IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05932-3.html

Institutional pressure, resource orchestration, and the digital government performance: a mixed methods study in the case of China

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Men

    (Central South University)

  • Yuanyuan Xu

    (Central South University)

  • Kaiyi Yang

    (Central South University)

  • Zijian Wang

    (Central South University)

  • Xiang Ji

    (Columbia University)

Abstract

Governments worldwide are rapidly embracing digital transformation; however, limited attention has been paid to how local governments navigate under multiple pressures, including those from higher-level authorities, the public, and regional competition. Drawing on institutional pressure (IP) and resource orchestration (RO) theories, this study constructs an IP–RO framework to examine how these factors interact to achieve high digital government (DG) performance. Using a mixed-methods approach combining regression analysis and panel data QCA, this study demonstrates how local governments orchestrate resources to respond to multifaceted pressures, identifies the configuration paths, and reveals that local governments are gaining greater autonomy in shaping digital initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Men & Yuanyuan Xu & Kaiyi Yang & Zijian Wang & Xiang Ji, 2025. "Institutional pressure, resource orchestration, and the digital government performance: a mixed methods study in the case of China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05932-3
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05932-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05932-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05932-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tangi, Luca & Janssen, Marijn & Benedetti, Michele & Noci, Giuliano, 2021. "Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    2. Alzahrani, Latifa & Al-Karaghouli, Wafi & Weerakkody, Vishanth, 2017. "Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 164-175.
    3. Nathalie Haug & Sorin Dan & Ines Mergel, 2024. "Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 1963-1987, July.
    4. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    5. Jakob Trischler & Jessica Westman Trischler, 2022. "Design for experience – a public service design approach in the age of digitalization," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 1251-1270, August.
    6. Du, Yunzhou & Kim, Phillip H., 2021. "One size does not fit all: Strategy configurations, complex environments, and new venture performance in emerging economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 272-285.
    7. Anna Sanina & Aleksey Balashov & Mariia Rubtcova, 2023. "The Socio-Economic Efficiency of Digital Government Transformation," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 85-96, January.
    8. Douglas, Evan J. & Shepherd, Dean A. & Prentice, Catherine, 2020. "Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis for a finer-grained understanding of entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    9. Borrás, Susana & Edler, Jakob, 2020. "The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems' transformation," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 65, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    10. Ribeiro-Navarrete, Samuel & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Lassala, Carlos & Ulrich, Klaus, 2021. "Key factors of information management for crowdfunding investor satisfaction," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    11. Ashaye, Olusoyi Richard & Irani, Zahir, 2019. "The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 253-270.
    12. Eva Thomann & Martino Maggetti, 2020. "Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(2), pages 356-386, May.
    13. Christoph Niessen, 2024. "Longitudinal QCA: Integrating Time Through Change-Based Intervals (CBIs) and a Flexible Lag Condition (FLC)," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 53(4), pages 1846-1872, November.
    14. Pieter-Tjerk de Boer & Dirk Kroese & Shie Mannor & Reuven Rubinstein, 2005. "A Tutorial on the Cross-Entropy Method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 19-67, February.
    15. Liu, Hui-hui & Yang, Guo-liang & Liu, Xiao-xiao & Song, Yao-yao, 2020. "R&D performance assessment of industrial enterprises in China: A two-stage DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. J. Ramon Gil-Garcia & Sharon S. Dawes & Theresa A. Pardo, 2018. "Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 633-646, May.
    17. Zhu, Bei & Zhong, Ruohan & Wei, Chu, 2024. "Measuring digital government service performance: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Yue Yuan & Xiaoyang Guo & Yang Shen, 2024. "Digitalization Drives the Green Transformation of Agriculture-Related Enterprises: A Case Study of A-Share Agriculture-Related Listed Companies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, August.
    19. Xingyu Qian, 2024. "Fragmented property rights and their risks on foreclosed housing: a qualitative comparative analysis based on judicial auctions in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Qingguo Meng & Ziteng Fan, 2022. "Punctuations and diversity: exploring dynamics of attention allocation in China’s E-government agenda," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 502-521, May.
    21. Borrás, Susana & Edler, Jakob, 2020. "The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    22. Anne Jacqueminet, 2020. "Practice Implementation Within a Multidivisional Firm: The Role of Institutional Pressures and Value Consistency," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 182-199, January.
    23. Beynon, Malcolm J. & Jones, Paul & Pickernell, David, 2020. "Country-level entrepreneurial attitudes and activity through the years: A panel data analysis using fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 443-455.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandip Mukhopadhyay & Sumedha Chauhan & Manas Paul & Subhajit Bhattacharyya & Parijat Upadhyay & Shekhar Kumar Sinha, 2025. "Why do few Organizations Succeed while Others Fail? Impact of Organizational Capabilities and Barriers on Digital Government Transformation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 2213-2231, October.
    2. Michael Olumekor, 2024. "Fuzzy Methods in Entrepreneurship Research," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 33(2), pages 365-392, May.
    3. Songsong Cheng & Qunpeng Fan & Minghao Huang, 2023. "Strategic Orientation, Dynamic Capabilities, and Digital Transformation of Commercial Banks: A Fuzzy-Set QCA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Hufnagl, Miriam, 2025. "Unboxing innovation policy strategies: An empirical exploration on objectives, coordination, and capacity," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 91, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    5. Di Paola, Nadia & Chari, Simos & Iannacci, Federico & Kraus, Sascha, 2025. "Configurational theory in business and management research: Status quo and guidelines for the application of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Jin, Zhizhou & Zeng, Saixing & Chen, Hongquan & Shi, Jonathan Jingsheng, 2022. "Explaining the expansion performance in technological capability of participants in megaprojects: A configurational approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Vyacheslav V. Volchik & Elena V. Fursa, 2023. "Russian innovation system: Narratives and economic policy," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 24(4), pages 22-40, January.
    8. Bellink, Miriam & Verburg, René W., 2023. "A system lock-in blocks the uptake of mixed sustainable Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Zheng, Xian & Du, Xinyi & Wu, Weihao, 2025. "The impact of digital government on cross-regional investment: Evidence from Chinese cities," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 99-122.
    10. Mengyuan Lu & Bin Guo & Xinyu Wang, 2025. "Revitalizing Idle Rural Homesteads: Configurational Paths of Farmer Differentiation and Cognition Synergistically Driving Revitalization Intentions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, April.
    11. Kervall, Mikael & Pålsson, Henrik & Khan, Jamil, 2026. "Sustainable urban freight transition governance in small and medium-sized cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Wang, Liangcheng & Chen, Yizheng, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Inga Ulnicane & William Knight & Tonii Leach & Bernd Carsten Stahl & Winter-Gladys Wanjiku, 2021. "Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:insights from AI policy [The next space race is Artificial Intelligence]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(2), pages 158-177.
    14. Jinyan Wen & Donghua Tan & Honglue Wang & Yanxiao Gao, 2025. "How Do Alliance Networks Affect Firms’ Capability of Influencing Technological Standardization? Configuration Analysis Based on the TOE Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Yangjie Huang & Sihui Li & Xiyuan Xiang & Leilei Huang, 2024. "Analyzing the configuration of the National Innovation System for Innovation Capability: evidence from Global Innovation Index reports," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Robinson, Douglas K.R. & Schoen, Antoine & Larédo, Philippe & Gallart, Jordi Molas & Warnke, Philine & Kuhlmann, Stefan & Ordóñez-Matamoros, Gonzalo, 2021. "Policy lensing of future-oriented strategic intelligence: An experiment connecting foresight with decision making contexts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    17. Chen, Kaihua & Xue, Zehua & Guo, Rui & Ning, Lutao, 2025. "The holistic role of multi-level government in transformative innovation process: Theoretical framework and evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. Arjan J. Frederiks & Sílvia Costa & Boudewijn Hulst & Aard J. Groen, 2024. "The early bird catches the worm: The role of regulatory uncertainty in early adoption of blockchain’s cryptocurrency by fintech ventures," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(2), pages 790-823, March.
    19. Du, Yunzhou & Kim, Phillip H. & Fan, Di & Su, Yiyi, 2025. "Zooming in and out for strategic advantage: Slack configurations and R&D investments in high-growth firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    20. Zhou, Tianxiao & Hu, Yuyao & Shan, Liping & Xiong, Changsheng, 2025. "What factors contribute to self-organized collective action for old village reconstruction? A qualitative comparative analysis of 36 villages in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05932-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/palcomms/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.