IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y1995i39p67-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unraveling Trend and Stationary Components of Total Factor Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Franz C. Palm
  • Gérard A. Pfann

Abstract

We propose a methodology to analyze the dynamic features of total factor productivity (TFP). Factor efficiency is assumed to evolve according to an unobserved component model which has the form of a dynamic version of factor analysis and which nests most of the specifications for technology shocks used in the literature. We show under which conditions the processes generating the components can be identified from measurements of TFP only. We also discuss how additional information on the technology shocks can be obtained from the factor demand equations associated with the production technology. The methodology is applied to quarterly data for the manufacturing industry in the Netherlands 1971.1-1990.IV. Technology is found to be driven by a stochastic trend with a first order moving average part. This finding is similar to results obtained by Lippi and Reichlin (1994) among others; The findings for TFP corroborate earlier findings for the dynamic features of technology in labor and cpaital demand equations for the manufacturing industry in the Netherlands.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz C. Palm & Gérard A. Pfann, 1995. "Unraveling Trend and Stationary Components of Total Factor Productivity," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 39, pages 67-92.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1995:i:39:p:67-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20076003
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Markus Eberhardt & Francis Teal, 2011. "Econometrics For Grumblers: A New Look At The Literature On Cross‐Country Growth Empirics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 109-155, 02.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:1995:i:39:p:67-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.