IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v76y2024ics0160791x23002555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does ICT diffusion validate skill-biased technological change hypothesis? Evidence from the post-Soviet countries

Author

Listed:
  • Sohag, Kazi
  • Badur, Mesut M.
  • Ameer, Waqar
  • Vilamová, Šárka

Abstract

This study scrutinizes the impact of ICT diffusion on decomposed measures of income inequality in post-Soviet countries. We apply the Cross-Sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lags (CS-ARDL) approach to examine the dynamics of our panel time series data from 1991 to 2019. Empirical evidence suggests that ICT diffusion is negatively associated with the income of the top segments (the top 1 % and 10 %) of the population in the long term, while its impact is insignificant in the short term. Moreover, the ICT diffusion de facto (policy-implementation spectrum) primarily promotes the income share of the bottom class, probably by providing new market opportunities. The spread of ICT, in terms of policy decisions, leads to a notable decrease in the income proportion held by the top 10 % of earners, exhibiting the most significant level of responsiveness. Furthermore, our findings infer that government expenditure can also play a crucial role in reducing income inequality by decreasing the income portion of the top segment. The implications of our findings have direct relevance for policymakers in formulating effective strategies regarding ICT diffusion-income inequality nexus.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohag, Kazi & Badur, Mesut M. & Ameer, Waqar & Vilamová, Šárka, 2024. "Does ICT diffusion validate skill-biased technological change hypothesis? Evidence from the post-Soviet countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x23002555
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23002555
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x23002555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.