IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i1p64-d87043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maturity Models in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabete Correia

    (ISCAC—Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, Coimbra 3040-316, Portugal)

  • Helena Carvalho

    (UNIDEMI, Faculty of Science and Technology, FCT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

  • Susana G. Azevedo

    (CEFAGE-UBI, UNIDEMI, Department of Business and Economics, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Kannan Govindan

    (Center for Engineering Operations Management, Department of Technology and Innovation, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M-5230, Denmark
    Authorship listing follows a reverse seniority order.)

Abstract

A systematic literature review of supply chain maturity models with sustainability concerns is presented. The objective is to give insights into methodological issues related to maturity models, namely the research objectives; the research methods used to develop, validate and test them; the scope; and the main characteristics associated with their design. The literature review was performed based on journal articles and conference papers from 2000 to 2015 using the SCOPUS, Emerald Insight, EBSCO and Web of Science databases. Most of the analysed papers have as main objective the development of maturity models and their validation. The case study is the methodology that is most widely used by researchers to develop and validate maturity models. From the sustainability perspective, the scope of the analysed maturity models is the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) and environmental dimension, focusing on a specific process (eco-design and new product development) and without a broad SC perspective. The dominant characteristics associated with the design of the maturity models are the maturity grids and a continuous representation. In addition, results do not allow identifying a trend for a specific number of maturity levels. The comprehensive review, analysis, and synthesis of the maturity model literature represent an important contribution to the organization of this research area, making possible to clarify some confusion that exists about concepts, approaches and components of maturity models in sustainability. Various aspects associated with the maturity models (i.e., research objectives, research methods, scope and characteristics of the design of models) are explored to contribute to the evolution and significance of this multidimensional area.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabete Correia & Helena Carvalho & Susana G. Azevedo & Kannan Govindan, 2017. "Maturity Models in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:64-:d:87043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/64/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/64/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rick Edgeman & Jacob Eskildsen, 2014. "Modeling and Assessing Sustainable Enterprise Excellence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 173-187, March.
    2. Beske, Philip & Land, Anna & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 131-143.
    3. Tobias Mettler, 2010. "Thinking in Terms of Design Decisions When Developing Maturity Models," International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), IGI Global, vol. 1(4), pages 76-87, October.
    4. Uche Okongwu & Risako Morimoto & Matthieu Lauras, 2013. "The maturity of supply chain sustainability disclosure from a continuous improvement perspective," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 62(8), pages 827-855, October.
    5. Govindan, Kannan & Palaniappan, Murugesan & Zhu, Qinghua & Kannan, Devika, 2012. "Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 204-211.
    6. Cristina Gimenez & Vicenta Sierra, 2013. "Sustainable Supply Chains: Governance Mechanisms to Greening Suppliers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 189-203, August.
    7. Umit S. Bititci & Patrizia Garengo & Aylin Ates & Sai S. Nudurupati, 2015. "Value of maturity models in performance measurement," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(10), pages 3062-3085, May.
    8. Rupert J. Baumgartner & Daniela Ebner, 2010. "Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(2), pages 76-89.
    9. Flavio Tonelli & Steve Evans & Paolo Taticchi, 2013. "Industrial sustainability: challenges, perspectives, actions," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 143-163.
    10. Susana Garrido Azevedo & Helena Carvalho & Luís M. Ferreira & João C. O. Matias, 2017. "A proposed framework to assess upstream supply chain sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 2253-2273, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davidson de Almeida Santos & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes & Luis Perez Zotes & Sérgio Luiz Braga França & Guilherme Vinagre Pinto de Souza & Robson Amarante de Araújo, 2020. "Proposal for a Maturity Model in Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-37, November.
    2. Ekaterina Yatskovskaya & Jagjit Singh Srai & Mukesh Kumar, 2018. "Integrated Supply Network Maturity Model: Water Scarcity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Albachiara Boffelli & Stefano Dotti & Paolo Gaiardelli & Giorgia Carissimi & Barbara Resta, 2019. "Corporate Environmental Management for the Textile Industry: Toward an Empirical Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Geyi, Dan’Asabe Godwin & Yusuf, Yahaya & Menhat, Masha S. & Abubakar, Tijjani & Ogbuke, Nnamdi J., 2020. "Agile capabilities as necessary conditions for maximising sustainable supply chain performance: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Ardian Qorri & Saranda Gashi & Andrzej Kraslawski, 2021. "Performance outcomes of supply chain practices for sustainable development: A meta‐analysis of moderators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 194-216, January.
    6. Nisha Paul Kulangara & Markus Biehl & Edmund L. Prater, 2022. "Environmentally sustainable development initiatives in upstream strategic outsourcing relationships: Examining the role of innovative capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3014-3027, November.
    7. Maria Jell‐Ojobor & Aveed Raha, 2022. "Being good at being good—The mediating role of an environmental management system in value‐creating green supply chain management practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1964-1984, July.
    8. Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Luthra, Sunil & Rich, Nick & Kumar, Divesh & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Enablers to implement sustainable initiatives in agri-food supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 379-393.
    9. Kumar, Gopal & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Maria Arputham, Ramkumar, 2018. "Missing link between sustainability collaborative strategy and supply chain performance: Role of dynamic capability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 96-109.
    10. André Tchokogué & Jean Nollet & Nathalie Merminod & Gilles Paché & Véronique Goupil, 2018. "Is Supply's Actual Contribution to Sustainable Development Strategic and Operational?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 336-358, March.
    11. Cagatay Tasdemir & Rado Gazo, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review for Better Understanding of Lean Driven Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-54, July.
    12. Radosław Wolniak, 2019. "The Level of Maturity of Quality Management Systems in Poland—Results of Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Else, Tim & Choudhary, Sonal & Genovese, Andrea, 2022. "Uncovering sustainability storylines from dairy supply chain discourse," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 858-874.
    14. Fritz, Morgane MC & Ruel, Salomée & Kallmuenzer, Andreas & Harms, Rainer, 2021. "Sustainability management in supply chains: the role of familiness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Anirudh Venkatarman & A. Dunstan Rajkumar, 2024. "Cross-Sectioning Sustainable Supply Chain Governance: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 34-46, May.
    16. Paulina Golinska-Dawson & Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Monika Kosacka-Olejnik, 2021. "Responsible Resource Management in Remanufacturing—Framework for Qualitative Assessment in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Irani, Zahir & Choy, King-Lun & Filippi, Lionel & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2015. "Performance measures and metrics in outsourcing decisions: A review for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 153-166.
    18. Carlson, Laura A. & Bitsch, Vera, 2018. "Social sustainability in the ready-made-garment sector in Bangladesh: an institutional approach to supply chains," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(2), March.
    19. Jing Wang & Yuchen Zhang & Mark Goh, 2018. "Moderating the Role of Firm Size in Sustainable Performance Improvement through Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Davis-Sramek, Beth & Robinson, Jessica L. & Darby, Jessica L. & Thomas, Rodney W., 2020. "Exploring the differential roles of environmental and social sustainability in carrier selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:64-:d:87043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.