IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Design and scenario assessment for collaborative logistics and freight transport systems

  • Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu

    ()

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - CNRS : UMR5593 - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État [ENTPE] - Université Lumière - Lyon II)

  • Joelle Morana

    ()

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - CNRS : UMR5593 - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État [ENTPE] - Université Lumière - Lyon II)

  • Josep-Maria Salanova Grau

    (Hellenic Institute or Transport - Center of Research and Technologie Hellas)

  • Tai-Yu Ma

    ()

    (LET - Laboratoire d'économie des transports - CNRS : UMR5593 - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État [ENTPE] - Université Lumière - Lyon II)

Registered author(s):

    Collaboration between partners is a very popular subject in both logistics and decision support research. However, transport management is often taken into account only as an external cost, without integration in collaborative reasoning. This paper proposes a framework to assess collaborative solutions in the context of logistics and freight transport, as well as to describe the links between freight transport and supply chain managementin terms of collaboration techniques. First the main concepts of collaborative logistics in the distribution and transport fields are presented, highlighting the links between collaboration, freight transport and supply chain management. Then, the method to assess collaborative logistics and freight transport solutions is proposed. This method includes a design scheme, a hierarchic clustering technique and a dominance analysis method to unify the assessment of each individual and prepare collaborative research for a common solution. After that, the method is applied to the assessment of five scenarios derived from a real situation for the urban area of Lyon, France) to illustrate how difficult convergence towards consensus is. The results show that a global optimal solution for the entire set of stakeholders is not easy to identify, and how the proposed method can be helpful for decision makers to achieve a consensus of common objectives.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/84/47/05/PDF/Collaborative.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number halshs-00844705.

    as
    in new window

    Length:
    Date of creation: 2013
    Date of revision:
    Publication status: Published, International Journal of Transport Economics, 2013, 207-240
    Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00844705
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00844705
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci, 2013. "Urban Freight Transport Policies: Joint Accounting Of Non-Linear Attribute Effects And Discrete Mixture Heterogeneity," Working Papers 0313, CREI Università degli Studi Roma Tre, revised 2013.
    2. Edoardo Marcucci & Amanda Stathopoulos & Lucia Rotaris & Romeo Danielis, 2011. "Comparing single and joint preferences: a choice experiment on residential location in three-member households," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 43(5), pages 1209-1225, May.
    3. repec:sae:ecolab:v:16:y:2006:i:2:p:1-2 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Joelle Morana, 2011. "Collaborative transportation sharing: from theory to practice via a case study from France," Post-Print halshs-00798319, HAL.
    5. Edoardo Marcucci & Amanda Stathopoulos & Valerio Gatta & Eva Valeri, 2012. "A Stated Ranking Experiment to Study Policy Acceptance: The Case of Freight Operators in Rome’s LTZ," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2012(3), pages 11-30.
    6. Edoardo Marcucci & Romeo Danielis, 2008. "The potential demand for a urban freight consolidation centre," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 269-284, March.
    7. Danielis, Romeo & Rotaris, Lucia & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2010. "Urban freight policies and distribution channels: a discussion based on evidence from Italian cities," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 46, pages 114-146.
    8. Edoardo Marcucci & Valerio Gatta, 2013. "Intr-Agent Heterogeneity In Urban Freight Distribution: The Case Of Own Account Operators," Working Papers 0413, CREI Università degli Studi Roma Tre, revised 2013.
    9. Tudela, Alejandro & Akiki, Natalia & Cisternas, Rene, 2006. "Comparing the output of cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis: An application to urban transport investments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 414-423, June.
    10. M. Ruth & K. Donaghy & P. Kirshen, 2006. "Introduction," Chapters, in: Regional Climate Change and Variability, chapter 1 Edward Elgar.
    11. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Laporte, Gilbert, 1997. "Planning models for freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 409-438, March.
    12. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Joelle Morana, 2010. "Are City Logistics Solutions Sustainable? The Cityporto case," Post-Print halshs-00530016, HAL.
    13. Dominique Bonet Fernandez, 2014. "Pouvoir et leadership dans la supply chain," Working Papers 2014-399, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    14. Danielis, Romeo & Marcucci, Edoardo & Rotaris, Lucia, 2005. "Logistics managers' stated preferences for freight service attributes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 201-215, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00844705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.