IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v199y2025ics0148296325003972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Illuminating the unseen: How and why operational transparency mitigates customer dissatisfaction in platform-based services

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Peihao
  • Wu, Laurie
  • Wang, Yuan

Abstract

Despite increasing consumer demand for transparent service delivery processes in platform-based services, the concept of operational transparency has not received sufficient scholarly attention in the service platform literature. Adopting the concept of operational transparency, which allows customers to observe the details of the service delivery process, our mixed-method research highlights the concept’s prominence in mitigating customer dissatisfaction toward both service platforms and service providers when the service delivery potentially is at risk of falling short. Drawing on signaling theory and equity theory, our research identifies perceived service effort as the key mechanism driving the effect of operational transparency and shows that it operates in a service party specific manner. In line with our theorization, we also showed that the effectiveness of this mechanism is moderated by the presence of service guarantees. These findings offer important contributions to both theory and practice, revealing a promising direction for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Peihao & Wu, Laurie & Wang, Yuan, 2025. "Illuminating the unseen: How and why operational transparency mitigates customer dissatisfaction in platform-based services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325003972
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325003972
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325003972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.