IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v143y2025ics0166497225000537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dark side of green subsidies: Do green subsidies to a focal firm crowd out peers’ green innovation?

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, Xuemei
  • Wang, Mengge

Abstract

Many studies have shown that green subsidies can promote green innovation in recipient firms, but the impact of green subsidies to a focal firm on peer firms' green innovation remains understudied. To fill in this research gap, the current study uses data from 2,155 listed Chinese manufacturing firms and a multi-period difference-in differences approach to examine the impact of green subsidies to a focal firm on peer firms' green innovation. We find that such subsidies negatively affect peer firms' green innovation. Thereafter, we use the attention-based view to examine the role of regulatory focus (promotion and prevention focus) in the relationship between green subsidies and peer green innovation. We find that peer firms' promotion focus weakens the negative effect of green subsidies to a focal firm on peer green innovation, whereas peer firms' prevention focus aggravates this effect. Moreover, we examine the competitive mechanism through which green subsidies to a focal firm crowd out peer green innovation, finding that the crowding-out effect is more pronounced in peer firms with higher market concentration and greater product market share. We likewise investigate the heterogeneous effects of firm, industry, and regional characteristics on the relationship between green subsidies and peer green innovation. Results indicate that green subsidies to state-owned firms, mature firms, high-tech firms, and firms located in pilot low-carbon cities have considerably strong negative effects on peer green innovation. Our study challenges the prevailing view of environmental regulations' positive spillover effects on peer green innovation by highlighting green subsidies' “dark side.” We reveal the crowding-out effect of green subsidies to focal firms on peer green innovation, stimulating scholarly debate on their effectiveness and providing important implications for environmental policies’ enactment.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, Xuemei & Wang, Mengge, 2025. "Dark side of green subsidies: Do green subsidies to a focal firm crowd out peers’ green innovation?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:143:y:2025:i:c:s0166497225000537
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000537
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:143:y:2025:i:c:s0166497225000537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.