the discussion and to some empirical evidence (see Gadea, Mayoral, 2006) that inflation process may also be characterised by fractional integration. This assumption leads to a different set of persistence measures than the univariate AR analysis. Firstly, the value of integration (or “memory”) parameter bears information about the duration of a shock, its influence on the series level in the medium and long run and, as such, has been used in our research as one of persistence measures. Both Geweke-Porter-Hudak and local Whittle estimator have been used to evaluate the memory parameter. Secondly, the values of impulse-response function for 3 and 12 months, have been used to illustrate the differences between two alternative specifications and to compare different model specifications. The conclusions stemming from this analysis are the following: firstly, the estimates of the level of persistence confirm in general the results found in the univariate AR analysis. The highest medium and long term persistence can be observed in core inflation and its both components, as well as in the administered prices, the lowest – in the unprocessed food prices, food & beverages and energy (in the case of Whittle estimator). This finding confirms the usefulness of the core inflation aggregate (CPI ex. food and energy) as an inflation measure concentrating mostly on the most persistent CPI components (see eg. Walsh, 2011). Secondly, the rolling sample estimation showed that in case of almost all the series a decrease of level of integration parameter can be observed. However, its scale depends on the series and the estimator of d. The largest changes are detected in case of the overall CPI, CPI ex. administered prices and the prices of goods . The last step consisted of discriminating between the alternative specifications, AR including the break in mean and the fractional integration process, using appropriate statistical tests. In this purpose a test of I(d) vs. I(0) with structural breaks, proposed by Dolado, Gonzalo, Mayoral (2006), has been applied. In the case of series that did not display a statistically significant break in mean an appropriate version of the test above and the EFDF test (Dolado, Gonzalo, Mayoral, 2009) has been used to check whether the hypothesis of fractional integration is acceptable or not. It appears that fractional integration can be a better specification for the series of: CPI, food, energy, CPI ex. administered prices and administered services. Other series are better described as I(0) processes with break in mean (except from administered energy which seems to be an I(0) process) and as such can be modeled within the AR framework. See above See above

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by EcoMod in its series EcoMod2013 with number 5692.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 21 Jun 2013
    Handle: RePEc:ekd:004912:5692
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    351 Pleasant Street, #357, Northampton MA 01060-3900 USA

    Phone: +1 413 586 3203
    Fax: +1 413 517 0900
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Stephen G. Cecchetti & Guy Debelle, 2006. "Has the inflation process changed?," Economic Policy, CEPR;CES;MSH, vol. 21(46), pages 311-352, 04.
    2. Jan Babecký & Fabrizio Coricelli & Roman Horváth, 2009. "Assessing Inflation Persistence: Micro Evidence on an Inflation Targeting Economy," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 59(2), pages 102-127, June.
    3. Russell, Bill & Banerjee, Anindya, 2008. "The long-run Phillips curve and non-stationary inflation," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 1792-1815, December.
    4. Carlos Robalo Marques, 2005. "Inflation persistence: facts or artefacts?," Economic Bulletin and Financial Stability Report Articles, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    5. Filippo Altissimo & Michael Ehrmann & Frank Smets, 2006. "Inflation persistence and price-setting behaviour in the euro area – a summary of the IPN evidence," Occasional Paper Series 46, European Central Bank.
    6. Gali, Jordi & Gertler, Mark, 1999. "Inflation dynamics: A structural econometric analysis," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 195-222, October.
    7. Filippo Altissimo & Laurent Bilke & Andrew Levin & Thomas Mathä & Benoit Mojon, 2006. "Sectoral and Aggregate Inflation Dynamics in the Euro Area," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 4(2-3), pages 585-593, 04-05.
    8. Phillips, P C B, 1991. "To Criticize the Critics: An Objective Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Trends," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(4), pages 333-364, Oct.-Dec..
    9. Carl E. Walsh, 2009. "Inflation Targeting: What Have We Learned?," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 195-233, 08.
    10. María Dolores Gadea & Laura Mayoral, 2006. "The Persistence of Inflation in OECD Countries: A Fractionally Integrated Approach," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 2(1), March.
    11. Joanne Cutler, 2001. "Core Inflation in the UK," Discussion Papers 03, Monetary Policy Committee Unit, Bank of England.
    12. Hassler, Uwe & Wolters, Jurgen, 1995. "Long Memory in Inflation Rates: International Evidence," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 13(1), pages 37-45, January.
    13. Meller, Barbara & Nautz, Dieter, 2009. "The impact of the European Monetary Union on inflation persistence in the euro area," Discussion Papers 2009/8, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    14. James P Walsh, 2011. "Reconsidering the Role of Food Prices in Inflation," IMF Working Papers 11/71, International Monetary Fund.
    15. DeJong, David N. & Whiteman, Charles H., 1991. "Reconsidering 'trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series'," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 221-254, October.
    16. Emmanuel Dhyne & Luis J. Alvarez & Herve Le Bihan & Giovanni Veronese & Daniel Dias & Johannes Hoffmann & Nicole Jonker & Patrick Lunnemann & Fabio Rumler & Jouko Vilmunen, 2006. "Price Changes in the Euro Area and the United States: Some Facts from Individual Consumer Price Data," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(2), pages 171-192, Spring.
    17. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1972. "Expectations and the neutrality of money," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 103-124, April.
    18. Wolters Maik H. & Tillmann Peter, 2015. "The changing dynamics of US inflation persistence: a quantile regression approach," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 161-182, April.
    19. Westelius, Niklas J., 2005. "Discretionary monetary policy and inflation persistence," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 477-496, March.
    20. Berben, Robert-Paul & Mestre, Ricardo & Mitrakos, Theodoros & Morgan, Julian & Zonzilos, Nikolaos G., 2005. "Inflation persistence in structural macroeconomic models (RG10)," Working Paper Series 521, European Central Bank.
    21. Laura Mayoral, 2005. "Is the observed persistence spurious? A test for fractional integration versus short memory and structural breaks," Economics Working Papers 956, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    22. Altissimo, Filippo & Mojon, Benoit & Zaffaroni, Paolo, 2009. "Can aggregation explain the persistence of inflation?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 231-241, March.
    23. Stock, James H., 1991. "Confidence intervals for the largest autoregressive root in U.S. macroeconomic time series," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 435-459, December.
    24. Juan J. Dolado & Jesús Gonzalo & Laura Mayoral, 2005. "What is What? A Simple Time-Domain Test of Long-memory vs. Structural Breaks," Working Papers 258, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
    25. Fuhrer, Jeffrey C., 2010. "Inflation Persistence," Handbook of Monetary Economics,in: Benjamin M. Friedman & Michael Woodford (ed.), Handbook of Monetary Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 9, pages 423-486 Elsevier.
    26. Baillie, Richard T., 1996. "Long memory processes and fractional integration in econometrics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 5-59, July.
    27. Pivetta, Frederic & Reis, Ricardo, 2007. "The persistence of inflation in the United States," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 1326-1358, April.
    28. Nelson, Charles R. & Plosser, Charles I., 1982. "Trends and random walks in macroeconmic time series : Some evidence and implications," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 139-162.
    29. Bilke, Laurent, 2005. "Break in the mean and persistence of inflation: a sectoral analysis of French CPI," Working Paper Series 463, European Central Bank.
    30. Galí, Jordi & Gertler, Mark, 1999. "Inflation Dynamics: A Structural Economic Analysis," CEPR Discussion Papers 2246, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    31. Andrews, Donald W K, 1993. "Exactly Median-Unbiased Estimation of First Order Autoregressive/Unit Root Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 139-165, January.
    32. Bilke, L., 2005. "Break in the Mean and Persistence of Inflation: a Sectoral Analysis of French CPI," Working papers 122, Banque de France.
    33. Jeff Fuhrer & George Moore, 1995. "Inflation Persistence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 110(1), pages 127-159.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:004912:5692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Theresa Leary)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.