IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iab/iabfob/202111.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die deutsche Wirtschaft in der Pandemie

Author

Listed:
  • Dettmann, Eva

    (Leibniz- Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle – IWH)

  • Diegmann, André

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany ; Leibniz- Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle – IWH)

  • Mertens, Matthias

    (Leibniz- Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle – IWH)

  • Müller, Steffen

    (Leibniz- Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle – IWH)

  • Plümpe, Verena

    (Leibniz- Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle – IWH)

  • Leber, Ute

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

  • Schwengler, Barbara

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany)

Abstract

"At the beginning of the year 2020 the Corona pandemic terminated the longest period of economic growth in reunified Germany. Even the first wave of the Corona crisis represents a major cut in the business activities of many establishments in Germany. During the survey, i.e. between June and October 2020, around two-thirds of all firms in western and eastern Germany were affected by the negative impact of the pandemic or the measures taken to control it’s spreading. 85 percent and thus by far the majority of establishments in Germany assess the decline in demand as the biggest problem. Besides, officially ordered closures had a negative impact on business activities of around one third of the establishments. In particular, small establishments (nine percent) and micro-establishments (twelve percent) are afraid of having to give up their business. Among establishments in hotel business and gastronomy and other personal services, the share of establishments threatened with insolvency is particularly high. Many establishments adapt to the new situation by changing their business activities and personnel policy. Various forms of short-term working time adjustments like balancing working time accounts or vacation arrangements are common. Besides, short-time work arrangements play a major role in many establishments. In addition, flexible forms of work and the flexibilization of working hours become more important. Around one third of all firms have introduced or expanded home office opportunities for their employees; in sectors where work can be organized more decentral and the presence of personnel is not always required, the proportion is more than twice as high. In addition, a rising number of establishments apply part-time working models to gain flexibility in working time. A pandemic-related reduction in the workforce is rather rare in both West German and East German establishments. However, the general labor market dynamics weakened significantly in 2020, especially in micro-establishments employment growth is negative. The demand for skilled employees declines for the first time in 2020: in both western and eastern Germany, we observe a drop of around one third. Also the non-occupancy quota for skilled labor declines to 32 percent in western Germany and 37 percent in eastern Germany. Even in the current situation, vocational training plays an important role for many establishments; about 50 percent of the eligible firms actually provide vocational training. However, the survey also reveals that particularly small establishments and firms in eastern Germany have increasing problems to find suitable apprentices. A multivariate analysis examines the relationship between a firm's economic success in the past and the severity of its affection by the crisis. The results suggest that the previous year's revenue in particular has a high impact on the effect of the pandemic on establishments. A (very) good earnings situation in the past appears to act like a buffer that can cushion the initial consequences and thus the negative effects of the pandemic. Labor productivity and employment growth, although economically influential for the severity of liquidity constraints, have rather small impacts on the strength of the corona effects for establishments." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Suggested Citation

  • Dettmann, Eva & Diegmann, André & Mertens, Matthias & Müller, Steffen & Plümpe, Verena & Leber, Ute & Schwengler, Barbara, 2021. "Die deutsche Wirtschaft in der Pandemie," IAB-Forschungsbericht 202111, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
  • Handle: RePEc:iab:iabfob:202111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doku.iab.de/forschungsbericht/2021/fb1121.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan A. Decker & John Haltiwanger & Ron S. Jarmin & Javier Miranda, 2020. "Changing Business Dynamism and Productivity: Shocks versus Responsiveness," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(12), pages 3952-3990, December.
    2. Diego Restuccia & Richard Rogerson, 2017. "The Causes and Costs of Misallocation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(3), pages 151-174, Summer.
    3. Marianne Bertrand & Sandra E Black & Sissel Jensen & Adriana Lleras-Muney, 2019. "Breaking the Glass Ceiling? The Effect of Board Quotas on Female Labour Market Outcomes in Norway," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(1), pages 191-239.
    4. David Autor & David Dorn & Lawrence F Katz & Christina Patterson & John Van Reenen, 2020. "The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms [“Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor”]," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(2), pages 645-709.
    5. Chang-Tai Hsieh & Peter J. Klenow, 2014. "The Life Cycle of Plants in India and Mexico," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(3), pages 1035-1084.
    6. David A. Matsa & Amalia R. Miller, 2011. "Chipping Away at the Glass Ceiling: Gender Spillovers in Corporate Leadership," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(3), pages 635-639, May.
    7. W. Walker Hanlon, 2015. "Necessity Is the Mother of Invention: Input Supplies and Directed Technical Change," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 67-100, January.
    8. Roberto A. Weber, 2006. "Managing Growth to Achieve Efficient Coordination in Large Groups," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(1), pages 114-126, March.
    9. Aghion, Philippe & Howitt, Peter, 2005. "Growth with Quality-Improving Innovations: An Integrated Framework," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 2, pages 67-110, Elsevier.
    10. John Haltiwanger & Ron S. Jarmin & Javier Miranda, 2013. "Who Creates Jobs? Small versus Large versus Young," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(2), pages 347-361, May.
    11. Müller, Steffen & Dettmann, Eva & Fackler, Daniel & Neuschäffer, Georg & Slavtchev, Viktor & Leber, Ute & Schwengler, Barbara, 2017. "Produktivitätsunterschiede zwischen West- und Ostdeutschland und mögliche Erklärungsfaktoren : Ergebnisse aus dem IAB-Betriebspanel 2016," IAB-Forschungsbericht 201716, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    12. David A. Matsa & Amalia R. Miller, 2011. "Chipping Away at the Glass Ceiling: Gender Spillovers in Corporate Leadership," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, pages 635-639.
    13. Steffen Mueller & Jens Stegmaier, 2015. "Economic failure and the role of plant age and size," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 621-638, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Truger, Achim & Wieland, Volker, 2019. "Den Strukturwandel meistern. Jahresgutachten 2019/20 [Dealing with Structural Change. Annual Report 2019/20]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201920.
    2. Alex Coad, 2018. "Firm age: a survey," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 13-43, January.
    3. Mario Bossler & Alexander Mosthaf & Thorsten Schank, 2016. "More Female Manager Hires through More Female Managers? Evidence from Germany," Working Papers 1618, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    4. Pedro Bento & Diego Restuccia, 2019. "The Role of Nonemployers in Business Dynamism and Aggregate Productivity," Working Papers tecipa-640, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    5. Michèle Müller-Itten & Aniko Öry, 2022. "Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 402-444, May.
    6. Helene Maghin, 2022. "Cracks in the Boards: The Opportunity Cost of Governance Homogeneity," CESifo Working Paper Series 9816, CESifo.
    7. Vincent Sterk & Petr Sedláček & Benjamin Pugsley, 2021. "The Nature of Firm Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(2), pages 547-579, February.
    8. Kuzmina, Olga & Melentyeva, Valentina, 2020. "Gender diversity in corporate boards: Evidence from quota-implied discontinuities," CEPR Discussion Papers 14942, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Giannetti, Mariassunta & Wang, Tracy Yue, 2020. "Public Attention to Gender Equality and the Demand for Female Directors," CEPR Discussion Papers 14503, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Keller, Wolfgang & Molina, Teresa & Olney, William W., 2023. "The gender gap among top business executives," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 270-286.
    11. Biasi, Barbara & Sarsons, Heather, 2020. "Flexible Wages, Bargaining, and the Gender Gap," IZA Discussion Papers 13754, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Sule Alan & Corekcioglu & Mustafa Kaba & Matthias Sutter, 2023. "Female Leadership and Workplace Climate," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2023_09, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    13. Pipke, David & Pönitzsch, Gert, 2015. "Effekte der Frauenquote in Aufsichtsräten: Ein Ausblick für Deutschland," Kiel Policy Brief 93, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Steven Bednar & Dora Gicheva, 2018. "Career Implications of Having a Female-Friendly Supervisor," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 71(2), pages 426-457, March.
    15. Bento, Pedro & Ranasinghe, Ashantha, 2020. "Financial Frictions, Borrowing Costs, and Firm Size Across Sectors," Working Papers 2020-7, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
    16. Michèle Müller-Itten & Aniko Ory, 2017. "Mentoring and the Dynamics of Affirmative Action," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 3012, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    17. Iga Magda & Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska, 2018. "Do female managers help to lower within-firm gender pay gaps? Public institutions vs. private enterprises," IBS Working Papers 08/2018, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    18. Stephan Klasen & Anna Minasyan, 2021. "Affirmative Action and Intersectionality at the Top: Evidence from South Africa," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 3-35, January.
    19. Marcela Eslava & John C. Haltiwanger & Alvaro Pinzón, 2019. "Job creation in Colombia vs the U.S.: “up or out dynamics” meets “the life cycle of plants”," NBER Working Papers 25550, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Goldin, Ian & Koutroumpis, Pantelis & Lafond, François & Winkler, Julian, 2020. "Why is productivity slowing down?," MPRA Paper 99172, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabfob:202111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.