IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i4d10.1007_s13132-024-01887-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing Innovation and Efficiency: The Impact of Mixed Ownership Reform on Total Factor Productivity in Monopolized and Competitive Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Gong Zhang

    (Jilin University of Finance and Economics)

  • Shi Chen

    (Northeast Forestry University)

  • Hongduo Yan

    (Party School of CPC Changchun Municipal Committee)

Abstract

This paper examines the transformative impact of mixed ownership reform on total factor productivity (TFP) across monopolized and competitive industries. Utilizing a robust double-difference and moderating effect model, the study dissects the diverse effects of these reforms, initiated by key global events such as British Telecom’s 1984 stock offering and Japan’s Nippon Telegraph public offerings in 1987. The paper offers a unique perspective on China’s 2013 mixed ownership reform, evaluating its extensive impact on corporate efficiency in various industrial sectors. Our findings highlight a notable enhancement in TFP, especially within monopolized sectors characterized by regulatory burdens and managerial inefficiencies. The study illuminates the nuanced roles of innovation and social responsibility in these dynamics, showing that monopolized industries respond more strongly to these factors than their competitive counterparts. The empirical analysis, grounded in data from 2008 to 2019, reveals that mixed ownership reform fosters innovation and enforces social responsibility, leading to improved productivity, particularly in monopolized industries. The paper contributes to the theoretical understanding of mixed ownership reforms, challenging one-size-fits-all notions and emphasizing the need for industry-specific approaches. It also underscores the complex interplay between social responsibility, innovation, and the effectiveness of these reforms. For policymakers and industry leaders, this study offers valuable insights for tailoring mixed ownership reforms, highlighting the potential of such initiatives to promote sustainable development and enhance overall economic welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Gong Zhang & Shi Chen & Hongduo Yan, 2024. "Balancing Innovation and Efficiency: The Impact of Mixed Ownership Reform on Total Factor Productivity in Monopolized and Competitive Industries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 18952-18986, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-024-01887-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-01887-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-024-01887-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-024-01887-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zuguang Wu & Xiaoxuan Hou & Xianglong Meng & Meng Wang, 2023. "Mixed Ownership Reform, Government Intervention, and Earnings Quality: Empirical Evidence from Pilot Enterprises in China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(4), pages 1129-1139, March.
    2. Guan, Jian & Gao, Zhimin & Tan, Justin & Sun, Weizheng & Shi, Fan, 2021. "Does the mixed ownership reform work? Influence of board chair on performance of state-owned enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 51-59.
    3. Bai, Caiquan & Liu, Hangjuan & Zhang, Rongjie & Feng, Chen, 2023. "Blessing or curse? Market-driven environmental regulation and enterprises' total factor productivity: Evidence from China's carbon market pilots," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Zhang, Xiaoqian & Yu, Mingqiang & Chen, Gaoquan, 2020. "Does mixed-ownership reform improve SOEs' innovation? Evidence from state ownership," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    5. David Tan & Justin Tan, 2017. "Far from the Tree? Do Private Entrepreneurs Agglomerate Around Public Sector Incumbents During Economic Transition?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 113-132, February.
    6. Jovanovic, Boyan & MacDonald, Glenn M, 1994. "The Life Cycle of a Competitive Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(2), pages 322-347, April.
    7. Acemoglu, Daron, 2005. "Politics and economics in weak and strong states," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 1199-1226, October.
    8. Gao, Huasheng & Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Li, Kai, 2018. "Innovation Strategy of Private Firms," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 1-32, February.
    9. Ao, Yibin & Yang, Dujuan & Chen, Chuan & Wang, Yan, 2019. "Exploring the effects of the rural built environment on household car ownership after controlling for preference and attitude: Evidence from Sichuan, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 24-36.
    10. Philippe Aghion & John Van Reenen & Luigi Zingales, 2013. "Innovation and Institutional Ownership," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(1), pages 277-304, February.
    11. Lerner, Josh & Schoar, Antoinette, 2004. "The illiquidity puzzle: theory and evidence from private equity," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 3-40, April.
    12. Yangjun Ren & Xin Zhang & Hui Chen, 2022. "The Impact of New Energy Enterprises’ Digital Transformation on Their Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Mark Armstrong & David E.M. Sappington, 2006. "Regulation, Competition and Liberalization," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 44(2), pages 325-366, June.
    14. Jewellord Nem Singh & Geoffrey C. Chen, 2018. "State-owned enterprises and the political economy of state–state relations in the developing world," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(6), pages 1077-1097, June.
    15. Zhimin Dai & Lu Guo & Qin Luo, 2019. "Market concentration measurement, administrative monopoly effect and efficiency improvement: empirical data from China civil aviation industry 2001-2015," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(34), pages 3758-3769, July.
    16. S. Trevis Certo & John R. Busenbark & Hyun‐soo Woo & Matthew Semadeni, 2016. "Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(13), pages 2639-2657, December.
    17. Reinganum, Jennifer F, 1983. "Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(4), pages 741-748, September.
    18. Yuan Chen & Bingsheng Liu & Yinghua Shen & Xueqing Wang, 2018. "Spatial analysis of change trend and influencing factors of total factor productivity in China’s regional construction industry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(25), pages 2824-2843, May.
    19. Troy Lorde & Tennyson S. D. Joseph, 2019. "Airbnb, technological change and disruption in Barbadian tourism: a theoretical framework," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(12), pages 2190-2209, December.
    20. Chen, Yvonne Jie & Li, Pei & Lu, Yi, 2018. "Career concerns and multitasking local bureaucrats: Evidence of a target-based performance evaluation system in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 84-101.
    21. Tan, Yongxian & Tian, Xuan & Zhang, Xinde & Zhao, Hailong, 2020. "The real effect of partial privatization on corporate innovation: Evidence from China's split share structure reform," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    22. Chunling Li & Runsen Yuan & Muhammad Asif Khan & Khansa Pervaiz & Xiaoran Sun, 2020. "Does the Mixed-Ownership Reform Affect the Innovation Strategy Choices of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, March.
    23. Aiqing Zeng & Weixian Duan & Xiaoyu Liu & Jianhui Zeng, 2023. "Sustainable Development of State-Owned Enterprises: Research on the Management Transformation Path of Mixed-Ownership Companies from the Perspective of Shareholders Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    24. Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro & Li, Cheng, 2021. "State ownership and internationalization: The advantage and disadvantage of stateness," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    25. Cao, Feng & Peng, Songlan (Stella) & Ye, Kangtao, 2019. "Multiple large shareholders and corporate social responsibility reporting," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 287-309.
    26. Amore, Mario Daniele & Schneider, Cédric & Žaldokas, Alminas, 2013. "Credit supply and corporate innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 835-855.
    27. Tang, Pengcheng & Yang, Shuxiang & Yang, Shuwang, 2020. "How to design corporate governance structures to enhance corporate social responsibility in China's mining state-owned enterprises?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    28. Edward Stringham & Jack Vogel, 2018. "The leveraged invisible hand: how private equity enhances the market for corporate control and capitalism itself," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 223-244, October.
    29. Song, Malin & Peng, Licheng & Shang, Yuping & Zhao, Xin, 2022. "Green technology progress and total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises: A perspective of technical compensation of environmental regulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    30. Ararat, Melsa & Claessens, Stijn & Yurtoglu, B. Burcin, 2021. "Corporate governance in emerging markets: A selective review and an agenda for future research," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    31. Godfrey Yeung, 2021. "Chinese state-owned commercial banks in reform: inefficient and yet credible and functional?," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 198-231, April.
    32. Peng, Jiaying & Xie, Rui & Ma, Chunbo & Fu, Yang, 2021. "Market-based environmental regulation and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese enterprises," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 394-407.
    33. Jan Bena & Kai Li, 2014. "Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(5), pages 1923-1960, October.
    34. Cardinale, Roberto & Belotti, Emanuele, 2022. "The rise of the shareholding state in Italy: A policy-oriented strategist or simply a shareholder? Evidence from the energy and banking sectors’ privatizations," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 52-60.
    35. Zhuo Chen & Daokui Jiang & Guanqiu Qi & Guilin Dai, 2019. "Human resources in the mixed ownership reform of Chinese ports: the mediating effects of organizational commitment," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 453-465, May.
    36. Chkir, Imed & El Haj Hassan, Boushra & Rjiba, Hatem & Saadi, Samir, 2021. "Does corporate social responsibility influence corporate innovation? International evidence," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    37. Megginson, William L. & Ullah, Barkat & Wei, Zuobao, 2014. "State ownership, soft-budget constraints, and cash holdings: Evidence from China’s privatized firms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 276-291.
    38. Vivian W. Fang & Xuan Tian & Sheri Tice, 2014. "Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(5), pages 2085-2125, October.
    39. Jiatao Li & Deborah R. Yue, 2008. "Market Size, Legal Institutions, and International Diversification Strategies: Implications for the Performance of Multinational Firms," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 667-688, December.
    40. Xavier Giroud & Holger M. Mueller, 2011. "Corporate Governance, Product Market Competition, and Equity Prices," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(2), pages 563-600, April.
    41. Runsen Yuan & Chunling Li & Nian Li & Muhammad Asif Khan & Xiaoran Sun & Nosherwan Khaliq, 2021. "Can Mixed-Ownership Reform Drive the Green Transformation of SOEs?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    42. Qiu, Larry D. & Zhou, Mohan & Wei, Xu, 2018. "Regulation, innovation, and firm selection: The porter hypothesis under monopolistic competition," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 638-658.
    43. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Zhong, Qiming & Wen, Huwei & Song, Qinghua, 2023. "Blessing or curse: How does sustainable development policy affect total factor productivity of energy-intensive enterprises?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    44. Sergio G Lazzarini & Luiz F Mesquita & Felipe Monteiro & Aldo Musacchio, 2021. "Leviathan as an inventor: An extended agency model of state-owned versus private firm invention in emerging and developed economies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(4), pages 560-594, June.
    45. Sun, Yutao & Cao, Cong, 2018. "The evolving relations between government agencies of innovation policymaking in emerging economies: A policy network approach and its application to the Chinese case," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 592-605.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yufei & Liu, Deqiang, 2024. "China's mixed-ownership reform and SOE profitability," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 496-520.
    2. Huang, Yi-Hou & Liang, Woan-lih & Truong, Quang-Thai & Wang, Yanzhi, 2022. "No new tricks for old dogs? Old directors and innovation performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Yang, Huan, 2021. "Institutional dual holdings and risk-shifting: Evidence from corporate innovation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Seong K. Byun & Jong-Min & Han Xia, 2021. "Incremental vs. Breakthrough Innovation: The Role of Technology Spillovers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1779-1802, March.
    5. Zhang, Ping & Wang, Yiru & Gao, Jieying, 2023. "Going public and innovation: Evidence from the ChiNext stock market," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 586-613.
    6. Acharya, Viral & Xu, Zhaoxia, 2017. "Financial dependence and innovation: The case of public versus private firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 223-243.
    7. Li, Wencong & Yang, Xingquan & Yin, Xingqiang, 2022. "Non-state shareholders entering of state-owned enterprises and equity mispricing: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Hao, Xiangchao & Sun, Qinru & Xie, Fang, 2020. "Does foreign exchange derivatives market promote R&D? International industry-level evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 33-42.
    9. Wang, Wei & Wang, Hua & Wu, Ji (George), 2021. "Mixed ownership reform and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence of Chinese listed firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Fei Wu & Jing Yu & Yujie Zhao & Donghua Zhou, 2022. "Interim CEO and corporate long‐term investment: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 369-415, March.
    11. Xiangchao Hao & Qingbin Meng & Kaijuan Gao & Kam C. Chan, 2020. "The impact of initial public offerings on innovations: Short‐termism or initial governance force exit?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 924-942, September.
    12. Hedy Jiaying Huang & Ahsan Habib & Sophia Li Sun & Ying Liu & Huiting Guo, 2021. "Financial reporting and corporate innovation: a review of the international literature," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5439-5499, December.
    13. Manuel Ammann & Philipp Horsch & David Oesch, 2016. "Competing with Superstars," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 2842-2858, October.
    14. Guo, Bing & Pérez-Castrillo, David & Toldrà-Simats, Anna, 2019. "Firms’ innovation strategy under the shadow of analyst coverage," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 456-483.
    15. Lu, Yunguo & Zhang, Lin, 2022. "National mitigation policy and the competitiveness of Chinese firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. Giau Bui, Dien & Chen, Yehning & Lin, Chih-Yung & Lin, Tse-Chun, 2021. "Risk-taking of bank CEOs and corporate innovation," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    17. Wang, Rui & Yang, Shijie, 2023. "Credit ratings and firm innovation: Evidence from sovereign downgrades," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Danlin Shen & Carl R. Chen & Xinyan Yan & Zhihong Yi, 2022. "Do credit market accessibility and legal protection shape corporate innovation?," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(3), pages 719-754, September.
    19. Cornaggia, Jess & Mao, Yifei & Tian, Xuan & Wolfe, Brian, 2015. "Does banking competition affect innovation?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 189-209.
    20. Zhu, Hui & Zhu, Steven X., 2017. "Corporate innovation and economic freedom: Cross-country comparisons," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 50-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-024-01887-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.