IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v199y2025i2d10.1007_s10551-024-05834-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Profit Cap is not yet a General Moral Duty for Companies: A Corporate Social Contract Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Muel Kaptein

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

Abstract

In both the literature and practice, it has been advocated that companies should have a profit cap. Utilizing corporate social contract theory, this article posits that under at least three conditions, companies do not have a general moral duty to cap their profits. These conditions entail that a company adheres to the contracting principles of its stakeholder relationships, that the constitutive stakeholders of the company have not otherwise stipulated in the corporate social contract, and that the macrosocial contract does not prescribe otherwise to the company. The first two conditions are company-specific and hence do not constitute a generic moral imperative, and there is currently insufficient evidence for the third, generic condition.

Suggested Citation

  • Muel Kaptein, 2025. "A Profit Cap is not yet a General Moral Duty for Companies: A Corporate Social Contract Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 199(2), pages 351-364, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:199:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05834-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05834-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-024-05834-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-024-05834-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaptein, Muel & Wempe, Johan, 2002. "The Balanced Company: A Theory of Corporate Integrity," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199255511, Decembrie.
    2. Philippe Aghion & Antonin Bergeaud & John Van Reenen, 2023. "The Impact of Regulation on Innovation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(11), pages 2894-2936, November.
    3. Jyotirani Gupta & Niladri Das, 2022. "Multidimensional corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial performance: A meta‐analytical review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 731-748, July.
    4. Falck, Oliver & Heblich, Stephan, 2007. "Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 247-254.
    5. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard, 1986. "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 728-741, September.
    6. repec:hal:pseptp:halshs-04330712 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Aster Yong, 2008. "Cross-cultural Comparisons of Managerial Perceptions on Profit," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 775-791, November.
    8. Hart, Oliver & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 247-275, November.
    9. Colin Mayer, 2021. "The Future of the Corporation and the Economics of Purpose," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 887-901, May.
    10. Lux, Kenneth, 2003. "The failure of the profit motive," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-9, February.
    11. Colina Frisch & Markus Huppenbauer, 2014. "New Insights into Ethical Leadership: A Qualitative Investigation of the Experiences of Executive Ethical Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 23-43, August.
    12. Jodie Ferguson & Pam Ellen & Gabriela Piscopo, 2011. "Suspicion and Perceptions of Price Fairness in Times of Crisis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(2), pages 331-349, January.
    13. Walton Padelford & Darin White, 2009. "The Shaping of a Society’s Economic Ethos: A Longitudinal Study of Individuals’ Morality of Profit-Making Worldview," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 67-75, March.
    14. Edward Balotsky, 2009. "Where Strategy and Ethics Converge: Pharmaceutical Industry Pricing Policy for Medicare Part D Beneficiaries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 75-88, January.
    15. Halbritter, Gerhard & Dorfleitner, Gregor, 2015. "The wages of social responsibility — where are they? A critical review of ESG investing," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 25-35.
    16. Jones, Thomas M. & Felps, Will, 2013. "Shareholder Wealth Maximization and Social Welfare: A Utilitarian Critique," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 207-238, April.
    17. Basu, Kaushik & Pitsuwan, Fikri & Zhang, Pengfei, 2023. "The economics of profit-cap policy: Big Pharma, Big Tech, and the duopoly rule," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 120-133.
    18. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    19. Alex Edmans, 2020. "Company purpose and profit need not be in conflict if we ‘grow the pie’," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 287-294, June.
    20. Marek Hudon & Marc Labie & Patrick Reichert, 2020. "What is a Fair Level of Profit for Social Enterprise? Insights from Microfinance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 627-644, March.
    21. Ghosh, Dipasri & Ghosh, Dilip K. & Zaher, Angie Abdel, 2011. "Business, ethics, and profit: Are they compatible under corporate governance in our global economy?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 72-79.
    22. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Working Papers 267, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    23. Lee, Jooho, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Stewardship: Why Some Profits Should Be Used to Benefit Others," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(4), pages 525-551, October.
    24. Gregor Dorfleitner & Christian Kreuzer & Christian Sparrer, 2020. "ESG controversies and controversial ESG: about silent saints and small sinners," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 393-412, September.
    25. Emilio Carnevali & André Pedersen Ystehede, 2023. "Is socialism back? A review of contemporary economic literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 239-270, April.
    26. Saerom Lee & Lisa E Bolton & Karen Page Winterich & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Lauren BlockAssociate Editor, 2017. "To Profit or Not to Profit? The Role of Greed Perceptions in Consumer Support for Social Ventures," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 853-876.
    27. Ivar Kolstad, 2007. "Why Firms Should Not Always Maximize Profits," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 137-145, December.
    28. Gerhard Halbritter & Gregor Dorfleitner, 2015. "The wages of social responsibility — where are they? A critical review of ESG investing," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 25-35, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claire Economidou & Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Dimitrios Konstantios & Emmanuel Tsiritakis, 2023. "Is sustainability rating material to the market?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(1), pages 127-179, March.
    2. Michele Fioretti & Victor Saint-Jean & Simon C Smith, 2022. "The Voice: The Shareholders' Motives Behind Corporate Donations during COVID-19 (former title: Selfish Shareholders: Corporate Donations during COVID-19)," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03386585, HAL.
    3. Edoardo Martino, 2022. "Getting bank governance right," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 302-321, September.
    4. Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin, 2019. "From primacy to purpose commitment: How emerging profit-with-purpose corporations open new corporate governance avenues," Post-Print hal-02290622, HAL.
    5. Edward J. Lusk & Osamuyimen Omorogbe-Akpata & Mia Wells, 2022. "Vetting of Bloomberg’s ESG Governance ISS: QualityScore [GQS™]: Discriminant Testing," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(3), pages 39-52, March.
    6. Yanbing Wang & Michael S. Delgado & Jin Xu, 2023. "When and where does it pay to be green? – A look into socially responsible investing and the cost of equity capital," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Fafaliou, Irene & Giaka, Maria & Konstantios, Dimitrios & Polemis, Michael, 2022. "Firms’ ESG reputational risk and market longevity: A firm-level analysis for the United States," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 161-177.
    8. Romec, Arthur, 2023. "Stakeholder orientation and managerial incentives: Evidence from a natural experiment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Kevin T. Jackson, 2023. "Questioning Shareholder Welfare Maximization: A Virtue Theoretic Perspective," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 255-286, December.
    10. Karca D. Aral & Erasmo Giambona & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2023. "Managerial flexibility, capacity investment, and inventory levels," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(12), pages 3890-3907, December.
    11. Tea Gamtkitsulashvili & Alexander Plekhanov & Alexander Stepanov, 2024. "Killing two birds with one stone? Sound investment with social impact," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 617-640, April.
    12. Chen, Gaocai & Zou, Mengqi, 2025. "Industry-specific information disclosure regulation and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Qian, Binsheng & Poshakwale, Sunil & Tan, Yusen, 2024. "‘E’ of ESG and firm performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    14. Małgorzata Janicka & Artur Sajnóg, 2022. "The ESG Reporting of EU Public Companies—Does the Company’s Capitalisation Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Santiago Mejia & Pietro Bonaldi, 2025. "Maximizing Shareholder Welfare: A Normative Examination of Hart and Zingales’ Corporate Governance Account," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 196(2), pages 309-323, January.
    16. John F. Gaski, 2022. "Toward social responsibility, not the social responsibility semblance: marketing does not need a conscience," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 7-24, June.
    17. Ian Taylor, 2023. "Responsible government and responsible business: the challenge of harnessing CSR in a new epoch," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Xin Dai & Feng Gao & Ling Lei Lisic & Ivy Xiying Zhang, 2023. "Corporate social performance and the managerial labor market," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 307-339, March.
    19. Muel Kaptein, 2023. "A Paradox of Ethics: Why People in Good Organizations do Bad Things," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 297-316, April.
    20. Thieme, Lutz & Winkelhake, Olaf & Hartmann, Ulrich, 2014. "Fairness als universelle Norm? Empirische Evidenz ohne Manna [Fairness as a universal norm? Empiric evidence without manna]," Working Papers of the European Institute for Socioeconomics 12, European Institute for Socioeconomics (EIS), Saarbrücken.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:199:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05834-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.