IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v83y2024ics1043951x23001906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring digital government service performance: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Bei
  • Zhong, Ruohan
  • Wei, Chu

Abstract

Digital services of the public sector are regarded as one of the most crucial aspects of the administrative system's reform. However, empirical studies on digital services are insufficient, especially for service performance evaluation. This paper establishes a conceptual framework to model service performance with quantity and quality output measures. Based on the panel data of Chinese cities from 2017 to 2020, we employ a one-step stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to estimate the city's digital government service efficiency (DGSE) and examine its drivers. The findings suggest that the proposed analytical framework is applicable to the public sector performance measurement when quantitative and qualitative outputs are considered. Second, Chinese cities' DGSE levels ranged from 0.149 to 0.999, with a mean of 0.798. The DGSE score also shows significant spatio-temporal heterogeneity, with the eastern area performing best, followed by the middle and western regions, and the northeastern region performing the worst. Further, exogenous factors such as fiscal decentralization, public-private partnership, urban scale, the mayor's ability, and policy intervention substantially affect the DGSE level. The results have significant policy implications for governments' digital transition in the ongoing global digital era.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Bei & Zhong, Ruohan & Wei, Chu, 2024. "Measuring digital government service performance: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:83:y:2024:i:c:s1043951x23001906
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X23001906
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:83:y:2024:i:c:s1043951x23001906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.