IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v18y2025i1d10.1007_s12063-025-00545-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a maturity model for Industry 4.0 practices in manufacturing SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Anbesh Jamwal

    (Jaipuria Institute of Management)

  • Rajeev Agrawal

    (Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur)

  • Monica Sharma

    (Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur)

Abstract

Disruptive technologies like IoT, cyber-physical systems, blockchain, additive manufacturing, simulation, and robotics are transforming traditional factories into smart factories, considered an ‘Industry 4.0’ revolution. Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies positively impact the organizations at different level of sustainability. Organizations must understand I4.0 technologies and be prepared to adopt physical and digital technologies to make appropriate decisions to improve their market competitiveness. In this regard, I4.0 readiness and maturity models can support organizations to assess their current maturity status and set up a roadmap for further actions for digital transformation. Integrating sustainability principles with I4.0 can enable socially responsible and environmentally conscious manufacturing in organizations. Also, leveraging I4.0 technologies can optimize resource consumption and reduce waste, which helps manufacturing organizations to achieve market competitiveness and sustainable innovation. In the literature, most of maturity models are developed for or by large enterprises with limited applicability in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Also, maturity items considered in these models are not empirically validated. To fill this research gap, this study proposes a maturity model for SMEs, which is empirically tested in Indian manufacturing organizations and includes 40 maturity items in eight major dimensions that impact sustainability and can help to transform the manufacturing sector towards more resource-efficient and sustainable. A large survey is conducted in the Indian manufacturing organizations to validate these maturity items in the Indian context. Then, a model based on Exploratory factor analysis is proposed in 8 dimensions. The proposed model is validated in four case organizations from pharmaceutical and automobile sectors. The results indicated that base technologies and legal maturity items have higher maturity scores. Based on the study’s findings, implications for practitioners and policymakers are provided to improve maturity levels in manufacturing organizations. The study’s contribution is important and unique for manufacturing organizations as validation of maturity items and maturity model for SMEs with sustainability benefits is non-existent.

Suggested Citation

  • Anbesh Jamwal & Rajeev Agrawal & Monica Sharma, 2025. "Developing a maturity model for Industry 4.0 practices in manufacturing SMEs," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 111-143, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-025-00545-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-025-00545-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-025-00545-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-025-00545-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Ting & Ardolino, Marco & Bacchetti, Andrea & Perona, Marco, 2021. "The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: a systematic literature review," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 129469, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Raj, Alok & Dwivedi, Gourav & Sharma, Ankit & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Rajak, Sonu, 2020. "Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    3. Elisabete Correia & Helena Carvalho & Susana G. Azevedo & Kannan Govindan, 2017. "Maturity Models in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, January.
    4. Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe & Gavião, Luiz Octávio & Ivson, Paulo & Nascimento, Daniel Luiz de Mattos & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo, 2021. "A fuzzy rule-based industry 4.0 maturity model for operations and supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Govindan, Kannan & Kaliyan, Mathiyazhagan & Kannan, Devika & Haq, A.N., 2014. "Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 555-568.
    6. Judit Oláh & Nemer Aburumman & József Popp & Muhammad Asif Khan & Hossam Haddad & Nicodemus Kitukutha, 2020. "Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Slavko Rakic & Marko Pavlovic & Ugljesa Marjanovic, 2021. "A Precondition of Sustainability: Industry 4.0 Readiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Frederik Marx & Felix Wortmann & Jörg Mayer, 2012. "A Maturity Model for Management Control Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(4), pages 193-207, August.
    9. Kumar, Abhishek & Sah, Bikash & Singh, Arvind R. & Deng, Yan & He, Xiangning & Kumar, Praveen & Bansal, R.C., 2017. "A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 596-609.
    10. Neeraj Singhal, 2021. "An Empirical Investigation of Industry 4.0 Preparedness in India," Vision, , vol. 25(3), pages 300-311, September.
    11. Chiara Cimini & Alexandra Lagorio & Paolo Gaiardelli, 2023. "The evolution of operators’ role in production: how Lean Manufacturing and Industry 4.0 affect Job Enlargement and Job Enrichment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(24), pages 8493-8511, December.
    12. Manjot Singh Bhatia & Saurabh Kumar, 2022. "Linking stakeholder and competitive pressure to Industry 4.0 and performance: Mediating effect of environmental commitment and green process innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1905-1918, July.
    13. Ting Zheng & Marco Ardolino & Andrea Bacchetti & Marco Perona, 2021. "The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(6), pages 1922-1954, March.
    14. Dalenogare, Lucas Santos & Benitez, Guilherme Brittes & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Frank, Alejandro Germán, 2018. "The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 383-394.
    15. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ganesh Narkhede & Vishwas Dohale & Yash Mahajan, 2024. "Darker side of industry 4.0 and its impact on triple‐bottom‐line sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 5999-6016, December.
    2. Alok Raj & Anand Jeyaraj, 2023. "Antecedents and consequents of industry 4.0 adoption using technology, organization and environment (TOE) framework: A meta-analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 101-124, March.
    3. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2022. "Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    4. Andrew Wear, 2023. "Emergent concepts in local economic development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(8), pages 804-826, December.
    5. Saraswat, Jeetendra Kumar & Choudhari, Sanjay, 2025. "Integrating big data and cloud computing into the existing system and performance impact: A case study in manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    6. Biman Darshana Hettiarachchi & Stefan Seuring & Marcus Brandenburg, 2022. "Industry 4.0-driven operations and supply chains for the circular economy: a bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 858-878, December.
    7. Bettiol, Marco & Capestro, Mauro & Di Maria, Eleonora & Ganau, Roberto, 2024. "Is this time different?: how Industry 4.0 affects firms' labor productivity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124545, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Liu, Yanping & Farooque, Muhammad & Lee, Chang-Hun & Gong, Yu & Zhang, Abraham, 2023. "Antecedents of circular manufacturing and its effect on environmental and financial performance: A practice-based view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    9. Somohano-Rodríguez, Francisco M. & Madrid-Guijarro, Antonia, 2022. "Do industry 4.0 technologies improve Cantabrian manufacturing smes performance? The role played by industry competition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Marco Bettiol & Mauro Capestro & Eleonora Di Maria & Roberto Ganau, 2024. "Is this time different? How Industry 4.0 affects firms’ labor productivity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1449-1467, April.
    11. Matt, Dominik T. & Pedrini, Giulio & Bonfanti, Angelo & Orzes, Guido, 2023. "Industrial digitalization. A systematic literature review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 47-78.
    12. Srikant Gupta & Rajesh Kumar Singh & Chintan Amrit, 2025. "Integrating Industry 4.0 with Circular Economy Approach for Sustainable and Flexible Manufacturing Systems," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(1), pages 115-145, March.
    13. Grybauskas, Andrius & Stefanini, Alessandro & Ghobakhloo, Morteza, 2022. "Social sustainability in the age of digitalization: A systematic literature Review on the social implications of industry 4.0," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Gastaldi, Luca & Lessanibahri, Sina & Tedaldi, Gianluca & Miragliotta, Giovanni, 2022. "Companies’ adoption of Smart Technologies to achieve structural ambidexterity: an analysis with SEM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    15. Battaglia, Daniele & Galati, Francesco & Molinaro, Margherita & Pessot, Elena, 2023. "Full, hybrid and platform complementarity: Exploring the industry 4.0 technology-performance link," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    16. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    17. Ghannouchi, Imen, 2023. "Examining the dynamic nexus between industry 4.0 technologies and sustainable economy: New insights from empirical evidence using GMM estimator across 20 OECD nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Juhás Martin & Juhásová Bohuslava & Nemlaha Eduard & Charvát Dominik, 2021. "Increasing the Efficiency of a Robotic Cell Using Simulation," Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, Sciendo, vol. 29(49), pages 24-35, September.
    19. Lixin Shen & Kannan Govindan & Madan Shankar, 2015. "Evaluation of Barriers of Corporate Social Responsibility Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process under a Fuzzy Environment—A Textile Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre & Sokolov, Boris, 2022. "Cloud supply chain: Integrating Industry 4.0 and digital platforms in the “Supply Chain-as-a-Service”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-025-00545-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.