IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v31y2022i5p1905-1918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking stakeholder and competitive pressure to Industry 4.0 and performance: Mediating effect of environmental commitment and green process innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Manjot Singh Bhatia
  • Saurabh Kumar

Abstract

In the recent few years, with an increase in focus on sustainability, firms have been actively pursuing different strategies to contribute towards sustainability. Industry 4.0 (I4) technologies can help organizations to achieve superior environmental as well as economic performance. Through the lens of stakeholder theory (ST) and Schumpeterian view of competition (SCV), this paper examines whether stakeholder and competitive pressures towards sustainability stimulate organizations to implement I4 technologies and commensurate performance outcomes. The study further tests the mediating role of environmental commitment and green process innovation (GPI) on these relationships. The proposed hypotheses are examined using the survey data from 173 manufacturing firms in India by partial least squares (PLS) approach. Findings show that environmental commitment mediates the effect of stakeholder and competitive pressures on I4 technologies. Further, results also show that GPI mediates between I4 technologies and performance. The findings provide insights for managers on how they can best respond to stakeholder and competitive pressures on sustainability and contribute towards sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Manjot Singh Bhatia & Saurabh Kumar, 2022. "Linking stakeholder and competitive pressure to Industry 4.0 and performance: Mediating effect of environmental commitment and green process innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1905-1918, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:5:p:1905-1918
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.2989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2989
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.2989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Supply Chain Risk Management," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Managing Supply Chain Risk, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 3-11, Springer.
    2. Marie‐Josée Roy & Olivier Boiral & Denis Lagacé, 2001. "Environmental commitment and manufacturing excellence: a comparative study within Canadian industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(5), pages 257-268, September.
    3. Jing-Wen Huang & Yong-Hui Li, 2017. "Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 309-324, October.
    4. Sreedevi, R. & Saranga, Haritha, 2017. "Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 332-342.
    5. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    6. Kumar, Gopal & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Maria Arputham, Ramkumar, 2018. "Missing link between sustainability collaborative strategy and supply chain performance: Role of dynamic capability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 96-109.
    7. Chee Yew Wong & Christina W.Y. Wong & Sakun Boon-itt, 2020. "Effects of green supply chain integration and green innovation on environmental and cost performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(15), pages 4589-4609, July.
    8. Paolo Rosa & Claudio Sassanelli & Andrea Urbinati & Davide Chiaroni & Sergio Terzi, 2020. "Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(6), pages 1662-1687, March.
    9. Markus Lang & Patricia Deflorin & Helmut Dietl & Eric Lucas, 2014. "The Impact of Complexity on Knowledge Transfer in Manufacturing Networks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(11), pages 1886-1898, November.
    10. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Researchers’ Perspectives on Supply-Chain Risk Research," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Managing Supply Chain Risk, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 281-301, Springer.
    11. Wantao Yu & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan, 2015. "An empirical examination of stakeholder pressures, green operations practices and environmental performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(21), pages 6390-6407, November.
    12. Shanyong Wang & Jun Li & Dingtao Zhao, 2018. "Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Practices: The Moderating Effects of Environmental Commitment and Resource Availability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 52-69, January.
    13. Liang Guo & Tian Li & Hongtao Zhang, 2014. "Strategic Information Sharing in Competing Channels," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(10), pages 1719-1731, October.
    14. Barbieri, Nicolò & Marzucchi, Alberto & Rizzo, Ugo, 2020. "Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(2).
    15. Dai, Jing & Montabon, Frank L. & Cantor, David E., 2014. "Linking rival and stakeholder pressure to green supply management: Mediating role of top management support," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 173-187.
    16. Carla Gonçalves Machado & Mats Peter Winroth & Elias Hans Dener Ribeiro da Silva, 2020. "Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0: an emerging research agenda," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(5), pages 1462-1484, March.
    17. Nicole Darnall & Irene Henriques & Perry Sadorsky, 2010. "Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1072-1094, September.
    18. Chiou, Tzu-Yun & Chan, Hing Kai & Lettice, Fiona & Chung, Sai Ho, 2011. "The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 822-836.
    19. Jinxia Jiao & ChenGuang Liu & Yan Xu, 2020. "Effects of stakeholder pressure, managerial perceptions, and resource availability on sustainable operations adoption," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3246-3260, December.
    20. Ye, Fei & Zhao, Xiande & Prahinski, Carol & Li, Yina, 2013. "The impact of institutional pressures, top managers' posture and reverse logistics on performance—Evidence from China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 132-143.
    21. Alan Muller & Ans Kolk, 2010. "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Drivers of Corporate Social Performance: Evidence from Foreign and Domestic Firms in Mexico," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 1-26, January.
    22. Magali A. Delmas & Michael W. Toffel, 2008. "Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(10), pages 1027-1055, October.
    23. Dai, Jing & Cantor, David E. & Montabon, Frank L., 2017. "Examining corporate environmental proactivity and operational performance: A strategy-structure-capabilities-performance perspective within a green context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 272-280.
    24. Dalenogare, Lucas Santos & Benitez, Guilherme Brittes & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Frank, Alejandro Germán, 2018. "The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 383-394.
    25. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    26. Yang Chen & Guiyao Tang & Jiafei Jin & Ji Li & Pascal Paillé, 2015. "Linking Market Orientation and Environmental Performance: The Influence of Environmental Strategy, Employee’s Environmental Involvement, and Environmental Product Quality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 479-500, March.
    27. Ying Luo & Xiaowen Jie & Xiaoping Li, 2020. "The organic joint point of new kinetic energy and green development in Chinese manufacturing SMEs," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(23), pages 7269-7291, December.
    28. Ying-Ju Chen & Mingcherng Deng, 2015. "Information Sharing in a Manufacturer–Supplier Relationship: Suppliers' Incentive and Production Efficiency," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(4), pages 619-633, April.
    29. Sarkis, Joseph & Zhu, Qinghua & Lai, Kee-hung, 2011. "An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-15, March.
    30. Yu-Shan Chen & Shyh-Bao Lai & Chao-Tung Wen, 2006. "The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 331-339, September.
    31. Yadlapalli, Aswini & Rahman, Shams & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2018. "Socially responsible governance mechanisms for manufacturing firms in apparel supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 135-149.
    32. Tenenhaus, Michel & Vinzi, Vincenzo Esposito & Chatelin, Yves-Marie & Lauro, Carlo, 2005. "PLS path modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 159-205, January.
    33. Johan Jansson & Jonas Nilsson & Frida Modig & Gabriella Hed Vall, 2017. "Commitment to Sustainability in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: The Influence of Strategic Orientations and Management Values," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 69-83, January.
    34. Ching-Hsun Chang, 2011. "The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 361-370, December.
    35. Kiel, Daniel & Arnold, Christian & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2017. "The influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on business models of established manufacturing companies – A business level perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 4-19.
    36. Wang, Yuan & Modi, Sachin B. & Schoenherr, Tobias, 2021. "Leveraging sustainable design practices through supplier involvement in new product development: The role of the suppliers' environmental management capability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    37. Qinghua Zhu & Yong Geng & Kee‐hung Lai, 2011. "Environmental Supply Chain Cooperation and Its Effect on the Circular Economy Practice‐Performance Relationship Among Chinese Manufacturers," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(3), pages 405-419, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cannavacciuolo, Lorella & Ferraro, Giovanna & Ponsiglione, Cristina & Primario, Simonetta & Quinto, Ivana, 2023. "Technological innovation-enabling industry 4.0 paradigm: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Han, Myat Su & Ma, Shuang (Sara) & Wang, Yonggui & Tian, Qinghong, 2023. "Impact of technology-enabled product eco-innovation: Empirical evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manjot Singh Bhatia, 2021. "Green process innovation and operational performance: The role of proactive environment strategy, technological capabilities, and organizational learning," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2845-2857, November.
    2. Ardian Qorri & Saranda Gashi & Andrzej Kraslawski, 2021. "Performance outcomes of supply chain practices for sustainable development: A meta‐analysis of moderators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 194-216, January.
    3. Manjot Singh Bhatia & Suresh Kumar Jakhar, 2021. "The effect of environmental regulations, top management commitment, and organizational learning on green product innovation: Evidence from automobile industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3907-3918, December.
    4. Xinwei Li & Wenjuan Zeng & Mao Xu, 2022. "The Moderating Role of IT Capability on Green Innovation and Ambidexterity: Towards a Corporate Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Huang, Yi-Chun & Chen, Chih Ta, 2022. "Exploring institutional pressures, firm green slack, green product innovation and green new product success: Evidence from Taiwan's high-tech industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Oksana Seroka‐Stolka, 2023. "Towards sustainability: An environmental strategy choice, environmental performance, and the moderating role of stakeholder pressure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5992-6007, December.
    7. Yu, Yubing & Zhang, Justin Zuopeng & Cao, Yanhong & Kazancoglu, Yigit, 2021. "Intelligent transformation of the manufacturing industry for Industry 4.0: Seizing financial benefits from supply chain relationship capital through enterprise green management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Ammar Masood & Mohsin Altaf & Mohsin Raza Khan & Tanveer Illahi & Abdul Qayyum, 2021. "Industrial Environmental Performance: Mapping And Systematic Literature Review," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(4), pages 76-100, December.
    9. Asif Khan & Chih-Cheng Chen & Kwanrat Suanpong & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Santhaya Kittikowit & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Second-Order Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Ahmad Jusoh & Habib Zare, 2017. "Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Solve Environmental Sustainability Problems: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-65, October.
    11. Samuel Adomako, 2020. "Environmental collaboration, sustainable innovation, and small and medium‐sized enterprise growth in sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence from Ghana," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1609-1619, November.
    12. Chao Hung Wang, 2020. "An environmental perspective extends market orientation: Green innovation sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3123-3134, December.
    13. Ayça Kubra Hizarci‐Payne & İlayda İpek & Gülüzar Kurt Gümüş, 2021. "How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta‐analytic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1174-1190, February.
    14. Kazancoglu, Yigit & Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz & Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kumar, Ajay, 2021. "Industry 4.0 impacts on responsible environmental and societal management in the family business," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Gema Albort-Morant & Antonio Leal-Millán & Gabriel Cepeda-Carrion & Jörg Henseler, 2018. "Developing green innovation performance by fostering of organizational knowledge and coopetitive relations," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 499-517, March.
    16. M. K. Dhillon & P. M. Rafi-Ul-Shan & H. Amar & F. Sher & S. Ahmed, 2023. "Flexible Green Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies: A Systematic Literature Review," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Norifumi Kawai & Roger Strange & Antonella Zucchella, 2016. "Stakeholder Pressures, EMS Implementation, and Green Innovation in MNC Overseas Subsidiaries," DEM Working Papers Series 121, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    18. Defeng Yang & Aric Xu Wang & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Wei Jiang, 2019. "Environmental Strategy, Institutional Force, and Innovation Capability: A Managerial Cognition Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1147-1161, November.
    19. Xie, Xuemei & Han, Yuhang & Hoang, Thu Thao, 2022. "Can green process innovation improve both financial and environmental performance? The roles of TMT heterogeneity and ownership," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    20. Jongjin Sohn & Jongseon Lee & Nami Kim, 2020. "Going Green Inside and Out: Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Financial Performance under Regulatory Stringency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:5:p:1905-1918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.