IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i4p781-802.html

Surfacing the Submerged State: Operational Transparency Increases Trust in and Engagement with Government

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan W. Buell

    (Technology and Operations Management, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163)

  • Ethan Porter

    (Political Science Department, School of Media and Public Affairs, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia 20052)

  • Michael I. Norton

    (Marketing Department, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163)

Abstract

Problem definition : As trust in government reaches historic lows, frustration with government performance approaches record highs. Academic/practical relevance : We propose that in coproductive settings such as government services, people’s trust and engagement levels can be enhanced by designing service interactions to allow them to see the often-hidden work—via increasing operational transparency—being performed in response to their engagement. Methodology and results : Three studies, conducted in the field and laboratory, show that surfacing the submerged state through operational transparency impacts citizens’ attitudes and behavior. Study 1 leveraged proprietary data from a mobile phone application developed by the City of Boston, Massachusetts, through which residents submit service requests; the city’s goal was to increase engagement with the app. Users who received photographs of government addressing their service requests submitted 60% more requests and in 38% more categories over the ensuing 13 months than users who did not receive photographs. These significant increases in engagement persisted for 11 months following users’ initial exposure to operational transparency and were highest for users who had experienced government to be at least moderately responsive to their requests in the past. In study 2, residents of Boston who interacted with a website that visualized both service requests (e.g., potholes and broken street lamps) and efforts by the city’s government to address those requests became 14% more trusting and 12% more supportive of government. Moreover, residents who received additional transparency into the growing backlog of service requests that government was failing to fulfill, revealing government to be less responsive, were no more nor less trusting and supportive of government than residents who received no transparency. Study 3 replicated findings from the first two studies and documented underlying mechanisms: operational transparency increases trust and engagement by two causal pathways—through consumers’ increased perceptions of effort by the government and through increased perceptions that engaging with it is impactful. Responsiveness increases feelings of personal efficacy, which boosts willingness to engage both directly and indirectly through the other causal paths. Managerial implications : Taken together, our results suggest that showing more work performed by government—via operational transparency—encourages people to do more work themselves. These results have implications for the design of a broad array of coproductive services where operations are hidden and consumer trust and engagement are critical.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan W. Buell & Ethan Porter & Michael I. Norton, 2021. "Surfacing the Submerged State: Operational Transparency Increases Trust in and Engagement with Government," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 781-802, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:4:p:781-802
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0877
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Basak Kalkanci & Erica L. Plambeck, 2020. "Managing Supplier Social and Environmental Impacts with Voluntary Versus Mandatory Disclosure to Investors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3311-3328, August.
    2. Marc J. Hetherington & Jason A. Husser, 2012. "How Trust Matters: The Changing Political Relevance of Political Trust," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 312-325, April.
    3. Citrin, Jack, 1974. "Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(3), pages 973-988, September.
    4. Ryan W. Buell & Tami Kim & Chia-Jung Tsay, 2017. "Creating Reciprocal Value Through Operational Transparency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1673-1695, June.
    5. Guillaume Roels, 2014. "Optimal Design of Coproductive Services: Interaction and Work Allocation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 578-594, October.
    6. Miller, Arthur H., 1974. "Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(3), pages 951-972, September.
    7. Jorge Mejia & Gloria Urrea & Alfonso J. Pedraza‐Martinez, 2019. "Operational Transparency on Crowdfunding Platforms: Effect on Donations for Emergency Response," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(7), pages 1773-1791, July.
    8. Özalp Özer & Upender Subramanian & Yu Wang, 2018. "Information Sharing, Advice Provision, or Delegation: What Leads to Higher Trust and Trustworthiness?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 474-493, January.
    9. Tim Kraft & León Valdés & Yanchong Zheng, 2018. "Supply Chain Visibility and Social Responsibility: Investigating Consumers’ Behaviors and Motives," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 617-636, October.
    10. Ryan W. Buell & Michael I. Norton, 2011. "The Labor Illusion: How Operational Transparency Increases Perceived Value," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1564-1579, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rakesh Allu & Maya Ganesh & Sarang Deo & Sripad K. Devalkar, 2024. "Technology-Enabled Agent Choice and Uptake of Social Assistance Programs: Evidence from India’s Food Security Program," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1472-1488, July.
    2. Samantha M. Keppler & Jun Li & Di (Andrew) Wu, 2025. "Stopping the Revolving Door: A Causal and Textual Analysis of Crowdfunding and Teacher Turnover," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 1795-1813, November.
    3. Dawson Kaaua & Vanitha Virudachalam, 2025. "Going the Distance: The Impact of Commute on Gender Diversity in Public Service," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 607-623, March.
    4. Wayne Fu & Guangzhi Shang & Xun Tong, 2025. "Budget Disclosure in Crowdfunding: Information Asymmetry and Cost Transparency," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 659-678, March.
    5. Ryan W. Buell & Kamalini Ramdas & Nazlı Sönmez & Kavitha Srinivasan & Rengaraj Venkatesh, 2024. "Shared Service Delivery Can Increase Client Engagement: A Study of Shared Medical Appointments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 154-166, January.
    6. Michelle A. Kinch & Ryan W. Buell, 2025. "Mitigating the Negative Effects of Customer Anxiety by Facilitating Access to Human Contact," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(11), pages 9710-9729, November.
    7. Yuqian Xu & Hongyan Dai & Wanfeng Yan, 2026. "Identity Disclosure and Anthropomorphism in Voice Chatbot Design: A Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 223-241, January.
    8. Wang, Peihao & Wu, Laurie & Wang, Yuan, 2025. "Illuminating the unseen: How and why operational transparency mitigates customer dissatisfaction in platform-based services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. Vishal Ahuja & Yasin Alan & Mazhar Arıkan, 2025. "The Role of Route-Level Decisions in the Efficiency and Resilience of Airline Operations: Evidence from the Wright Amendment Repeal," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 460-478, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan W. Buell & MoonSoo Choi, 2025. "Improving Customer Compatibility with Tradeoff Transparency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1335-1355, February.
    2. Wang, Peihao & Wu, Laurie & Wang, Yuan, 2025. "Illuminating the unseen: How and why operational transparency mitigates customer dissatisfaction in platform-based services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Ruth Beer & Ignacio Rios & Daniela Saban, 2021. "Increased Transparency in Procurement: The Role of Peer Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7511-7534, December.
    4. Xiahua Wei & Ming Fan & Weijia You & Yong Tan, 2021. "An Empirical Study of the Dynamic and Differential Effects of Prefunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1331-1349, May.
    5. Jae Young Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2020. "Examining the Moderation Effect of Political Trust on the Linkage between Civic Morality and Support for Environmental Taxation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Hanu Tyagi & Manuel Hermosilla & Rachna Shah, 2025. "Does Transparency Hinder Technological Novelty? Evidence from Large Pharmaceutical Firms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1415-1432, September.
    7. Michelle A. Kinch & Ryan W. Buell, 2025. "Mitigating the Negative Effects of Customer Anxiety by Facilitating Access to Human Contact," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(11), pages 9710-9729, November.
    8. Shaohua He & Lei Liu & Qi Liu & Shaoling Fu, 2024. "Creating social value through operational supply chain transparency," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2333-2351, May.
    9. Jaeyoung Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2021. "Can Political Trust Weaken the Relationship between Perceived Environmental Threats and Perceived Nuclear Threats? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    10. Nunkoo, Robin & Smith, Stephen L.J., 2013. "Political economy of tourism: Trust in government actors, political support, and their determinants," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 120-132.
    11. Feryal Erhun & Tim Kraft & Sytske Wijnsma, 2021. "Sustainable Triple‐A Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 644-655, March.
    12. Xinyu Cao & Dennis Zhang & Lei Huang, 2022. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Behavior of Online Gig Workers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 2611-2628, September.
    13. Zhiyu Zeng & Nicholas Clyde & Hengchen Dai & Dennis J. Zhang & Zhiwei Xu & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2026. "The Impact of Customer Information on Service Supply and Demand: Evidence from a Large Live-Streaming Experiment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 212-230, January.
    14. Tsz-Ning Wong & Lily Ling Yang & Andrey Zhukov, 2024. "Optimal Disclosure Mandate in Supply Chains," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2024/468, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    15. Karen Donohue & Özalp Özer, 2020. "Behavioral Operations: Past, Present, and Future," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 191-202, January.
    16. Ying Liang, 2016. "Trust in Chinese Government and Quality of Life (QOL) of Sichuan Earthquake Survivors: Does Trust in Government Help to Promote QOL?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 541-564, June.
    17. Zuo, Bing & Gursoy, Dogan & Wall, Geoffrey, 2017. "Residents’ support for red tourism in China: The moderating effect of central government," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 51-63.
    18. Evgeny Kagan & Brett Hathaway & Maqbool Dada, 2025. "Deploying Chatbots in Customer Service: Adoption Hurdles and Simple Remedies," Papers 2504.06145, arXiv.org.
    19. Noam Shamir & Yaron Yehezkel, 2023. "Sales Information Transparency and Trust in Repeated Vertical Relationships," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1660-1676, September.
    20. Basak Kalkanci & Erica L. Plambeck, 2020. "Reveal the Supplier List? A Trade-off in Capacity vs. Responsibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1251-1267, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:4:p:781-802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.