IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v131y2024ics0140988324001075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does gender diversity in politics improve access to electricity and electrification inequality? A global analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rustagi, Niharika
  • Opoku, Eric Evans Osei
  • Acheampong, Alex O.

Abstract

Vast literature expounds that women are more sustainability-conscious and are more affected by issues of energy poverty. Another strand of literature upholds the effect of women's empowerment on social and sustainability outcomes. Goal 5 of the Sustainable Development Goals, among other things, seeks to reduce gender inequality, intensify women's empowerment and increase the participation and involvement of women in decision-making and politics. In line with this, this paper seeks to examine the impact of women's involvement in decision-making, and in this case, politics on access to electricity and the rural-urban divide in access to electricity. Women's involvement in politics is measured with the percentage of women holding seats in national parliaments. With a global sample of 111 countries over the period 2000–2020 and employing event study analysis and instrumental variable estimation with gender quota as an instrument, the following results are observed. Firstly, the event study analysis shows that access to electricity and equality in access to electricity are higher and significantly different for the adopters of gender quotas than the countries that never adopted the gender quotas policy. Secondly, an increase in women parliamentarians is associated with a significant increase in access to electricity and rural-urban equality in access to electricity. Thirdly, these findings are broadly consistent and robust across geographical regions and income groups (except for upper-middle-income countries). Lastly, increase in women parliamentarians is associated with a significant increase in access to electricity and rural-urban equality in access to electricity in countries with reserved seat quotas and not countries with candidate quotas. Our findings highlight that empowering women politically could contribute to addressing global energy poverty while ensuring equity in energy access.

Suggested Citation

  • Rustagi, Niharika & Opoku, Eric Evans Osei & Acheampong, Alex O., 2024. "Does gender diversity in politics improve access to electricity and electrification inequality? A global analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:131:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324001075
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324001075
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gender diversity; Women in politics; Electricity; Energy poverty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • P18 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Energy; Environment
    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:131:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324001075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.