IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of consumer archetypes on online purchase decision-making processes and outcomes: A behavioural process perspective


  • Karimi, Sahar
  • Holland, Christopher P.
  • Papamichail, K. Nadia


This study investigates differences in online purchase behaviour between consumer archetypes. It shows how consumers' decision-making styles and product knowledge define distinct archetypal behaviour that shapes online purchase processes and affects decision-related outcomes: satisfaction with choice; and satisfaction with process. The first study proposes a new modelling approach that creates an accurate representation of decision-making behaviour. Using this method, a clear structure that underlies seemingly chaotic purchase processes is identified. This structure offers an analytical tool capable of capturing behavioural differences between archetypes. The results show that decision-making style and product knowledge affect the structure and complexity of decision-making processes. The second study found that consumers with higher product knowledge are more satisfied with decision-making process and that this relationship is mediated by the duration of decision-making. Maximizers are more satisfied with their choice than satisficers, and this relationship is mediated by the number of alternatives that are evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Karimi, Sahar & Holland, Christopher P. & Papamichail, K. Nadia, 2018. "The impact of consumer archetypes on online purchase decision-making processes and outcomes: A behavioural process perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 71-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:71-82
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.038

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:91:y:2018:i:c:p:71-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.