IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bjafio/v19y2021i2p177-192n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Certified Supply Chains More Socially Sustainable? A Bargaining Power Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Muller Paul

    (BETA, CNRS - University of Lorraine – University of Strasbourg & INRAE, Nancy, France)

  • Böhm Michael

    (ECOZEPT, Freising, Germany)

  • Csillag Péter

    (ECO-SENSUS Research and Communication, Szekszárd, Hungary)

  • Donati Michele

    (University of Parma, Parma, Italy)

  • Drut Marion

    (CESAER, AgroSup Dijon, INRAE, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France)

  • Ferrer-Pérez Hugo

    (Centre for Agro-Food Economy & Development, UPC-IRTA, Castelldefels, Spain)

  • Gauvrit Lisa

    (ECOZEPT, Freising, Germany)

  • Gil Jose M.

    (Centre for Agro-Food Economy & Development, UPC-IRTA, Castelldefels, Spain)

  • Hoang Viet

    (University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam)

  • Malak-Rawlikowska Agata

    (Warsaw University of Life Science, Warsaw, Poland)

  • Mattas Konstadinos

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Napasintuwong Orachos

    (Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand)

  • Nguyen An

    (University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam)

  • Papadopoulos Ioannis

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Ristic Bojan

    (University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Stojanovic Zaklina

    (University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Török Áron

    (ECO-SENSUS Research and Communication, Szekszárd, Hungary)

  • Tsakiridou Efthimia

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Veneziani Mario

    (University of Parma, Parma, Italy)

  • Bellassen Valentin

    (CESAER, AgroSup Dijon, INRAE, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France)

Abstract

Food quality schemes (FQS: organic and geographical indication products) are often supposed to be more sustainable by their political advocates. We explore the social sustainability advantage of FQS through the lens of supply chains’ bargaining power (BP) distribution. We propose an indicator synthesizing different sources underlying BP (competition-based, transactional, institutional) and counting two dimensions (fair BP distribution and adaptation capacity), that we apply to 18 FQS supply chains and corresponding reference. FQS perform better than their reference products on both dimensions. This better performance is due to a combination of sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Muller Paul & Böhm Michael & Csillag Péter & Donati Michele & Drut Marion & Ferrer-Pérez Hugo & Gauvrit Lisa & Gil Jose M. & Hoang Viet & Malak-Rawlikowska Agata & Mattas Konstadinos & Napasintuwong O, 2021. "Are Certified Supply Chains More Socially Sustainable? A Bargaining Power Analysis," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 177-192, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:19:y:2021:i:2:p:177-192:n:8
    DOI: 10.1515/jafio-2019-0039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2019-0039
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jafio-2019-0039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominique Barjolle & Jean-Marc Chappuis, 2000. "Coordination des acteurs dans deux filières aoc Une approche par la théorie des coûts de transaction," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 258(1), pages 90-100.
    2. Bresnahan, Timothy F., 1982. "The oligopoly solution concept is identified," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 10(1-2), pages 87-92.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2722 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Meric S. Gertler, 2003. "Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there)," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 75-99, January.
    5. Céline Bonnet & Zohra Bouamra-Mechemache, 2016. "Organic Label, Bargaining Power, and Profit-sharing in the French Fluid Milk Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(1), pages 113-133.
    6. Christophe Bontemps & Zohra Bouamra-Mechemache & Michel Simioni, 2013. "Quality labels and firm survival: some first empirical evidence," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 40(3), pages 413-439, July.
    7. Éric Giraud-Héraud & Louis-Georges Soler, 2003. "Quelle légitimité à des mécanismes de régulation de l'offre dans les Appellations d'origine protégée?," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 277(1), pages 123-134.
    8. Tasadduq A. Shervani & Gary Frazier & Goutam Challagalla, 2007. "The moderating influence of firm market power on the transaction cost economics model: An empirical test in a forward channel integration context," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 635-652, June.
    9. Russell W. Coff, 1999. "When Competitive Advantage Doesn't Lead to Performance: The Resource-Based View and Stakeholder Bargaining Power," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 119-133, April.
    10. Meric S. Gertler, 2001. "Best practice? Geography, learning and the institutional limits to strong convergence," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 5-26, January.
    11. Tomislav Vukina & Porametr Leegomonchai, 2006. "Oligopsony Power, Asset Specificity, and Hold-Up: Evidence from the Broiler Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(3), pages 589-605.
    12. North, Douglass C, 1994. "Economic Performance through Time," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 359-368, June.
    13. Hinnerk Gnutzmann & Oskar Kowalewski & Piotr Śpiewanowski, 2020. "Market Structure and Resilience: Evidence from Potash Mine Disasters," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 911-933, May.
    14. Emma Brandon-Jones & Brian Squire & Chad W. Autry & Kenneth J. Petersen, 2014. "A Contingent Resource-Based Perspective of Supply Chain Resilience and Robustness," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 50(3), pages 55-73, July.
    15. Maryline Filippi, 2014. "Using the Regional Advantage: French Agricultural Cooperatives' Economic and Governance Tool," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 597-615, December.
    16. Maureen Blyler & Russell W. Coff, 2003. "Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: ties that split pies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(7), pages 677-686, July.
    17. Paul Muller, 2006. "Reputation, trust and the dynamics of leadership in communities of practice," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 10(4), pages 381-400, November.
    18. Williamson, Oliver E, 1981. "The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1537-1568, December.
    19. Skilton, Paul F., 2009. "Knowledge based resources, property based resources and supplier bargaining power in Hollywood motion picture projects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 834-840, August.
    20. Sylvain Amisse & Isabelle Leroux & Paul Muller, 2012. "Proximities and Logics Underlying Cluster Dynamics: The Case of the Ornamental Horticulture Cluster in Maine-et-Loire," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 265-283, April.
    21. Loïc Sauvée, 2005. "Alignment between quality enforcement devices and governance structures in the agri-food vertical chains," Post-Print hal-00155424, HAL.
    22. A. P. Lerner, 1934. "The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 157-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viet Hoang & Vinh Nguyen, 2023. "Determinants of small farmers' participation in contract farming in developing countries: A study in Vietnam," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 836-853, July.
    2. Bellassen, Valentin & Drut, Marion & Hilal, Mohamed & Bodini, Antonio & Donati, Michele & de Labarre, Matthieu Duboys & Filipović, Jelena & Gauvrit, Lisa & Gil, José M. & Hoang, Viet & Malak-Rawlikows, 2022. "The economic, environmental and social performance of European certified food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Meirelles, Franklin de Souza & Giraldi, Janaina de Moura Engracia & Campos, Rodolfo Paião de, 2023. "Transaction costs economics and geographical indications: a systematic analysis of the literature," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 61(4), January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mydland, Ørjan & Størdal, Ståle & Kumbhakar, Subal C. & Lien, Gudbrand, 2022. "Modeling markups and its determinants: The case of Norwegian industries and regions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 252-262.
    2. Irz, Xavier & Mazzocchi, Mario & Réquillart, Vincent & Soler, Louis-Georges, 2015. "Research in Food Economics: past trends and new challenges," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 96(01), pages 187-237, March.
    3. Skilton, Paul F., 2009. "Knowledge based resources, property based resources and supplier bargaining power in Hollywood motion picture projects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 834-840, August.
    4. Thomas, Alban & Lamine, Claire & Allès, Benjamin & Chiffoleau, Yuna & Doré, Antoine & Dubuisson-Quellier, Sophie & Hannachi, Mourad, 2020. "The key roles of economic and social organization and producer and consumer behaviour towards a health-agriculture-food-environment nexus: recent advances and future prospects," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(01), August.
    5. Carbó, Santiago & Humphrey, David & Maudos, Joaquín & Molyneux, Philip, 2009. "Cross-country comparisons of competition and pricing power in European banking," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 115-134, February.
    6. Preuss, Lutz & Vazquez-Brust, Diego & Yakovleva, Natalia & Foroughi, Hamid & Mutti, Diana, 2022. "When social movements close institutional voids: Triggers, processes, and consequences for multinational enterprises," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    7. Julian Inchauspe & Tom Cronje, 2020. "Concentration and Competition in the Australian Banking Industry: A Bresnahan–Lau Structure–Conduct–Performance Assessment," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 96(315), pages 431-449, December.
    8. Bogdan Capraru & Nicoleta-Livia Pintilie, 2017. "Assessing competition in the European Union banking sector," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 9(1), pages 007-026, June.
    9. Elisabet Garriga, 2014. "Beyond Stakeholder Utility Function: Stakeholder Capability in the Value Creation Process," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(4), pages 489-507, April.
    10. Byeong‐Il Ahn & Hyunok Lee, 2010. "An equilibrium displacement approach to oligopoly market analysis: an application to trade in the Korean infant formula market," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(2), pages 101-109, March.
    11. Nicolaï Foss & Nils Stieglitz, 2012. "Modern Resource-based Theory(ies)," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Noelke, Corinna M. & Raper, Kellie Curry, 1999. "Nonstructural And Statistical Nonparametric Market Power Tests: An Empirical Investigation," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21645, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Lukáš Čechura & Antonella Samoggia & Tinoush Jamali Jaghdani, 2024. "Concentration, market imperfections, and interbranch organization in the Italian processed tomato supply chain," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(4), pages 603-620, July.
    14. Baldwin, Kenneth & Alhalboni, Maryam, 2023. "A value-based measure of market power for the participatory deposits of Islamic banks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Barbara Casu & Claudia Girardone & Philip Molyneux, 2012. "Is There a Conflict between Competition and Financial Stability?," Chapters, in: James R. Barth & Chen Lin & Clas Wihlborg (ed.), Research Handbook on International Banking and Governance, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Younge, Kenneth A. & Tong, Tony W., 2018. "Competitive pressure on the rate and scope of innovation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 162-181.
    17. Anant K. Sundaram & Andrew C. Inkpen, 2004. "The Corporate Objective Revisited," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 350-363, June.
    18. Pitelis, Christos & Teece, David, 2009. "The (new) nature and essence of the firm," MPRA Paper 24317, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Lu, Hao & Oh, Won-Yong & Kleffner, Anne & Chang, Young Kyun, 2021. "How do investors value corporate social responsibility? Market valuation and the firm specific contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 14-25.
    20. Jean-Paul Chavas & Guanming Shi & Kyle Stiegert, 2020. "Pricing and Industry Structure when Demand Elasticity Changes," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 57(4), pages 891-907, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:19:y:2021:i:2:p:177-192:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.