IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v27y2025i2p659-678.html

Budget Disclosure in Crowdfunding: Information Asymmetry and Cost Transparency

Author

Listed:
  • Wayne Fu

    (College of Business, University of Michigan–Dearborn, Dearborn, Michigan 48128)

  • Guangzhi Shang

    (W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona 85287; and College of Business, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306)

  • Xun Tong

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, Netherlands)

Abstract

Problem definition : This paper investigates how a crowdfunding campaign’s voluntary disclosure of sensitive cost information affects its funding performance on Kickstarter—a mainstream, primarily reward-based crowdfunding platform. Instead of enhancing a campaign’s marketing traits, project budget as a novel information-provision tool reminds the crowd of the behind-the-scenes operations for developing and executing a project. This resembles the radical practice of cost transparency recently observed in the retail industry and studied experimentally in the literature. We also separate the disclosure effect on reward seeking versus altruistic pledges and examine how it varies with the structure of the cost items (fixed versus variable costs). Methodology/results : Our data collection follows Kickstarter’s rollout of the Project Budget tool in 2019. The project-level raw data are preprocessed via coarsened exact matching to match projects with and without budgets. We show that the main channel through which budget provision improves funding performance is via attracting additional funding, not by cannibalizing competing projects. Because of the voluntary nature of budget provision, we address the resulting endogeneity issue using peer average-style instruments. Budget provision on average increases funding performance by over 100%, which is more effective than many information-provision tools studied. Interestingly, this funding improvement comes from an increased number of backers (width), not from a higher pledge per backer (depth), and from a considerably higher number of altruistic pledges, not from more reward-seeking pledges. Further, a higher fixed-cost (over total cost) ratio, which is indicative of a higher profit margin, significantly reduces the benefit but does not make disclosure backfire. Managerial implications : Showing the costs to customers can be highly effective in business settings where trust between stakeholders is critical, which implies a promising generalization to donation-based crowdfunding. Our results can also be used to guide a sequential rollout of the Project Budget feature across campaign categories and promote adoption rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Wayne Fu & Guangzhi Shang & Xun Tong, 2025. "Budget Disclosure in Crowdfunding: Information Asymmetry and Cost Transparency," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 659-678, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:2:p:659-678
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.0374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0374
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.0374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duan, Yang & Hsieh, Tien-Shih & Wang, Ray R. & Wang, Zhihong, 2020. "Entrepreneurs' facial trustworthiness, gender, and crowdfunding success," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Elena Belavina & Simone Marinesi & Gerry Tsoukalas, 2020. "Rethinking Crowdfunding Platform Design: Mechanisms to Deter Misconduct and Improve Efficiency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 4980-4997, November.
    3. John Donovan, 2021. "Financial Reporting and Entrepreneurial Finance: Evidence from Equity Crowdfunding," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 7214-7237, November.
    4. Jose A. Guajardo & Morris A. Cohen & Sang-Hyun Kim & Serguei Netessine, 2012. "Impact of Performance-Based Contracting on Product Reliability: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 961-979, May.
    5. Hadar Gafni & Dan Marom & Alicia Robb & Orly Sade, 2021. "Gender Dynamics in Crowdfunding (Kickstarter): Evidence on Entrepreneurs, Backers, and Taste-Based Discrimination [Women on the verge of a breakthrough: networking among entrepreneurs in the United States and Italy]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 235-274.
    6. Lusi Yang & Zhiyi Wang & Jungpil Hahn, 2020. "Scarcity Strategy in Crowdfunding: An Empirical Exploration of Reward Limits," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1107-1131, December.
    7. Qiang Liu & Xiaofeng Liu & Subramanian Balachander, 2021. "Crowdfunding Project Design: Optimal Product Menu and Funding Target," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3800-3811, October.
    8. Jerry Hausman, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    9. James Andreoni & Lise Vesterlund, 2001. "Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(1), pages 293-312.
    10. Xiahua Wei & Ming Fan & Weijia You & Yong Tan, 2021. "An Empirical Study of the Dynamic and Differential Effects of Prefunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1331-1349, May.
    11. John G. Lynch , Jr. & Dan Ariely, 2000. "Wine Online: Search Costs Affect Competition on Price, Quality, and Distribution," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 83-103, April.
    12. Ryan W. Buell & Tami Kim & Chia-Jung Tsay, 2017. "Creating Reciprocal Value Through Operational Transparency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1673-1695, June.
    13. Eric K. Clemons & Il-Horn Hann & Lorin M. Hitt, 2002. "Price Dispersion and Differentiation in Online Travel: An Empirical Investigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 534-549, April.
    14. Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Natalicchio, Angelo & Panniello, Umberto & Roma, Paolo, 2019. "Understanding the crowdfunding phenomenon and its implications for sustainability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 138-148.
    15. Ellman, Matthew & Hurkens, Sjaak, 2019. "Optimal crowdfunding design," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Haipeng (Allan) Chen & Lisa E Bolton & Sharon Ng & Dongwon Lee & Dian Wang & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Sharon ShavittAssociate Editor, 2018. "Culture, Relationship Norms, and Dual Entitlement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(1), pages 1-20.
    17. Ryan W. Buell & Ethan Porter & Michael I. Norton, 2021. "Surfacing the Submerged State: Operational Transparency Increases Trust in and Engagement with Government," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 781-802, July.
    18. Stephen J. Smulowitz & Horacio E. Rousseau & Philip Bromiley, 2020. "The behavioral theory of the (community‐oriented) firm: The differing response of community‐oriented firms to performance relative to aspirations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(6), pages 1023-1053, June.
    19. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    20. Shengsheng Xiao & Yi‐Chun (Chad) Ho & Hai Che, 2021. "Building the Momentum: Information Disclosure and Herding in Online Crowdfunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3213-3230, September.
    21. Bolton, Lisa E & Warlop, Luk & Alba, Joseph W, 2003. "Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 474-491, March.
    22. Peter E. Rossi, 2014. "Invited Paper —Even the Rich Can Make Themselves Poor: A Critical Examination of IV Methods in Marketing Applications," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 655-672, September.
    23. Gad Allon & Volodymyr Babich, 2020. "Crowdsourcing and Crowdfunding in the Manufacturing and Services Sectors," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 102-112, January.
    24. Ming Hu & Xi Li & Mengze Shi, 2015. "Product and Pricing Decisions in Crowdfunding," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 331-345, May.
    25. Moon, Youngme, 2000. "Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(4), pages 323-339, March.
    26. Vaidyanathan, Rajiv & Aggarwal, Praveen, 2003. "Who is the fairest of them all? An attributional approach to price fairness perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 453-463, June.
    27. Pankaj Aggarwal & Meng Zhang, 2006. "The Moderating Effect of Relationship Norm Salience on Consumers' Loss Aversion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(3), pages 413-419, October.
    28. Philipp B. Cornelius & Bilal Gokpinar, 2020. "The Role of Customer Investor Involvement in Crowdfunding Success," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 452-472, January.
    29. Robert L. Bray, 2023. "Operational Transparency: Showing When Work Gets Done," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 812-826, May.
    30. Soudipta Chakraborty & Robert Swinney, 2021. "Signaling to the Crowd: Private Quality Information and Rewards-Based Crowdfunding," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 155-169, 1-2.
    31. Ryan W. Buell & Michael I. Norton, 2011. "The Labor Illusion: How Operational Transparency Increases Perceived Value," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1564-1579, February.
    32. Roland Strausz, 2017. "A Theory of Crowdfunding: A Mechanism Design Approach with Demand Uncertainty and Moral Hazard," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(6), pages 1430-1476, June.
    33. Kaitlin D. Wowak & George P. Ball & Corinne Post & David J. Ketchen, 2021. "The Influence of Female Directors on Product Recall Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 895-913, July.
    34. Ruchunyi Fu & Yi Tang & Guoli Chen, 2020. "Chief sustainability officers and corporate social (Ir)responsibility," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 656-680, April.
    35. Bhavya Mohan & Ryan W. Buell & Leslie K. John, 2020. "Lifting the Veil: The Benefits of Cost Transparency," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1105-1121, November.
    36. Jorge Mejia & Chris Parker, 2021. "When Transparency Fails: Bias and Financial Incentives in Ridesharing Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 166-184, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Yang & Zhang, Yu & Lyu, Jiancheng, 2026. "Reveal the new function of crowdfunding: Production risk transfer mechanism," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muneer M. Alshater & Rim El Khoury & Marah Ferdous & Indri Supriani, 2026. "Reward-based crowdfunding: A hybrid review of trends, opportunities, and future research directions," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 1-64, December.
    2. Sıdıka Tunç Candoğan & Philipp B. Cornelius & Bilal Gokpinar & Ersin Körpeoğlu & Christopher S. Tang, 2024. "Product Development in Crowdfunding: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 701-721, March.
    3. Xu, Yang & Zhou, Qiang & Wang, Xu, 2023. "Joint price and quality optimization strategy in crowdfunding campaign," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    4. Tian, Jingwen & Wei, Ju & Fan, Weiguo & Wang, Yafei, 2024. "When crowdfunding meets bank financing: Substitute or supplement?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Sun, Yanhong & Sheng, Yiyun & Yan, Shuai & Zhang, Wei, 2023. "Pricing strategies in reward-based crowdfunding: Whether to introduce price guarantee?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Shengsheng Xiao & Yi‐Chun (Chad) Ho & Hai Che, 2021. "Building the Momentum: Information Disclosure and Herding in Online Crowdfunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3213-3230, September.
    7. Wang, Peng & Ghosh, Bikram & Liu, Yong, 2024. "Marketing strategies in reward-based crowdfunding: The role of demand uncertainties," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 724-744.
    8. Lv, Jiancheng & Bi, Gongbing & Xu, Yang, 2023. "Crowdfunding pricing and quality overstatement in the presence of platform regulation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Xiahua Wei & Ming Fan & Weijia You & Yong Tan, 2021. "An Empirical Study of the Dynamic and Differential Effects of Prefunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1331-1349, May.
    10. Ming Hu & Yannan Jin & Jussi Keppo, 2025. "The Crowdfunding Effects on Venture Capital Investment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7333-7346, September.
    11. Xu, Shengshuo & Ling, Liuyi & Du, Shaofu & Liu, Lindong, 2023. "Crowdfunding or traditional mode? Strategy choices in product selling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    12. Wang, Peihao & Wu, Laurie & Wang, Yuan, 2025. "Illuminating the unseen: How and why operational transparency mitigates customer dissatisfaction in platform-based services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    13. Francisca Jiménez-Jiménez & Maria Virtudes Alba-Fernández & Cristina Martínez-Gómez, 2021. "Attracting the Right Crowd under Asymmetric Information: A Game Theory Application to Rewards-Based Crowdfunding," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Alexandra Mora-Cruz & Pedro R. Palos-Sanchez, 2023. "Crowdfunding platforms: a systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1257-1288, September.
    15. Wang, Xiayang & Sun, Chiyin & Tang, Yanli, 2025. "Understanding delivery delays: The role of private delivery time information in reward-based crowdfunding," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    16. Baile Lu & Shuai Hao & Michael Pinedo & Yuqian Xu, 2021. "Frontiers in Service Science: Fintech Operations—An Overview of Recent Developments and Future Research Directions," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 19-35, March.
    17. Ehsan Bolandifar & Zhong Chen & Panos Kouvelis & Weihua Zhou, 2023. "Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 668-685, March.
    18. Kuan Zeng, 2024. "The role of venture capitalists in reward-based crowdfunding: a game-theoretical analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(3), pages 1741-1775, May.
    19. Xu, Yang & Zhang, Yu & Lyu, Jiancheng, 2026. "Reveal the new function of crowdfunding: Production risk transfer mechanism," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Longyuan Du & Ming Hu & Jiahua Wu, 2022. "Contingent stimulus in crowdfunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(9), pages 3543-3558, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:2:p:659-678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.