IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/irpnmk/v22y2025i3d10.1007_s12208-025-00435-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The generosity ecosystem framework (GEF): a comprehensive approach to giving

Author

Listed:
  • Rodoula H. Tsiotsou

    (University of Macedonia)

  • Tali Seger-Guttmann

    (Ruppin Academic Center)

Abstract

Generosity plays a crucial role in addressing economic and social inequalities worldwide. Generosity research has garnered attention from various disciplines; however, to date, it has largely taken a piecemeal approach, focusing on either the generous individual or the recipient. Aiming to fill this gap, we conducted an extensive literature review on generosity and developed the proposed Generosity Ecosystem Framework (GEF). GEF analyzes the interactions and influences of various actors and their outcomes at different ecosystem levels (micro, meso, and macro). The interchange between the micro, meso, and macro levels creates a dynamic ecosystem where generosity is cultivated. Individual actions inspire community engagement, and vice versa, whereas organizational collaborations amplify these efforts within a supportive societal framework. Understanding these interrelations is vital for developing effective strategies to promote generosity at all ecosystem levels. GEF contributes to the nonprofit marketing, service, and business literature by reducing conceptual ambiguity, providing a theoretical foundation for future research, and enabling actionable decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodoula H. Tsiotsou & Tali Seger-Guttmann, 2025. "The generosity ecosystem framework (GEF): a comprehensive approach to giving," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 22(3), pages 489-515, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:22:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s12208-025-00435-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s12208-025-00435-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12208-025-00435-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12208-025-00435-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Pirson & Deepak Malhotra, 2011. "Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 1087-1104, August.
    2. Kandul, Serhiy, 2016. "Ex-post blindness as excuse? The effect of information disclosure on giving," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 91-101.
    3. Rapert, Molly Inhofe & Thyroff, Anastasia & Grace, Sarah C., 2021. "The generous consumer: Interpersonal generosity and pro-social dispositions as antecedents to cause-related purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 838-847.
    4. Boudewijn Bruin, 2013. "Epistemic Virtues in Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(4), pages 583-595, April.
    5. Martha C. Beck, 2012. "Aristotle’s Theory of the Virtues of Temperance, Courage, and Generosity as Part of a Universal Model for Leadership Practices Today," Springer Books, in: Gregory P. Prastacos & Fuming Wang & Klas Eric Soderquist (ed.), Leadership through the Classics, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 147-159, Springer.
    6. Amitabh Anand & Isabelle Walsh, 2016. "Should knowledge be shared generously? Tracing insights from past to present and describing a model," Post-Print halshs-02284055, HAL.
    7. Thomas Biegert & David Brady & Lena Hipp, 2022. "Cross-National Variation in the Relationship between Welfare Generosity and Single Mother Employment," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 702(1), pages 37-54, July.
    8. Carl Mellström & Magnus Johannesson, 2008. "Crowding Out in Blood Donation: Was Titmuss Right?," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 6(4), pages 845-863, June.
    9. Milena Tsvetkova & Michael W Macy, 2014. "The Social Contagion of Generosity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, February.
    10. Biegert, Thomas & Brady, David & Hipp, Lena, 2022. "Cross-National Variation in the Relationship between Welfare Generosity and Single Mother Employment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 702(1), pages 37-54.
    11. Berry, Leonard L., 2007. "The best companies are generous companies," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 263-269.
    12. Finamor, Lucas & Scott, Dana, 2021. "Labor market trends and unemployment insurance generosity during the pandemic," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Christopher Marquis & Matthew Lee, 2013. "Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large U.S. firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 483-497, April.
    14. Elizabeth A. Keenan & Anne V. Wilson & Leslie K. John, 2022. "When Less is More: Consumers Prefer Brands that Donate More in Relative versus Absolute Terms," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 31-43, March.
    15. Lynn, Michael & Starbuck, Mark M., 2015. "Tipping customs: The effects of national differences in attitudes toward tipping and sensitivities to duty and social pressure," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 158-166.
    16. David B. Zoogah & Richard Bawulenbeug Zoogah, 2020. "Benevolence and Negative Deviant Behavior in Africa: The Moderating Role of Centralization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(4), pages 783-813, February.
    17. Wu, Bao & Jin, Chenfei & Monfort, Abel & Hua, Danni, 2021. "Generous charity to preserve green image? Exploring linkage between strategic donations and environmental misconduct," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 839-850.
    18. Christopher Brunt & Gail Jensen, 2013. "Medicare payment generosity and access to care," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 215-236, October.
    19. Nelson, Kenneth & Fritzell, Johan, 2014. "Welfare states and population health: The role of minimum income benefits for mortality," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 63-71.
    20. MacKenzie, Niall G. & Gordon, Jillian & Gannon, Martin J., 2019. "A Spirit of Generosity: Philanthropy in the Scotch Whisky Industry," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 93(3), pages 529-552, October.
    21. Rod Duclos & Alixandra Barasch, 2014. "Prosocial Behavior in Intergroup Relations: How Donor Self-Construal and Recipient Group-Membership Shape Generosity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(1), pages 93-108.
    22. Shih-Ping Jeng & Li-Shia Huang & Yu-Jen Chou & Ching-I Teng, 2014. "Do Consumers Perceive Money-Back Guarantees as Believable? The Effects of Money-Back Guarantee Generosity, Store Name Familiarity, and Perceived Price," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 179-189, September.
    23. Imas, Alex, 2014. "Working for the “warm glow”: On the benefits and limits of prosocial incentives," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 14-18.
    24. Shirley Bluvstein Netter & Priya Raghubir, 2021. "Tip to Show Off: Impression Management Motivations Increase Consumers’ Generosity," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(1), pages 120-129.
    25. Rodoula H. Tsiotsou & Sertan Kabadayi & Raymond P. Fisk, 2024. "Advocating human rights and Sustainable Development Goals: an ecosystem-based Transformative Service Research (TSR) approach," Chapters, in: Olivier Furrer & Mikèle Landry & Chloé Baillod & Jie Y. Kerguignas (ed.), A Research Agenda for Service Marketing, chapter 8, pages 225-249, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    26. Muhammad Aftab Alam & David Rooney & Erik Lundmark & Murray Taylor, 2023. "The Ethics of Sharing: Does Generosity Erode the Competitive Advantage of an Ecosystem Firm?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 821-839, November.
    27. Tsiotsou, Rodoula H. & Boukis, Achilleas, 2022. "In-home service consumption: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 49-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Veronika Pereseina, 2025. "Sustainable Purpose- and Passionpreneurship: New-Age Lifestyle or a Necessity for Sustainable Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Warren, Nathan B. & Hanson, Sara, 2025. "Tipping privacy: The detrimental impact of observation on non-tip responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    2. Rapert, Molly Inhofe & Thyroff, Anastasia & Grace, Sarah C., 2021. "The generous consumer: Interpersonal generosity and pro-social dispositions as antecedents to cause-related purchase intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 838-847.
    3. Zou, Fei & Yang, Mei & Zhou, Yanju & Deng, Yaling & Xie, Baiwei, 2024. "Goal-gradient point rewards can increase consumers' willingness to purchase poverty-alleviating products," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Muhammad Aftab Alam & David Rooney & Erik Lundmark & Murray Taylor, 2023. "The Ethics of Sharing: Does Generosity Erode the Competitive Advantage of an Ecosystem Firm?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 821-839, November.
    5. Daniel Schwartz & Elizabeth A. Keenan & Alex Imas & Ayelet Gneezy, 2017. "Opting-in to Prosocial Incentives," CESifo Working Paper Series 6840, CESifo.
    6. Eleonora Miaci & Raffaele Guetto & Daniele Vignoli, 2024. "Fertility intentions in Italy during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Evidence from the Familydemic survey," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 78(1), pages 222-234, January-M.
    7. Kajackaite, Agne & Werner, Peter, 2015. "The incentive effects of performance requirements – A real effort experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 84-94.
    8. Leipnitz, Sigrun & de Vries, Martha & Clement, Michel & Mazar, Nina, 2018. "Providing health checks as incentives to retain blood donors — Evidence from two field experiments," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 628-640.
    9. Christine L. Exley & Stephen J. Terry, 2019. "Wage Elasticities in Working and Volunteering: The Role of Reference Points in a Laboratory Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 413-425, January.
    10. Milla Salin & Daniel R. Meyer & Mia Hakovirta & Eija Lindroos, 2024. "Factors Associated with the Joint Physical Custody of European Children," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 43(4), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis & Robert Slonim, 2011. "Rewarding Altruism? A Natural Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 17636, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Zeng, Ying & Liu, Xinyi & Zhang, Xinyuan & Li, Zhiyong, 2024. "Retrospective of interdisciplinary research on robot services (1954–2023): From parasitism to symbiosis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. C. Mónica Capra & Bing Jiang & Yuxin Su, 2022. "Do pledges lead to more volunteering? An experimental study," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 87-100, January.
    14. Ek, Claes, 2017. "Some causes are more equal than others? The effect of similarity on substitution in charitable giving," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 45-62.
    15. Lacetera, Nicola & Macis, Mario, 2008. "Motivating Altruism: A Field Study," IZA Discussion Papers 3770, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Linardi, Sera & McConnell, Margaret A., 2011. "No excuses for good behavior: Volunteering and the social environment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 445-454.
    17. Bartels, Lara & Kesternich, Martin, 2022. "Motivate the crowd or crowd- them out? The impact of local government spending on the voluntary provision of a green public good," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-040, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Non, Arjan & Rohde, Ingrid & de Grip, Andries & Dohmen, Thomas, 2022. "Mission of the company, prosocial attitudes and job preferences: A discrete choice experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Christine Exley, 2013. "Incentives for Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Reputations," Discussion Papers 12-022, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    20. Daniel Jones & Sera Linardi, 2014. "Wallflowers: Experimental Evidence of an Aversion to Standing Out," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1757-1771, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:22:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s12208-025-00435-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.