IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9130-d1771868.html

Evolution of the Spatial Network Structure of the Global Service Value Chain and Its Influencing Factors—An Empirical Study Based on the TERGM

Author

Listed:
  • Xingyan Yu

    (School of Business, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China)

  • Shihong Zeng

    (School of Business, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China)

Abstract

With the rapid advance of digital technologies, the service industry has become a key driver of sustainable economic growth and the restructuring of international trade. Drawing on value-added trade flows for five pivotal service industries—construction, air transportation, postal telecommunications, financial intermediation, and education—over 2013–2021, this study examines the spatial evolution of the global service value chain (GSVC). Using social network analysis combined with a Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model (TERGM), we assess the dynamics of the GSVC’ core–periphery structure and identify heterogeneous determinants shaping their spatial networks. The findings are as follows: (1) Exports across the five industries display an “East rising, West declining” pattern, with markedly heterogeneous magnitudes of change. (2) The construction industry is Europe-centered; air transportation exhibits a U.S.–China bipolar structure; postal telecommunications show the most pronounced “East rising, West declining” shift, forming four poles (United States, United Kingdom, Germany, China); financial intermediation contracts to a five-pole core (China, United States, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Germany); and education becomes increasingly multipolar. (3) The GSVC core–periphery system undergoes substantial reconfiguration, with some peripheral economies moving toward the core; the core expands in air transportation, while postal telecommunications exhibit strong regionalization. (4) Digital technology, foreign direct investment, and manufacturing structure promote network evolution, whereas income similarity may dampen it; the effects of economic freedom and labor-force size on spatial network restructuring differ significantly by industry. These results underscore the complex interplay of structural, institutional, and geographic drivers in reshaping GSVC networks and carry implications for fostering sustainable services trade, enhancing interregional connectivity, narrowing global development gaps, and advancing an inclusive digital transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingyan Yu & Shihong Zeng, 2025. "Evolution of the Spatial Network Structure of the Global Service Value Chain and Its Influencing Factors—An Empirical Study Based on the TERGM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9130-:d:1771868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9130/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9130/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baldwin, Richard & Venables, Anthony J., 2013. "Spiders and snakes: Offshoring and agglomeration in the global economy," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 245-254.
    2. Min Guo & Naiding Yang & Jingbei Wang & Yanlu Zhang, 2021. "Multi-dimensional proximity and network stability: the moderating role of network cohesion," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3471-3499, April.
    3. Arthur Huang & Melissa Farboudi Jahromi, 2021. "Resilience building in service firms during and post COVID-19," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1-2), pages 138-167, January.
    4. Luca De Benedictis & Lucia Tajoli, 2011. "The World Trade Network," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 1417-1454, August.
    5. Alexander B. Darku, 2021. "International trade and income convergence: Sorting out the nature of bilateral trade," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5337-5348, October.
    6. Francesco Caselli & Miklós Koren & Milan Lisicky & Silvana Tenreyro, 2020. "Diversification Through Trade," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(1), pages 449-502.
    7. Peter R. Herman, 2022. "Modeling complex network patterns in international trade," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(1), pages 127-179, February.
    8. Saliola, Federica & Zanfei, Antonello, 2009. "Multinational firms, global value chains and the organization of knowledge transfer," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 369-381, March.
    9. Jens Matthias Arnold & Beata Javorcik & Molly Lipscomb & Aaditya Mattoo, 2016. "Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(590), pages 1-39, February.
    10. Claudia Werker & Vladimir Korzinov & Scott Cunningham, 2019. "Formation and output of collaborations: the role of proximity in German nanotechnology," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 697-719, April.
    11. Marina Ehab & Chahir R. Zaki, 2021. "Global value chains and service liberalization: do they matter for skill-upgrading?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(12), pages 1342-1360, March.
    12. Neil Lee, 2024. "Global production networks meets evolutionary economic geography," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 1477-1479, July.
    13. Gerbl, Martina & McIvor, Ronan & Loane, Sharon & Humphreys, Paul, 2015. "A multi-theory approach to understanding the business process outsourcing decision," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 505-518.
    14. Lianyue Feng & Helian Xu & Gang Wu & Wenting Zhang, 2021. "Service trade network structure and its determinants in the Belt and Road based on the temporal exponential random graph model," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 617-650, December.
    15. Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet & Augusto Mussi Alvim & Miguel Atienza, 2022. "Trade agreements and participation in global value chains: Empirical evidence from Latin America," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 702-738, March.
    16. Thomas Elston & Germà Bel, 2023. "Does inter-municipal collaboration improve public service resilience? Evidence from local authorities in England," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 734-761, April.
    17. Zhang, Yihan & Xu, Jinwen & Yang, Wancheng, 2024. "Analysis of the evolution characteristics of international ICT services trade based on complex network," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3).
    18. Baldwin, Richard & Forslid, Rikard, 2023. "Globotics and Development: When Manufacturing Is Jobless and Services Are Tradeable," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3-4), pages 302-311, October.
    19. Keijser, Charlotte & Belderbos, René & Goedhuys, Micheline, 2021. "Governance and learning in global, regional, and local value chains: The IT enabled services industry in South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    20. Zhaohui Chong & Chenglin Qin & Su Pan, 2019. "The Evolution of the Belt and Road Trade Network and Its Determinant Factors," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(14), pages 3166-3177, November.
    21. Dagnachew L. Senbeto & Alice H. Y. Hon, 2020. "Market turbulence and service innovation in hospitality: examining the underlying mechanisms of employee and organizational resilience," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(15-16), pages 1119-1139, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Fuzhong & Luo, Ke & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2025. "How does upstream service liberalization benefit downstream manufacturing firms’ emissions reduction performance?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Suhua Ou & Qingshan Yang & Jian Liu, 2024. "The global production pattern of the semiconductor industry: an empirical research based on trade network," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Tekilu Tadesse Choramo & Jemal Abafita & Yerali Gandica & Luis E C Rocha, 2024. "Economic Integration of Africa in the 21st Century: Complex Network and Panel Regression Analysis," Papers 2410.21019, arXiv.org.
    4. Saka Jimoh Olakunle, 2023. "Digital Technology and Trade Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 22(3), pages 480-496.
    5. Chen, Fenglan & Chen, Xing, 2025. "Mitigating pollution emissions of manufacturing firms: Does input servitization matter? Empirical evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    6. Kim, Dongin & Steinbach, Sandro & Zurita, Carlos, 2024. "Deep trade agreements and agri-food global value chain integration," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. De Nicola, Giacomo & Fritz, Cornelius & Mehrl, Marius & Kauermann, Göran, 2023. "Dependence matters: Statistical models to identify the drivers of tie formation in economic networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 351-363.
    8. Yan, Jingjing & Guo, Yaoqi & Zhang, Hongwei, 2024. "The dynamic evolution mechanism of structural dependence characteristics in the global oil trade network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    9. Huang, Geng & Lin, Xi & He, Ling-Yun, 2023. "Good for the environment? Foreign investment opening in service sector and firm's energy efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    10. Zhao, Guimei & Li, Wenxiu & Geng, Yong & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2023. "Uncovering the features of global antimony resource trade network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    11. Eduardo Hernandez-Rodriguez & Ron Boschma & Andrea Morrison & Xianjia Ye, 2024. "Functional upgrading and downgrading in global value chains: The role of complementary interregional value chain linkages in EU regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2432, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2024.
    12. Ayesha Javed & Rao Muhammad Atif, 2021. "Global Value Chain: An Analysis of Pakistan’s Textile Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(4), pages 879-892, August.
    13. Arjan Lejour & Hugo Rojas-Romagosa & Paul Veenendaal, 2017. "Identifying hubs and spokes in global supply chains using redirected trade in value added," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 66-81, January.
    14. Li, Yunting & Pu, Yue, 2025. "Pattern evolution and dynamic formation mechanism of global scrap copper trade network: Based on temporal exponential random graph model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    15. Pol Antràs & Davin Chor, 2021. "Global Value Chains," NBER Working Papers 28549, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Bosker, Maarten & Westbrock, Bastian, 2024. "The network origins of the gains from trade," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Armando Rungi & Loredana Fattorini & Kenan Huremović, 2023. "Measuring the input rank in global supply networks," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(10), pages 3081-3115, October.
    18. Delera, Michele & Pietrobelli, Carlo & Calza, Elisa & Lavopa, Alejandro, 2022. "Does value chain participation facilitate the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in developing countries?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    19. Ms. Faezeh Raei & Anna Ignatenko & Borislava Mircheva, 2019. "Global Value Chains: What are the Benefits and Why Do Countries Participate?," IMF Working Papers 2019/018, International Monetary Fund.
    20. Liu, Linqing & Shen, Mengyun & Sun, Da & Yan, Xiaofei & Hu, Shi, 2022. "Preferential attachment, R&D expenditure and the evolution of international trade networks from the perspective of complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9130-:d:1771868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.