IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i15p4239-d255044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Level of Maturity of Quality Management Systems in Poland—Results of Empirical Research

Author

Listed:
  • Radosław Wolniak

    (Organization and Management Department, Economics and Informatic Department, Silesian Technical University, Akademicka 2A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

This paper examines the problem of measuring the maturity of quality management systems. The main scope of the study is to measure the level of maturity of quality management systems in organizations with an implemented quality management system compliant with the requirements of ISO 9001 in Poland; however, this paper also investigates which factors influence the level of maturity. An analysis of the maturity level of the quality management system in the surveyed organizations showed that the highest level of maturity occurs in those areas and activities that directly result from the requirements of the ISO 9001 standard and direct market pressure, and this level of maturity must be implemented. This can be included in case areas such as customer orientation, process approach, or evidence-based decision-making. However, a lower level of maturity is observed in the case of “soft” aspects of quality management related to leadership and human resource management. The problems are also related to the implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this respect, the surveyed organizations show numerous shortcomings which lead to low assessments of their level of maturity, for example, in ensuring openness and ethical behavior in contact with the public. The following hypothesis was formulated for the research objective: H1—control variables, such as the size of the organization (H1a), time of existence of the enterprise (H1b), business profile (H1c), market position (H1d), financial condition (H1e), and ratio of management to the normalization processes (H1f), affect the level of maturity of an enterprise’s quality management system.

Suggested Citation

  • Radosław Wolniak, 2019. "The Level of Maturity of Quality Management Systems in Poland—Results of Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4239-:d:255044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, 2018. "Method for Assessing the Development of Underground Hard Coal Mines on a Regional Basis: The Concept of Measurement and Research Results," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Dogui Kouakou & Olivier Boiral & Yves Gendron, 2013. "ISO auditing and the construction of trust in auditor independence," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(8), pages 1279-1305, October.
    3. Jörg Becker & Michael Rosemann & Maximilian Röglinger & Michael Muehlen, 2012. "Business Process Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(5), pages 227-228, October.
    4. Minh Hue Nguyen & Anh Chi Phan & Yoshiki Matsui, 2018. "Contribution of Quality Management Practices to Sustainability Performance of Vietnamese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31, January.
    5. Cory Searcy, 2016. "Measuring Enterprise Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 120-133, February.
    6. Ali Bastas & Kapila Liyanage, 2018. "ISO 9001 and Supply Chain Integration Principles Based Sustainable Development: A Delphi Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-35, December.
    7. Rupert J. Baumgartner & Daniela Ebner, 2010. "Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(2), pages 76-89.
    8. Marica Barbaritano & Laura Bravi & Elisabetta Savelli, 2019. "Sustainability and Quality Management in the Italian Luxury Furniture Sector: A Circular Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Rick Edgeman & Jacob Eskildsen, 2014. "Modeling and Assessing Sustainable Enterprise Excellence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 173-187, March.
    10. Katarzyna Hys, 2013. "CSR in Poland as an Important Foundation," Active Citizenship by Knowledge Management & Innovation: Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2013,, ToKnowPress.
    11. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Marian Turek, 2017. "Dependence of Total Production Costs on Production and Infrastructure Parameters in the Polish Hard Coal Mining Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Stefan Schaltegger & Marcus Wagner, 2006. "Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19.
    13. Anh Chi Phan & Ha Thu Nguyen & Hao Anh Nguyen & Yoshiki Matsui, 2019. "Effect of Total Quality Management Practices and JIT Production Practices on Flexibility Performance: Empirical Evidence from International Manufacturing Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Radosław Wolniak, 2013. "The assessment of significance of benefits gained from the improvement of quality management systems in Polish organizations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 515-528, January.
    15. Matthias S. Fifka, 2013. "Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 1-35, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radoslaw Wolniak & Marcin Olkiewicz & Marta Szymczewska & Anna Olkiewicz, 2020. "The Functioning of the Real Estate Market: Dynamics of Price Formation and the Sale of Apartments," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 281-307.
    2. José Carlos Sá & Manuel Reis & José Dinis-Carvalho & Francisco J. G. Silva & Gilberto Santos & Luis P. Ferreira & Vanda Lima, 2022. "The Development of an Excellence Model Integrating the Shingo Model and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Bożena Gajdzik, 2020. "Social Expectations and Market Changes in the Context of Developing the Industry 4.0 Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Anna Olkiewicz & Marcin Okliewicz & Radosław Wolniak & Paula Donajska, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Organization of Work in a Fish Processing Industrial Enterprise," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 502-515.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    2. Jakub Jasiński & Michał Żabiński, 2022. "Quality Management and Sustainable Development in Local Communes – Evidence from Poland," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 763-782, September.
    3. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero & María‐Antonia Garcia‐Benau, 2019. "Integrated reporting: The mediating role of the board of directors and investor protection on managerial discretion in munificent environments," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 29-45, January.
    4. Patrícia Tourais & Nuno Videira, 2024. "Sustainability transition strategies in a business context: A co‐creation process in the Portuguese hospitality sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 600-628, January.
    5. Rea Wagner & Peter Seele, 2017. "Uncommitted Deliberation? Discussing Regulatory Gaps by Comparing GRI 3.1 to GRI 4.0 in a Political CSR Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 333-351, December.
    6. Davidson de Almeida Santos & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes & Luis Perez Zotes & Sérgio Luiz Braga França & Guilherme Vinagre Pinto de Souza & Robson Amarante de Araújo, 2020. "Proposal for a Maturity Model in Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-37, November.
    7. Jay Joseph & Marc Orlitzky & Bruce Gurd & Helen Borland & Adam Lindgreen, 2019. "Can business‐oriented managers be effective leaders for corporate sustainability? A study of integrative and instrumental logics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 339-352, February.
    8. Dominik Zimon & Peter Madzik & Robert Sroufe, 2020. "The Influence of ISO 9001 & ISO 14001 on Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Suparak Suriyankietkaew & Phallapa Petison, 2019. "A Retrospective and Foresight: Bibliometric Review of International Research on Strategic Management for Sustainability, 1991–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Elisabete Correia & Helena Carvalho & Susana G. Azevedo & Kannan Govindan, 2017. "Maturity Models in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, January.
    11. Hesty Erviani Zulaecha & Yuswar Z. Basri & Yvonne Augustine & Susi Dwi Mulyani, 2021. "The effect of sustainability management practice, enterprise risk management, and business strategies on integrated sustainability performance with intellectual capital as a moderating variable," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 23(1), pages 401-414, September.
    12. Elena Lascu & Irina Severin & Florina Daniela Lascu & Razvan Adrian Gudana & Gabriela Nalbitoru & Nicoleta Daniela Ignat, 2021. "Framework on Performance Management in Automotive Industry: A Case Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Erlin Trisyulianti & Budhi Prihartono & Made Andriani & Kadarsah Suryadi, 2023. "A conceptual framework for a value‐based sustainability balanced scorecard," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1536-1552, June.
    14. Ekaterina Yatskovskaya & Jagjit Singh Srai & Mukesh Kumar, 2018. "Integrated Supply Network Maturity Model: Water Scarcity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Minh Hue Nguyen & Anh Chi Phan & Yoshiki Matsui, 2018. "Contribution of Quality Management Practices to Sustainability Performance of Vietnamese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-31, January.
    16. Aawag Mohsen Alawag & Wesam Salah Alaloul & M. S. Liew & Abdullah O. Baarimah & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi, 2023. "The Role of the Total-Quality-Management (TQM) Drivers in Overcoming the Challenges of Implementing TQM in Industrialized-Building-System (IBS) Projects in Malaysia: Experts’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Thomas, Manoj T., 2018. "Developing a capstone course on ecological and social sustainability in business education," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 949-958.
    18. repec:thr:techub:10023:y:2021:i:1:p:401-414 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Bartosz Spychalski, 2023. "Holistic Education for Sustainable Development: A Study of Shaping the Pro-Quality Attitude of Students in the Polish Educational System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Paulina Golinska-Dawson & Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Monika Kosacka-Olejnik, 2021. "Responsible Resource Management in Remanufacturing—Framework for Qualitative Assessment in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    21. Merriam Haffar & Cory Searcy, 2018. "Target‐setting for ecological resilience: Are companies setting environmental sustainability targets in line with planetary thresholds?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1079-1092, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4239-:d:255044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.