IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v44y2015icp179-186.html

Barriers to urban freight policy implementation: The case of urban consolidation center in Oslo

Author

Listed:
  • Nordtømme, Marianne Elvsaas
  • Bjerkan, Kristin Ystmark
  • Sund, Astrid Bjørgen

Abstract

As a measure for more environmentally friendly and efficient urban freight, the Norwegian capital Oslo sought to implement a UCC demonstration in the city center. However, the process of establishing UCC as a demonstration measure within the set time frame was ultimately stopped without success. By using the experiences from this process, the paper provides a more solid basis for renewed efforts at implementation in the future. With basis in implementation theory, the study identifies key barriers to implementation of UCC. Findings indicate that the barriers are primarily related to financial concerns and stakeholder acceptability. However, institutional, practical and legal barriers are also of significance. Strategies to overcome the identified barriers are suggested, most importantly the need for establishing a credible and sound business model. The study makes use of perspectives from political science regarding implementation theory in order to facilitate urban freight policy. As such, it represents a novel scholarly approach in the field of urban freight research. The evaluation framework can be useful for similar studies to come and for policymakers in the design and implementation of new policy measures for urban freight.

Suggested Citation

  • Nordtømme, Marianne Elvsaas & Bjerkan, Kristin Ystmark & Sund, Astrid Bjørgen, 2015. "Barriers to urban freight policy implementation: The case of urban consolidation center in Oslo," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 179-186.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:44:y:2015:i:c:p:179-186
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.08.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X15300457
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.08.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Browne, Michael & Woodburn, Allan & Allen, Julian, 2007. "Evaluating the potential for urban consolidation centres," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 35, pages 46-63.
    2. Amanda Stathopoulos & Eva Valeri & Edoardo Marcucci & Edourdo Marcucci & Valerio Gatti & Agostino Nuzzolo, 2011. "Urban Freight Policy Innovation for Rome’s LTZ: A Stakeholder Perspective," Chapters, in: Cathy Macharis & Sandra Melo (ed.), City Distribution and Urban Freight Transport, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Kelly, Charlotte & May, Anthony D. & Jopson, Ann, 2008. "The development of an option generation tool to identify potential transport policy packages," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 361-371, November.
    4. May, Anthony D. & Kelly, Charlotte & Shepherd, Simon, 2006. "The principles of integration in urban transport strategies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 319-327, July.
    5. Edoardo Marcucci & Romeo Danielis, 2008. "The potential demand for a urban freight consolidation centre," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 269-284, March.
    6. Brand, C. & Mattarelli, M. & Moon, D. & Wolfler Calvo, R., 2002. "STEEDS: A strategic transport-energy-environment decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(2), pages 416-435, June.
    7. May, Anthony D. & Kelly, Charlotte & Shepherd, Simon & Jopson, Ann, 2012. "An option generation tool for potential urban transport policy packages," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 162-173.
    8. Macário, Rosario & Marques, Carlos Filipe, 2008. "Transferability of sustainable urban mobility measures," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 146-156, January.
    9. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Joëlle Morana, 2010. "Are City Logistics Solutions Sustainable? The Cityporto case," Post-Print halshs-00530016, HAL.
    10. Arampatzis, G. & Kiranoudis, C. T. & Scaloubacas, P. & Assimacopoulos, D., 2004. "A GIS-based decision support system for planning urban transportation policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 465-475, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Habibian, Meeghat & Kermanshah, Mohammad, 2013. "Coping with congestion: Understanding the role of simultaneous transportation demand management policies on commuters," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 229-237.
    2. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Joelle Morana & Josep-Maria Salanova Grau & Tai-Yu Ma, 2013. "Design And Scenario Assessment For Collaborative Logistics And Freight Transport Systems," Articles, International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. 40(2).
    3. Daniele Crotti & Elena Maggi, 2023. "Social Responsibility and Urban Consolidation Centres in Sustainable Freight Transport Markets," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 9(2), pages 829-850, July.
    4. Aljohani, Khalid & Thompson, Russell G., 2021. "Modelling individual preferences of goods receivers for a Receiver-led delivery consolidation service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 74-94.
    5. Meng Xu & Guangmin Wang & Susan Grant-Muller & Ziyou Gao, 2017. "Joint road toll pricing and capacity development in discrete transport network design problem," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 731-752, July.
    6. Musolino, Giuseppe & Rindone, Corrado & Polimeni, Antonio & Vitetta, Antonino, 2019. "Planning urban distribution center location with variable restocking demand scenarios: General methodology and testing in a medium-size town," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 157-166.
    7. Wang, Yacan & Geng, Kexin & May, Anthony D. & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "The impact of traffic demand management policy mix on commuter travel choices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 74-87.
    8. de Carvalho, Nayara Louise Alves & Ribeiro, Priscilla Cristina Cabral & García-Martos, Carolina & Fernández, Camino González & Vieira, José Geraldo Vidal, 2019. "Urban distribution centres in historical cities from the perspective of residents, retailers and carriers," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Danielis, Romeo & Maggi, Elena & Rotaris, Lucia & Valeri, Eva, 2012. "Urban supply chains and transportation policies," Working Papers 12_7, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica, revised 2012.
    10. Isa, Selma Setsumi & Lima, Orlando Fontes & Vidal Vieira, José Geraldo, 2021. "Urban consolidation centers: Impact analysis by stakeholder," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Danielis, Romeo & Maggi, Elena & Rotaris, Lucia & Valeri, Eva, 2012. "Urban supply chains and transportation policies," Working Papers 1207, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica, revised 2012.
    12. Stathopoulos, Amanda & Valeri, Eva & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2012. "Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 34-45.
    13. Lindholm, Maria Eleonor & Blinge, Magnus, 2014. "Assessing knowledge and awareness of the sustainable urban freight transport among Swedish local authority policy planners," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 124-131.
    14. Zubaryeva, Alyona & Thiel, Christian & Zaccarelli, Nicola & Barbone, Enrico & Mercier, Arnaud, 2012. "Spatial multi-criteria assessment of potential lead markets for electrified vehicles in Europe," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1477-1489.
    15. May, Anthony D. & Kelly, Charlotte & Shepherd, Simon & Jopson, Ann, 2012. "An option generation tool for potential urban transport policy packages," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 162-173.
    16. Ülengin, Füsun & Kabak, Özgür & Önsel, Sule & Ülengin, Burç & Aktas, Emel, 2010. "A problem-structuring model for analyzing transportation-environment relationships," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 844-859, February.
    17. Janjevic, Milena & Ndiaye, Alassane, 2017. "Investigating the theoretical cost-relationships of urban consolidation centres for their users," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 98-118.
    18. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2006. "Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2604-2622.
    19. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese & Shucheng Luo & Antonino Sgalambro, 2023. "A game-theoretic multi-stakeholder model for cost allocation in urban consolidation centres," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 663-686, May.
    20. Bjørgen, Astrid & Seter, Hanne & Kristensen, Terje & Pitera, Kelly, 2019. "The potential for coordinated logistics planning at the local level: A Norwegian in-depth study of public and private stakeholders," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 34-41.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:44:y:2015:i:c:p:179-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.