IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/entthe/v45y2021i2p291-318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Can Families Fill Voids? Firms’ Reliance on Formal and Informal Institutions in R&D Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Jasper Brinkerink
  • Emanuela Rondi

Abstract

Firms are more prone to allocate their resources to research and development (R&D) when they are confident about their ability to appropriate the value created through these activities. In this regard, policymakers introduce formal intellectual property rights (IPR) institutions to create an innovation-friendly environment. Less formalized shared values and norms are however likely to affect the extent to which organizations depend on the strength of formal institutions in determining their R&D strategy. Embracing an institution-based perspective on firm-level strategic decision-making, we examine whether the degree to which a firm relies on strong formal IPR institutions in R&D decisions depends on the configuration of informal institutions in its environment, including family and societal culture. We test our hypotheses on a representative sample of privately-held European manufacturing firms and find that the family institution can play an “institutional void filling†role through involvement in ownership and management. This is particularly the case when the firm is embedded in a collectivist culture coherent with the family’s values and norms imbued in the business. Our study offers contributions to the institution-based view, innovation, and family business literatures.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasper Brinkerink & Emanuela Rondi, 2021. "When Can Families Fill Voids? Firms’ Reliance on Formal and Informal Institutions in R&D Decisions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(2), pages 291-318, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:45:y:2021:i:2:p:291-318
    DOI: 10.1177/1042258719899423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1042258719899423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1042258719899423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:45:y:2021:i:2:p:291-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.