IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v13y2024i1p1-d1551919.html

The Tariff Liberalisation Policy Nexus with Non-Tariff Measures: Panel Model Evidence in the SA–EU Fruit Products Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Chiedza L. Muchopa

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Limpopo, Polokwane 0727, South Africa)

Abstract

Higher levels of quota granted can induce and increase exports, but the impact is not the same across all tariff lines. Answers are sought to the question of how the level of exports changes as the quota size of tariff rate quotas changes, thus enabling the investigation of whether unilateral quotas granted to South Africa by the European Union have influenced fruit products’ export flows in the presence of non-tariff measures. Drawing on panel data regression techniques, this study observes five fruit products’ tariff rate quotas repeatedly from 2004 to 2021. It also incorporates a variable to capture non-tariff measures based on the data from the WTO I-TIP database. The findings indicate a positive relationship between quota size and exports, further showing that for a given quota size, the increase in exports is small in the presence of non-tariff measures. These findings draw attention to future trade reforms that focus on seeking the expansion of quota size for the most productive tariff lines in terms of export growth while aiming for the simultaneous reduction of non-tariff measures and tariff rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiedza L. Muchopa, 2024. "The Tariff Liberalisation Policy Nexus with Non-Tariff Measures: Panel Model Evidence in the SA–EU Fruit Products Trade," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:1-:d:1551919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Falilou Fall & Katharina Längle, 2020. "Trade liberalisation and product mix adjustments: Evidence from South African firms," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1619, OECD Publishing.
    2. Xiaowei Wen & Zhaohui Yang & Hui Dong & Xinqiang Fan & Yong Wang, 2018. "Barriers to Sustainable Food Trade: China’s Exports Food Rejected by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2011–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Jaime DE MELO & Ben SHEPHERD, 2018. "The Economics of Non-Tariff Measures: A Primer," Working Papers P212, FERDI.
    4. Brian J. Revell, 2017. "Brexit and Tariff Rate Quotas on EU Imports: A Complex Problem," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 16(2), pages 10-17, August.
    5. Ajewole, Kayode & Beckman, Jayson & Gerval, Adam & Johnson, William & Morgan, Stephan & Sabala, Ethan, 2022. "Do Free Trade Agreements Benefit Developing Countries? An Examination of U.S. Agreements," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 2022(Economic ), September.
    6. Luisa Kinzius & Alexander Sandkamp & Erdal Yalcin, 2019. "Trade protection and the role of non-tariff barriers," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 155(4), pages 603-643, November.
    7. Jafari, Yaghoob & Britz, Wolfgang, 2018. "Modelling heterogeneous firms and non-tariff measures in free trade agreements using Computable General Equilibrium," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 279-294.
    8. Beckman, Jayson & Gale, Fred & Lee, Tani, 2021. "Agricultural Market Access Under Tariff-Rate Quotas," Agricultural Economic Reports 308595, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Skully, David W., 2000. "U.S. Trqs For Peanuts, Sugar, And Tobacco: Historical Allocation And Nondiscrimination," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 29(01), pages 1-10, April.
    10. Keck, Alexander & Lendle, Andreas, 2012. "New evidence on preference utilization," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2012-12, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    11. repec:ecr:col025:46014 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Chandan Kumar & Nalin Bharti, 2020. "Why NTM is a Challenge in Trade Relations? Evidence from India–Africa Agricultural Trade," Insight on Africa, , vol. 12(2), pages 79-103, July.
    13. Gianluca Orefice, 2017. "Non-Tariff Measures, Specific Trade Concerns and Tariff Reduction," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(9), pages 1807-1835, September.
    14. Muhamad Rias K. V. Zainuddin & Tamat Sarmidi & Norlin Khalid, 2020. "Sustainable Production, Non-Tariff Measures, and Trade Performance in RCEP Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-12, November.
    15. Wanissa Suanin, 2023. "Processed food exports from developing countries: the effect of food safety compliance," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(2), pages 743-770.
    16. Ajewole, Kayode & Beckman, Jayson & Gerval, Adam & Johnson, William & Morgan, Stephen & Sabala, Ethan, 2022. "Do Free Trade Agreements Benefit Developing Countries? An Examination of U.S. Agreements," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 2022(Economic ), September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beckman, Jayson & Ivanic, Maros & Shaik, Saleem, 2023. "How bilateral trade deals get in the way of multilateral agreements: Why WTO is marginalized," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 877-894.
    2. Padilla, Samantha & Ufer, Danielle J. & Morgan, Stephen & Link, Noah, "undated". "U.S. Export Competitiveness in Select Crop Markets," USDA Miscellaneous 333553, United States Department of Agriculture.
    3. Dela‐Dem Doe Fiankor & Oliver‐Ken Haase & Bernhard Brümmer, 2021. "The Heterogeneous Effects of Standards on Agricultural Trade Flows," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 25-46, February.
    4. Mutanga, Albert & Tagwi, Aluwani Maiwashe & Chipfupa, Unity, 2023. "The EU-SACU Economic Partnership Agreement: Resultant Trends and Patterns an SADC Intra-Regional Agricultural Trade Flows," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 68(2).
    5. Okunola, Akinbode, 2025. "Agricultural Productivity and Trade Liberalization in West Africa," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361171, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Jafari, Yaghoob & Britz, Wolfgang & Guimbard, Houssein & Beckman, Jayson, 2021. "Properly capturing tariff rate quotas for trade policy analysis in computable general equilibrium models," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Muhamad Rias K. V. Zainuddin & Tamat Sarmidi & Norlin Khalid, 2020. "Sustainable Production, Non-Tariff Measures, and Trade Performance in RCEP Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-12, November.
    8. Jayson Beckman & Michael E. Johnson & Maros Ivanic, 2024. "Agriculture and AfCFTA: NTM reductions increase intra‐Africa trade," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 200-222, March.
    9. Mattia Di Ubaldo & Michael Gasiorek & Barry Reilly & Aldo Sandoval-Hernandez, 2025. "Trade and the intensity of product regulation," Working Paper Series 0325, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    10. Agbahey, Johanes & Siddig, Khalid & Grethe, Harald, 2021. "Economy-wide effects of cross-border labor mobility: The case of Palestinian employment in Israel," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 964-981.
    11. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Naoto Jinji & Nuttawut Laksanapanyakul & Toshiyuki Matsuura & Taiyo Yoshimi, 2023. "Quantifying the costs of utilising regional trade agreements," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3542-3570, December.
    12. Zhao, Yujia & McLellan, Benjamin Craig & Wang, Chaofan & Shuai, Jing & Xiang, Wanting & Shuai, Chuanmin, 2026. "Risk dynamics and strategies of China's solar PV industry chain under trade frictions: A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    13. Chuc Dinh Nguyen & Kazunobu Hayakawa, 2024. "The Substitution Effect of Preferential Tariffs on Nontariff Measures: Evidence from Vietnam," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 62(1), pages 87-103, March.
    14. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Fukunari Kimura & Nuttawut Laksanapanyakul, 2018. "Measuring the usage of preferential tariffs in the world," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 154(4), pages 705-723, November.
    15. Gabriel Felbermayr & Hendrik Mahlkow & Alexander Sandkamp, 2023. "Cutting through the value chain: the long-run effects of decoupling the East from the West," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 75-108, February.
    16. Gao, Shanshan & Song, Zhouying, 2025. "Trade frictions on China's photovoltaic trade and their reshaping effects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    17. Kazunobu HAYAKAWA & Naoto JINJI & Toshiyuki MATSUURA & Taiyo YOSHIMI, 2019. "Costs of Utilizing Regional Trade Agreements," Discussion papers 19054, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    18. Doe Fiankor,Dela-Dem & Woubet Kassa & Lartey,Abraham, 2025. "Trade Barriers or Catalysts ? Non-Tariff Measures and Firm-Level Trade Margins," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11024, The World Bank.
    19. Abe,Kenzo & Hayakawa,Kazunobu & Yang,Chih-hai, 2026. "Complying with Rules of Origin and Transfer Pricing," IDE Discussion Papers 989, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    20. repec:ecr:col025:46014 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Nuttawut, Laksanapanyakul & Shiino, Kohei, 2013. "Some practical guidance for the computation of free trade agreement utilization rates," IDE Discussion Papers 438, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:1-:d:1551919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.