IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v148y2025ics0166497225001774.html

What motivates the collaborative innovation relationship in infrastructure projects from dynamic network perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Ruixue
  • Tang, Yuyan
  • Li, Yongli
  • Zhang, Yuanxin

Abstract

The scale and complexity of infrastructure projects, involving numerous stakeholders, present significant technical challenges. To effectively address these challenges, inter-organizational collaborative innovation is essential. However, there is little research on the underpinnings of collaborative innovation relationship (CIR) in infrastructure projects from a dynamic network perspective. This study aims to explore the mechanisms driving the evolution of CIR through longitudinal data from infrastructure projects implemented in China between 2008 and 2023. CIR networks are constructed based on the Derwent Innovation Index (DII) database, and their evolutionary characteristics are analyzed via social network analysis (SNA). A multiple regression quadratic assignment procedure (MRQAP) is employed to examine determinants of CIR networks, with a specific focus on the evolution of both independent and interaction effects of proximity. The results indicate that CIR in infrastructure projects evolves into a hub-and-spoke feature across three distinct stages. Notably, the proliferation of intelligent construction technology emerges as a significant development. Enterprises serve as core players and bridges, while research institutions and universities take the leadership in innovation. Furthermore, the influence of geographical proximity on CIR networks diminishes over time, whereas social proximity becomes increasingly influential. The relationships between geographical, institutional, and organizational proximity exhibit dynamic changes, characterized by both complementarity and substitutability. These findings contribute to the existing literature on dynamic collaborative relationships among stakeholders in infrastructure projects innovation and provide practical insights for enhancing inter-organizational collaboration in such projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Ruixue & Tang, Yuyan & Li, Yongli & Zhang, Yuanxin, 2025. "What motivates the collaborative innovation relationship in infrastructure projects from dynamic network perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s0166497225001774
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225001774
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Omobhude & Shih-Hsin Chen, 2019. "The Roles and Measurements of Proximity in Sustained Technology Development: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Hellgren, Bo & Stjernberg, Torbjörn, 1995. "Design and implementation in major investments -- A project network approach," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 377-394, December.
    3. Pieter W. Heringa & Edwin Horlings & Mariëlle van der Zouwen & Peter van den Besselaar & Wim van Vierssen, 2014. "How do dimensions of proximity relate to the outcomes of collaboration? A survey of knowledge-intensive networks in the Dutch water sector," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7), pages 689-716, October.
    4. Anna af Hällström & Petra Bosch-Sijtsema & León Poblete & Rasmus Rempling & Mats Karlsson, 2021. "The role of social ties in collaborative project networks: A tale of two construction cases," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(9), pages 723-738, September.
    5. Lopolito, Antonio & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Sica, Edgardo, 2022. "The role of proximity in sustainability transitions: A technological niche evolution analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    6. Riccardo Crescenzi & Andrea Filippetti & Simona Iammarino, 2017. "Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 730-762, August.
    7. Jacob Torfing, 2019. "Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, January.
    8. Johan Miörner & Elena Zukauskaite & Michaela Trippl & Jerker Moodysson, 2018. "Creating institutional preconditions for knowledge flows in cross-border regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(2), pages 201-218, March.
    9. Mila Davids & Koen Frenken, 2018. "Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: towards an integrated framework," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 23-34, January.
    10. Liang, Zhiying & Chen, Jian & Jiang, Dayang & Sun, Yunpeng, 2022. "Assessment of the spatial association network of green innovation: Role of energy resources in green recovery," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Roderik Ponds & Frank Van Oort & Koen Frenken, 2007. "The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(3), pages 423-443, August.
    12. Lorenzo Cassi & Andrea Morrison & Roberta Rabellotti, 2015. "Proximity and Scientific Collaboration: Evidence from the Global Wine Industry," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(2), pages 205-219, April.
    13. Dorota Leszczyńska & Nada Khachlouf, 2018. "How proximity matters in interactive learning and innovation: a study of the Venetian glass industry," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9), pages 874-896, October.
    14. Ardito, Lorenzo & D'Adda, Diego & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2018. "Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: Evidence from patent analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 317-330.
    15. Lazzeretti, Luciana & Capone, Francesco, 2016. "How proximity matters in innovation networks dynamics along the cluster evolution. A study of the high technology applied to cultural goods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5855-5865.
    16. Maskell, Peter & Malmberg, Anders, 1999. "Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(2), pages 167-185, March.
    17. Dorota Leszczyńska & Nada Khachlouf, 2018. "How proximity matters in interactive learning and innovation: a study of the Venetian glass industry," Post-Print halshs-01824538, HAL.
    18. Ron Boschma & Koen Frenken, 2011. "The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 295-307, March.
    19. Tom B. J. Coenen & Klaasjan Visscher & Leentje Volker, 2023. "A systemic perspective on transition barriers to a circular infrastructure sector," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 22-43, January.
    20. Deepak Hegde & Justin Tumlinson, 2014. "Does Social Proximity Enhance Business Partnerships? Theory and Evidence from Ethnicity's Role in U.S. Venture Capital," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(9), pages 2355-2380, September.
    21. Agrawal, Ajay & Kapur, Devesh & McHale, John, 2008. "How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 258-269, September.
    22. Hong, Wei & Su, Yu-Sung, 2013. "The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 454-464.
    23. Meric Gertler, 2010. "Rules of the Game: The Place of Institutions in Regional Economic Change," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 1-15.
    24. Geng, Jiang-Bo & Ji, Qiang & Fan, Ying, 2014. "A dynamic analysis on global natural gas trade network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 23-33.
    25. Yaya Li & Yongli Li & An Pan & Xue Pan & Eleonora Veglianti, 2022. "The Network Structure Characteristics and Determinants of the Belt & Road Industrial Robot Trade," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(5), pages 1491-1501, April.
    26. Holmen, Elsebeth & Pedersen, Ann-Charlott & Torvatn, Tim, 2005. "Building relationships for technological innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1240-1250, September.
    27. Zhan Cao & Ben Derudder & Zhenwei Peng, 2019. "Interaction between different forms of proximity in inter‐organizational scientific collaboration: The case of medical sciences research network in the Yangtze River Delta region," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 98(5), pages 1903-1924, October.
    28. Feng, Zhijun & Cai, Hechang & Chen, Zinan & Zhou, Wen, 2022. "Influence of an interurban innovation network on the innovation capacity of China: A multiplex network perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    29. Ejermo, Olof & Karlsson, Charlie, 2006. "Interregional inventor networks as studied by patent coinventorships," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 412-430, April.
    30. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Mathijs De Vaan & Ron Boschma, 2013. "The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: The case of the global video game industry, 1987--2007," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(5), pages 741-765, September.
    31. Chen, Kaihua & Zhang, Yi & Zhu, Guilong & Mu, Rongping, 2020. "Do research institutes benefit from their network positions in research collaboration networks with industries or/and universities?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 94.
    32. Stephen D. Pryke, 2004. "Analysing construction project coalitions: exploring the application of social network analysis," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 787-797, October.
    33. Guan, Jiancheng & Zhao, Qingjun, 2013. "The impact of university–industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(7), pages 1271-1286.
    34. Jacob, Jojo & Duysters, Geert, 2017. "Alliance network configurations and the co-evolution of firms' technology profiles: An analysis of the biopharmaceutical industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 90-102.
    35. Ina Drejer & Christian Richter Østergaard, 2017. "Exploring determinants of firms’ collaboration with specific universities: employee-driven relations and geographical proximity," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(8), pages 1192-1205, August.
    36. Lorenzo Ardito & Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli & Federica Pascucci & Enzo Peruffo, 2019. "Inter‐firm R&D collaborations and green innovation value: The role of family firms' involvement and the moderating effects of proximity dimensions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 185-197, January.
    37. Patrucco, Andrea S. & Moretto, Antonella & Knight, Louise, 2021. "Does relationship control hinder relationship commitment? The role of supplier performance measurement systems in construction infrastructure projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    38. Elia, Stefano & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Piscitello, Lucia, 2019. "The impact of cultural diversity on innovation performance of MNC subsidiaries in strategic alliances," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 204-213.
    39. Haitao Ma & Xuanfang Xu, 2023. "The effects of proximities on the evolving structure of intercity innovation networks in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area: comparison between scientific and technology knowledge," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 390-413, July.
    40. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Nathan, Max & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2016. "Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 177-194.
    41. Miozzo, Marcela & Dewick, Paul, 2002. "Building competitive advantage: innovation and corporate governance in European construction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 989-1008, August.
    42. Katiuscia Lavoratori & Sergio Mariotti & Lucia Piscitello, 2020. "The role of geographical and temporary proximity in MNEs’ location and intra-firm co-location choices," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 1442-1456, October.
    43. Xavier Molina-Morales, F. & Belso-Martínez, José A. & Más-Verdú, Francisco & Martínez-Cháfer, Luis, 2015. "Formation and dissolution of inter-firm linkages in lengthy and stable networks in clusters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1557-1562.
    44. Tom Broekel & Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Martijn Burger & Frank Oort, 2014. "Modeling knowledge networks in economic geography: a discussion of four methods," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), pages 423-452, September.
    45. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & José Antonio Belso-Martínez & Andrea Morrison, 2016. "The Dynamics of Technical and Business Knowledge Networks in Industrial Clusters: Embeddedness, Status, or Proximity?," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 92(1), pages 35-60, January.
    46. Hu, Zhibin & Wu, Guangdong & Han, Yilong & Niu, Yanliang, 2023. "Unraveling the dynamic changes of high-speed rail network with urban development: Evidence from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    47. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
    48. Andre Torre & Alain Rallet, 2005. "Proximity and Localization," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 47-59.
    49. Daniel Nepelski & Giuditta De Prato, 2018. "The structure and evolution of ICT global innovation network," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(10), pages 940-965, November.
    50. Tom Broekel & Ron Boschma, 2012. "Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 409-433, March.
    51. Briseño-García, Arturo & William Husted, Bryan & Arango-Herera, Eduardo, 2022. "Do birds of a feather certify together? The impact of board interlocks on CSR certification homophily," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 336-344.
    52. Haitao Ma & Yehua Dennis Wei & Liang Dai & Xuanfang Xu, 2022. "The proximity and dynamics of intercity technology transfers in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area: Evidence from patent transfer networks," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(7), pages 1432-1449, October.
    53. David Dekker & David Krackhardt & Tom Snijders, 2007. "Sensitivity of MRQAP Tests to Collinearity and Autocorrelation Conditions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 563-581, December.
    54. Morten T. Hansen & Bjørn Løvås, 2004. "How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(8‐9), pages 801-822, August.
    55. Hu, Yi & Xu, Qixiong & Field, Brian & Xia, Bo & Wu, Guangdong, 2024. "Governing collaborative networks in mega transport projects development: Integrative findings from 34 cases worldwide," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 162-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferretti, Marco & Guerini, Massimiliano & Panetti, Eva & Parmentola, Adele, 2022. "The partner next door? The effect of micro-geographical proximity on intra-cluster inter-organizational relationships," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Utku Ali Rıza Alpaydın & Rune Dahl Fitjar, 2021. "Proximity across the distant worlds of university–industry collaborations," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(3), pages 689-711, June.
    3. Sun, Yutao & Jiang, Lin & Cao, Cong, 2025. "Multiple proximities and inter-agency collaboration within a policy network: The case of innovation policymaking in China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Christian Omobhude & Shih-Hsin Chen, 2019. "The Roles and Measurements of Proximity in Sustained Technology Development: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, January.
    5. Cathrin Söllner & Dirk Fornahl, 2021. "Unleashing Inventive Power - Solving cognitive, social and geographic distance issues with cultural proximity," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2103, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    6. Hung, Shiu-Wan & Cheng, Min-Jhih & Hou, Chen-En & Chen, Nai-Rong, 2021. "Inclusion in global virtual teams: Exploring non-spatial proximity and knowledge sharing on innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 599-610.
    7. Utku Ali Rıza Alpaydın & Rune Dahl Fitjar, 2024. "How do university‐industry collaborations benefit innovation? Direct and indirect outcomes of different collaboration types," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), June.
    8. Haitao Ma & Yehua Dennis Wei & Liang Dai & Xuanfang Xu, 2022. "The proximity and dynamics of intercity technology transfers in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area: Evidence from patent transfer networks," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(7), pages 1432-1449, October.
    9. Robert Huggins & Daniel Prokop & Piers Thompson, 2020. "Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 718-757, June.
    10. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Ron Boschma & Koen Frenken, 2020. "Proximity, Innovation and Networks: A Concise Review and Some Next Steps," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2019, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Mar 2020.
    11. Sándor Juhász, 2021. "Spinoffs and tie formation in cluster knowledge networks," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1385-1404, April.
    12. Zaizhou Hu & Zengdong Cao & Anran Du & Qin Tu, 2025. "Where does it matter? Revisiting the role of proximity in knowledge spillovers," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 84(2), pages 297-322, March.
    13. Rune Dahl Fitjar & Franz Huber & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2016. "Not too close, not too far: testing the Goldilocks principle of ‘optimal’ distance in innovation networks," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 465-487, August.
    14. Stefano Ghinoi & Riccardo Vita & Bodo Steiner & Alessandro Sinatra, 2024. "Family firm network strategies in regional clusters: evidence from Italy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 87-103, January.
    15. Zhang, Yi & Chen, Kaihua, 2022. "Network growth dynamics: The simultaneous interaction between network positions and research performance of collaborative organisations," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Zhao, Shuliang & Wang, Junchen & Ji, Jiaojiao & Vincent Ekow, Arkorful, 2024. "Proximity or alienation? Can knowledge type influence the relationship between proximity and enterprise innovation performance?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    17. Maria Tsouri, 2022. "Knowledge networks and strong tie creation: the role of relative network position," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 95-114, January.
    18. Wentian Shi & Wenlong Yang & Debin Du, 2020. "The Scientific Cooperation Network of Chinese Scientists and Its Proximity Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Yawen Qin & Xiaozhen Qin & Haohui Chen & Xun Li & Wei Lang, 2021. "Measuring cognitive proximity using semantic analysis: A case study of China's ICT industry," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6059-6084, July.
    20. Min Guo & Naiding Yang & Jingbei Wang & Yanlu Zhang, 2021. "Multi-dimensional proximity and network stability: the moderating role of network cohesion," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3471-3499, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:148:y:2025:i:c:s0166497225001774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.