IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v26y2024i2p701-721.html

Product Development in Crowdfunding: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sıdıka Tunç Candoğan

    (NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245, Singapore)

  • Philipp B. Cornelius

    (Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands)

  • Bilal Gokpinar

    (UCL School of Management, University College London, London E14 5AA, United Kingdom)

  • Ersin Körpeoğlu

    (UCL School of Management, University College London, London E14 5AA, United Kingdom)

  • Christopher S. Tang

    (Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095)

Abstract

Problem definition : Crowdfunding goes beyond raising funds. Entrepreneurs often use crowdfunding to solicit feedback from customers to improve their products and may therefore prefer to launch their crowdfunding campaigns using basic versions of their products with fewer features. However, customers may not be persuaded by a campaign if the product appears to be underdeveloped. In view of this tradeoff, a key question for entrepreneurs is how much to develop a product before launching a crowdfunding campaign. Methodology/results : Analyzing a game-theoretical model and testing its predictions empirically, we study (1) how the development level of a product at campaign launch, measured by the initial number of product features, influences whether customers will make comments that help entrepreneurs improve the product; (2) whether entrepreneurs continue to improve the product during the campaign; and (3) whether the campaign is successful. We show that, as the number of product features at campaign launch increases, the likelihood that customers will make comments and that the product will be improved during the campaign first increases but then decreases. Furthermore, the likelihood of campaign success first increases but then decreases with the number of product features at campaign launch. Finally, by analyzing the interactions between customer feedback, product improvement, and campaign success, we show that customer feedback motivates entrepreneurs to improve the product during the campaign. Moreover, entrepreneurs should take account of the initial number of features and customer feedback when improving the product, because otherwise product improvements can harm campaign success. Managerial implications : Our study provides practical insights on how entrepreneurs can use crowdfunding to aid product development and improvement. Specifically, entrepreneurs should avoid overdeveloping their products before crowdfunding campaigns because, as well as decreasing the chance of campaign success, this could hinder their ability to save development costs (e.g., market research costs) through involving customers in product development.

Suggested Citation

  • Sıdıka Tunç Candoğan & Philipp B. Cornelius & Bilal Gokpinar & Ersin Körpeoğlu & Christopher S. Tang, 2024. "Product Development in Crowdfunding: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 701-721, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:2:p:701-721
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.0344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0344
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.0344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mick, David Glen & Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(2), pages 123-143, September.
    2. Elena Belavina & Simone Marinesi & Gerry Tsoukalas, 2020. "Rethinking Crowdfunding Platform Design: Mechanisms to Deter Misconduct and Improve Efficiency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 4980-4997, November.
    3. Brown, Christina L & Carpenter, Gregory S, 2000. "Why Is the Trivial Important? A Reasons-Based Account for the Effects of Trivial Attributes on Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(4), pages 372-385, March.
    4. Svenja C. Sommer & Christoph H. Loch & Jing Dong, 2009. "Managing Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty in Startup Companies: An Empirical Study," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 118-133, February.
    5. Liang Guo & Juanjuan Zhang, 2012. "Consumer Deliberation and Product Line Design," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 995-1007, November.
    6. Christoph H. Loch & Christian Terwiesch & Stefan Thomke, 2001. "Parallel and Sequential Testing of Design Alternatives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(5), pages 663-678, May.
    7. Vish Krishnan & Karthik Ramachandran, 2011. "Integrated Product Architecture and Pricing for Managing Sequential Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(11), pages 2040-2053, November.
    8. Gordon Burtch & Diwakar Gupta & Paola Martin, 2021. "Referral Timing and Fundraising Success in Crowdfunding," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 676-694, May.
    9. Alfonso Gambardella & Christina Raasch & Eric von Hippel, 2017. "The User Innovation Paradigm: Impacts on Markets and Welfare," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1450-1468, May.
    10. Xiahua Wei & Ming Fan & Weijia You & Yong Tan, 2021. "An Empirical Study of the Dynamic and Differential Effects of Prefunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1331-1349, May.
    11. Michael Freeman & Susan Robinson & Stefan Scholtes, 2021. "Gatekeeping, Fast and Slow: An Empirical Study of Referral Errors in the Emergency Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4209-4232, July.
    12. Sanjiv Erat & Stylianos Kavadias, 2008. "Sequential Testing of Product Designs: Implications for Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 956-968, May.
    13. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2009. "Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 8769, December.
    14. Longyuan Du & Ming Hu & Jiahua Wu, 2022. "Contingent stimulus in crowdfunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(9), pages 3543-3558, September.
    15. Gilles Chemla & Katrin Tinn, 2020. "Learning Through Crowdfunding," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(5), pages 1783-1801, May.
    16. Mingfeng Lin & Siva Viswanathan, 2016. "Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1393-1414, May.
    17. Stefan Thomke & David E. Bell, 2001. "Sequential Testing in Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 308-323, February.
    18. Shantanu Bhattacharya & V. Krishnan & Vijay Mahajan, 1998. "Managing New Product Definition in Highly Dynamic Environments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-2), pages 50-64, November.
    19. Niek Althuizen & Bo Chen, 2022. "Crowdsourcing Ideas Using Product Prototypes: The Joint Effect of Prototype Enhancement and the Product Design Goal on Idea Novelty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 3008-3025, April.
    20. Richard F. J. Haans & Constant Pieters & Zi-Lin He, 2016. "Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1177-1195, July.
    21. Volodymyr Babich & Simone Marinesi & Gerry Tsoukalas, 2021. "Does Crowdfunding Benefit Entrepreneurs and Venture Capital Investors?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 508-524, March.
    22. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    23. Moren Lévesque & Maria Minniti & Dean Shepherd, 2009. "Entrepreneurs’ Decisions on Timing of Entry: Learning from Participation and from the Experiences of Others," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(2), pages 547-570, March.
    24. V. Krishnan & Karl T. Ulrich, 2001. "Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 1-21, January.
    25. Tom Fangyun Tan & Serguei Netessine, 2019. "When You Work with a Superman, Will You Also Fly? An Empirical Study of the Impact of Coworkers on Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3495-3517, August.
    26. Zhuoxin Li & Jason A. Duan & Sam Ransbotham, 2020. "Coordination and Dynamic Promotion Strategies in Crowdfunding with Network Externalities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1032-1049, April.
    27. Gordon Burtch & Anindya Ghose & Sunil Wattal, 2013. "An Empirical Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Contribution Patterns in Crowd-Funded Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 499-519, September.
    28. Paolo Roma & Esther Gal-Or & Rachel R. Chen, 2018. "Reward-Based Crowdfunding Campaigns: Informational Value and Access to Venture Capital," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 679-697, September.
    29. Ying-Ju Chen & Tinglong Dai & C. Gizem Korpeoglu & Ersin Körpeoğlu & Ozge Sahin & Christopher S. Tang & Shihong Xiao, 2020. "OM Forum—Innovative Online Platforms: Research Opportunities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 430-445, May.
    30. Saravanan Kesavan & Bradley R. Staats & Wendell Gilland, 2014. "Volume Flexibility in Services: The Costs and Benefits of Flexible Labor Resources," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(8), pages 1884-1906, August.
    31. Choi, Young Rok & Lévesque, Moren & Shepherd, Dean A., 2008. "When should entrepreneurs expedite or delay opportunity exploitation?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 333-355, May.
    32. Gad Allon & Volodymyr Babich, 2020. "Crowdsourcing and Crowdfunding in the Manufacturing and Services Sectors," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 102-112, January.
    33. Ming Hu & Xi Li & Mengze Shi, 2015. "Product and Pricing Decisions in Crowdfunding," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 331-345, May.
    34. Ethan Mollick & Ramana Nanda, 2016. "Wisdom or Madness? Comparing Crowds with Expert Evaluation in Funding the Arts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1533-1553, June.
    35. Bi, Gongbing & Geng, Botao & Liu, Lindong, 2019. "On the fixed and flexible funding mechanisms in reward-based crowdfunding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 168-183.
    36. Gustaf Bellstam & Sanjai Bhagat & J. Anthony Cookson, 2021. "A Text-Based Analysis of Corporate Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4004-4031, July.
    37. Morris A. Cohen & Jehoshua Eliasberg & Teck-Hua Ho, 1996. "New Product Development: The Performance and Time-to-Market Tradeoff," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 173-186, February.
    38. Kuppuswamy, Venkat & Bayus, Barry L., 2017. "Does my contribution to your crowdfunding project matter?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 72-89.
    39. Sreekumar Bhaskaran & S. Sinan Erzurumlu & Karthik Ramachandran, 2021. "Sequential Product Development and Introduction by Cash-Constrained Start-Ups," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1505-1523, November.
    40. Philipp B. Cornelius & Bilal Gokpinar, 2020. "The Role of Customer Investor Involvement in Crowdfunding Success," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 452-472, January.
    41. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2015. "Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 420-445.
    42. Erwin Bulte & Robert Lensink & Nhung Vu, 2017. "Do Gender and Business Trainings Affect Business Outcomes? Experimental Evidence from Vietnam," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2885-2902, September.
    43. Soudipta Chakraborty & Robert Swinney, 2021. "Signaling to the Crowd: Private Quality Information and Rewards-Based Crowdfunding," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 155-169, 1-2.
    44. Roland Strausz, 2017. "A Theory of Crowdfunding: A Mechanism Design Approach with Demand Uncertainty and Moral Hazard," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(6), pages 1430-1476, June.
    45. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Xiayang & Sun, Chiyin & Tang, Yanli, 2025. "Understanding delivery delays: The role of private delivery time information in reward-based crowdfunding," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Sun, Yanhong & Ouyang, Bingqing & Chen, Qiuyan & Yan, Shuai, 2025. "Risk disclosure in reward-based crowdfunding: Voluntary or mandatory?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Yang & Zhou, Qiang & Wang, Xu, 2023. "Joint price and quality optimization strategy in crowdfunding campaign," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    2. Ming Hu & Yannan Jin & Jussi Keppo, 2025. "The Crowdfunding Effects on Venture Capital Investment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7333-7346, September.
    3. Kuan Zeng, 2024. "The role of venture capitalists in reward-based crowdfunding: a game-theoretical analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(3), pages 1741-1775, May.
    4. Sun, Yanhong & Sheng, Yiyun & Yan, Shuai & Zhang, Wei, 2023. "Pricing strategies in reward-based crowdfunding: Whether to introduce price guarantee?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Wang, Peng & Ghosh, Bikram & Liu, Yong, 2024. "Marketing strategies in reward-based crowdfunding: The role of demand uncertainties," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 724-744.
    6. Lv, Jiancheng & Bi, Gongbing & Xu, Yang, 2023. "Crowdfunding pricing and quality overstatement in the presence of platform regulation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Baile Lu & Shuai Hao & Michael Pinedo & Yuqian Xu, 2021. "Frontiers in Service Science: Fintech Operations—An Overview of Recent Developments and Future Research Directions," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 19-35, March.
    8. Wayne Fu & Guangzhi Shang & Xun Tong, 2025. "Budget Disclosure in Crowdfunding: Information Asymmetry and Cost Transparency," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 659-678, March.
    9. Longyuan Du & Ming Hu & Jiahua Wu, 2022. "Contingent stimulus in crowdfunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(9), pages 3543-3558, September.
    10. Alex Murray & Greg Fisher, 2023. "When More Is Less: Explaining the Curse of Too Much Capital for Early-Stage Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 246-282, January.
    11. Wang, Xiayang & Sun, Chiyin & Tang, Yanli, 2025. "Understanding delivery delays: The role of private delivery time information in reward-based crowdfunding," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Xu, Yang & Zhang, Yu & Lyu, Jiancheng, 2026. "Reveal the new function of crowdfunding: Production risk transfer mechanism," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    13. Sun, Yanhong & Ouyang, Bingqing & Chen, Qiuyan & Yan, Shuai, 2025. "Risk disclosure in reward-based crowdfunding: Voluntary or mandatory?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    14. Rohit Aggarwal & Michael J Lee & Braxton Osting & Harpreet Singh, 2021. "Improving Funding Operations of Equity‐based Crowdfunding Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4121-4139, November.
    15. Shengsheng Xiao & Yi‐Chun (Chad) Ho & Hai Che, 2021. "Building the Momentum: Information Disclosure and Herding in Online Crowdfunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3213-3230, September.
    16. Muneer M. Alshater & Rim El Khoury & Marah Ferdous & Indri Supriani, 2026. "Reward-based crowdfunding: A hybrid review of trends, opportunities, and future research directions," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 1-64, December.
    17. Sewaid, Ahmed & Garcia-Cestona, Miguel & Silaghi, Florina, 2021. "Resolving information asymmetries in financing new product development: The case of reward-based crowdfunding," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    18. Tian, Jingwen & Wei, Ju & Fan, Weiguo & Wang, Yafei, 2024. "When crowdfunding meets bank financing: Substitute or supplement?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    19. Felipe, Israel José dos Santos & Mendes-Da-Silva, Wesley & Leal, Cristiana Cerqueira & Braun Santos, Danilo, 2022. "Reward crowdfunding campaigns: Time-to-success analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 214-228.
    20. Francisca Jiménez-Jiménez & Maria Virtudes Alba-Fernández & Cristina Martínez-Gómez, 2021. "Attracting the Right Crowd under Asymmetric Information: A Game Theory Application to Rewards-Based Crowdfunding," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-23, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:26:y:2024:i:2:p:701-721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.