IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v104y2022i3p501-509.html

Interpreting OLS Estimands When Treatment Effects Are Heterogeneous: Smaller Groups Get Larger Weights

Author

Listed:
  • Tymon Słoczyński

Abstract

Applied work often studies the effect of a binary variable ("treatment") using linear models with additive effects. I study the interpretation of the OLS estimands in such models when treatment effects are heterogeneous. I show that the treatment coefficient is a convex combination of two parameters, which under certain conditions can be interpreted as the average treatment effects on the treated and untreated. The weights on these parameters are inversely related to the proportion of observations in each group. Reliance on these implicit weights can have serious consequences for applied work, as I illustrate with two well-known applications. I develop simple diagnostic tools that empirical researchers can use to avoid potential biases. Software for implementing these methods is available in R and Stata. In an important special case, my diagnostics require only the knowledge of the proportion of treated units.

Suggested Citation

  • Tymon Słoczyński, 2022. "Interpreting OLS Estimands When Treatment Effects Are Heterogeneous: Smaller Groups Get Larger Weights," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(3), pages 501-509, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:104:y:2022:i:3:p:501-509
    DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00953
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/rest_a_00953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:osf:socarx:xzs8r_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mogstad, Magne & Torgovitsky, Alexander, 2024. "Instrumental variables with unobserved heterogeneity in treatment effects," Handbook of Labor Economics,, Elsevier.
    3. Silvia Beghelli & Augustin De Coulon & Mary O’Mahony, 2023. "Health benefits of reducing aircraft pollution: evidence from changes in flight paths," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 2581-2607, October.
    4. Tasos Kitsos & Max Nathan & Diana Gutiérrez-Posada, 2025. "Don’t Shoot the Pianist: Creative Firms, Workers, and Neighborhood Gentrification," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 101(1), pages 60-85, January.
    5. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    6. Florian Léon & Laurent Weill, 2024. "Elections hinder firms' access to credit," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 73-107, January.
    7. Jiang, Lingqing & Zhu, Zhen, 2022. "Information exchange and multiple peer groups: A natural experiment in an online community," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 543-562.
    8. Sandeep Devanatha Pillai & Brent Goldfarb & David Kirsch, 2024. "Lovely and likely: Using historical methods to improve inference to the best explanation in strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1539-1566, August.
    9. Vinayak Krishnatri & Sukumar Vellakkal, 2026. "Does Alcohol Prohibition Improve Caloric and Macronutrient Intake From Healthy Food Sources? Evidence From Bihar, India," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 57(1), January.
    10. Siying Yang & Dawei Feng & Junbing Xu, 2023. "Do chairmen with China's Great Famine experience in early‐life affect firm tax avoidance activities?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 2214-2247, November.
    11. Jamie Bologna Pavlik & Justin T. Callais, 2025. "Good for the goose, bad for the gander? Corruption and income inequality," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 91(3), pages 850-880, January.
    12. Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham & Peter Hull & Michal Kolesár, 2024. "Contamination Bias in Linear Regressions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(12), pages 4015-4051, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • C31 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions; Social Interaction Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:104:y:2022:i:3:p:501-509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.