IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v35y2024i5d10.1007_s10845-023-02098-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Active learning and novel model calibration measurements for automated visual inspection in manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Jože M. Rožanec

    (Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School
    Jožef Stefan Institute
    Qlector d.o.o.)

  • Luka Bizjak

    (Jožef Stefan Institute)

  • Elena Trajkova

    (University of Ljubljana)

  • Patrik Zajec

    (Jožef Stefan Institute)

  • Jelle Keizer

    (Philips Consumer Lifestyle BV)

  • Blaž Fortuna

    (Qlector d.o.o.)

  • Dunja Mladenić

    (Jožef Stefan Institute)

Abstract

Quality control is a crucial activity performed by manufacturing enterprises to ensure that their products meet quality standards and avoid potential damage to the brand’s reputation. The decreased cost of sensors and connectivity enabled increasing digitalization of manufacturing. In addition, artificial intelligence enables higher degrees of automation, reducing overall costs and time required for defect inspection. This research compares three active learning approaches, having single and multiple oracles, to visual inspection. Six new metrics are proposed to assess the quality of calibration without the need for ground truth. Furthermore, this research explores whether existing calibrators can improve performance by leveraging an approximate ground truth to enlarge the calibration set. The experiments were performed on real-world data provided by Philips Consumer Lifestyle BV. Our results show that the explored active learning settings can reduce the data labeling effort by between three and four percent without detriment to the overall quality goals, considering a threshold of p = 0.95. Furthermore, the results show that the proposed calibration metrics successfully capture relevant information otherwise available to metrics used up to date only through ground truth data. Therefore, the proposed metrics can be used to estimate the quality of models’ probability calibration without committing to a labeling effort to obtain ground truth data.

Suggested Citation

  • Jože M. Rožanec & Luka Bizjak & Elena Trajkova & Patrik Zajec & Jelle Keizer & Blaž Fortuna & Dunja Mladenić, 2024. "Active learning and novel model calibration measurements for automated visual inspection in manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 1963-1984, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:35:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02098-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-023-02098-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-023-02098-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-023-02098-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sholom M. Weiss & Amit Dhurandhar & Robert J. Baseman & Brian F. White & Ronald Logan & Jonathan K. Winslow & Daniel Poindexter, 2016. "Continuous prediction of manufacturing performance throughout the production lifecycle," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 751-763, August.
    2. Ting Zheng & Marco Ardolino & Andrea Bacchetti & Marco Perona, 2021. "The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(6), pages 1922-1954, March.
    3. Ahmad Barari & Marcos Sales Guerra Tsuzuki & Yuval Cohen & Marco Macchi, 2021. "Editorial: intelligent manufacturing systems towards industry 4.0 era," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1793-1796, October.
    4. Zheng, Ting & Ardolino, Marco & Bacchetti, Andrea & Perona, Marco, 2021. "The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: a systematic literature review," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 129469, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Hui Lin & Bin Li & Xinggang Wang & Yufeng Shu & Shuanglong Niu, 2019. "Automated defect inspection of LED chip using deep convolutional neural network," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 2525-2534, August.
    6. Masoumeh Aminzadeh & Thomas R. Kurfess, 2019. "Online quality inspection using Bayesian classification in powder-bed additive manufacturing from high-resolution visual camera images," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 2505-2523, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juhás Martin & Juhásová Bohuslava & Nemlaha Eduard & Charvát Dominik, 2021. "Increasing the Efficiency of a Robotic Cell Using Simulation," Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, Sciendo, vol. 29(49), pages 24-35, September.
    2. Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre & Sokolov, Boris, 2022. "Cloud supply chain: Integrating Industry 4.0 and digital platforms in the “Supply Chain-as-a-Service”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Mahdi Mokhtarzadeh & Jorge Rodríguez-Echeverría & Ivana Semanjski & Sidharta Gautama, 2025. "Hybrid intelligence failure analysis for industry 4.0: a literature review and future prospective," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2309-2334, April.
    4. Moazzeni, Sahar & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2025. "Collaborative logistics and digital technologies in rural contexts: a systematic review and a decision aid model for logistics decision-makers," Discussion Papers 2025/12, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    5. Ibrahim Yousif & Liam Burns & Fadi El Kalach & Ramy Harik, 2025. "Leveraging computer vision towards high-efficiency autonomous industrial facilities," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 2983-3008, June.
    6. Luo, Shiyue & Yu, Mengyao & Dong, Yilan & Hao, Yu & Li, Changping & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "Toward urban high-quality development: Evidence from more intelligent Chinese cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    7. Biman Darshana Hettiarachchi & Stefan Seuring & Marcus Brandenburg, 2022. "Industry 4.0-driven operations and supply chains for the circular economy: a bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 858-878, December.
    8. Haodong Chen & Niloofar Zendehdel & Ming C. Leu & Zhaozheng Yin, 2024. "Fine-grained activity classification in assembly based on multi-visual modalities," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 2215-2233, June.
    9. Bettiol, Marco & Capestro, Mauro & Di Maria, Eleonora & Ganau, Roberto, 2024. "Is this time different?: how Industry 4.0 affects firms' labor productivity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124545, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Piccarozzi, Michela & Silvestri, Luca & Silvestri, Cecilia & Ruggieri, Alessandro, 2024. "Roadmap to Industry 5.0: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities towards a holistic definition in management studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Alok Raj & Anand Jeyaraj, 2023. "Antecedents and consequents of industry 4.0 adoption using technology, organization and environment (TOE) framework: A meta-analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 101-124, March.
    12. Somohano-Rodríguez, Francisco M. & Madrid-Guijarro, Antonia, 2022. "Do industry 4.0 technologies improve Cantabrian manufacturing smes performance? The role played by industry competition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Marco Bettiol & Mauro Capestro & Eleonora Di Maria & Roberto Ganau, 2024. "Is this time different? How Industry 4.0 affects firms’ labor productivity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1449-1467, April.
    14. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2022. "Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    15. Andrew Wear, 2023. "Emergent concepts in local economic development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(8), pages 804-826, December.
    16. Anbesh Jamwal & Rajeev Agrawal & Monica Sharma, 2025. "Developing a maturity model for Industry 4.0 practices in manufacturing SMEs," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 111-143, March.
    17. Saumyaranjan Sahoo & Satish Kumar & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Weng Marc Lim & J. Christopher Westland & Ashwani Kumar, 2024. "Blockchain for sustainable supply chain management: trends and ways forward," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1563-1618, September.
    18. An, Hongda & Galera-Zarco, Carlos, 2025. "Tackling food waste and loss through digitalization in the food supply chain: A systematic review and framework development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    19. Anlan Chen & Yong Lin & Marcello Mariani & Yongyi Shou & Yufeng Zhang, 2023. "Entrepreneurial growth in digital business ecosystems: an integrated framework blending the knowledge-based view of the firm and business ecosystems," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1628-1653, October.
    20. Benjamin James Ralph & Marcel Sorger & Karin Hartl & Andreas Schwarz-Gsaxner & Florian Messner & Martin Stockinger, 2022. "Transformation of a rolling mill aggregate to a cyber physical production system: from sensor retrofitting to machine learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 493-518, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:35:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02098-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.