IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v52y2018i1p23-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: towards an integrated framework

Author

Listed:
  • Mila Davids
  • Koen Frenken

Abstract

Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: towards an integrated framework. Regional Studies. The proximity concept refers to types of inter-organizational relationships that are expected to facilitate interactive learning and collaborative innovation. Different forms of proximity include geographical, cognitive, social, institutional and organizational proximity. This paper argues that the relative importance of each proximity dimension depends on the type of knowledge being produced. It distinguishes between analytical, synthetic and symbolic knowledge, the intensity of which in turn varies with research, development and marketing stages of new product development. The case study of Unilever’s Becel diet margarine serves as a first example of such an integrated framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Mila Davids & Koen Frenken, 2018. "Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: towards an integrated framework," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 23-34, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:52:y:2018:i:1:p:23-34
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1287349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00343404.2017.1287349
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343404.2017.1287349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jones, Geoffrey, 2005. "Renewing Unilever: Transformation and Tradition," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199269433, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie Decker & Matthias Kipping & R. Daniel Wadhwani, 2015. "New business histories! Plurality in business history research methods," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 30-40, January.
    2. Davids, Mila & Frenken, Koen, 2015. "Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process The case of Unilever’s Becel diet margarine," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    3. Qing Lu, 2014. "Is the speed of post-acquisition integration manageable? Case study: post-acquisition integration of HSBC with the Mercantile Bank, 1959-84," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(8), pages 1262-1280, November.
    4. Jacqueline Mees-Buss & Catherine Welch & D. Eleanor Westney, 2019. "What happened to the transnational? The emergence of the neo-global corporation," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1513-1543, December.
    5. Teresa da Silva Lopes & Mark Casson & Geoffrey Jones, 2019. "Organizational innovation in the multinational enterprise: Internalization theory and business history," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(8), pages 1338-1358, October.
    6. Andrew David Allan Smith, 2014. "A successful British MNE in the backyard of American big business: Explaining the performance of the American and Canadian subsidiaries of Lever Brothers 1888-1914," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 135-160, March.
    7. Aldous, Michael & Conroy, Kieran M., 2021. "Navigating institutional change: An historical perspective of firm responses to pro-market reversals," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(2).
    8. Anirvan Pant & J Ramachandran, 2017. "Navigating identity duality in multinational subsidiaries: A paradox lens on identity claims at Hindustan Unilever 1959–2015," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(6), pages 664-692, August.
    9. Stefan Schwarzkopf, 2008. "Turning Trade Marks into Brands: how Advertising Agencies Created Brands in the Global Market Place, 1900-1930," Working Papers 18, Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research.
    10. Ryo Izawa, 2018. "Corporate Structural Change for Tax Avoidance: British Multinational Enterprises and International Double Taxation between the First and Second World Wars," Discussion Papers CRR Discussion Paper Series A: General 33, Shiga University, Faculty of Economics,Center for Risk Research.
    11. Mark Billings & Anna Tilba & John Wilson, 2016. "‘To invite disappointment or worse’: governance, audit and due diligence in the Ferranti–ISC merger," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 453-478, May.
    12. Rory M. Miller, 2013. "Financing British manufacturing multinationals in Latin America, 1930-65," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 818-839, July.
    13. Geoffrey G. Jones & Christina Lubinski, 2013. "Historical Origins of Environment Sustainability in the German Chemical Industry, 1950s-1980s," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-018, Harvard Business School.
    14. Kees Van Veen & Janine Elbertsen, 2008. "Governance Regimes and Nationality Diversity in Corporate Boards: A Comparative Study of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 386-399, September.
    15. Geoffrey Jones, 2008. "Blonde and blue‐eyed? Globalizing beauty, c.1945–c.19801," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 61(1), pages 125-154, February.
    16. Geoffrey Jones & Peter Miskell, 2005. "European integration and corporate restructuring: the strategy of Unilever, c.1957–c.1990," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 58(1), pages 113-139, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:52:y:2018:i:1:p:23-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.