IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jhecon/v105y2026ics0167629625001328.html

Has the shortened drug distribution chain cut drug prices? Evidence from the Two-Invoice System in China

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xiaoxi
  • Liu, Fanyu
  • Yan, Jianye
  • Yin, Nina

Abstract

Global concerns over rising drug prices have led to regulatory efforts in the pharmaceutical industry targeting price transparency and distribution efficiency. This study examines the impact of China’s Two-Invoice System (TIS), a 2016 reform aimed at reducing drug costs by streamlining the pharmaceutical distribution chain and enhancing price transparency. With a theoretical model, we examine the decision-making for pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors on pricing and promotion activities. We predict competing effects on drug prices: while intermediary markups inflated by double marginalization are reduced, the removal of efficient distributors may elevate supply chain expenses. Using a staggered difference-in-differences approach with procurement data from 2015 to 2019, we find that the implementation of TIS led to a 1.9% increase in average drug prices, contrary to policy expectations. Price increases were more pronounced for lower-priced drugs and in wealthier regions, for which the supply chain markups are limited and the effect of efficiency disruption might dominate. We also document a significant increase in sales and marketing expenses of the manufacturers, who are supposed to have absorbed a considerable amount of promotional costs previously borne by distributors. These findings underscore the unintended inefficiencies of regulatory reforms, highlighting the need for a balanced policy design that considers both cost control and market dynamics in healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xiaoxi & Liu, Fanyu & Yan, Jianye & Yin, Nina, 2026. "Has the shortened drug distribution chain cut drug prices? Evidence from the Two-Invoice System in China," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:105:y:2026:i:c:s0167629625001328
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629625001328
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:105:y:2026:i:c:s0167629625001328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505560 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.