IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ema/worpap/2025-06.html

The Choice of Retaking Competitive Exams

Author

Listed:
  • Fanny Landaud
  • Éric Maurin

    (CY Cergy Paris Université, THEMA)

Abstract

In many countries, access to top science programs is determined by standardized competitive exams. If they fail, candidates are generally allowed to repeat their preparation and retake the exams. Relying on French data, we assess the impact of repetition on repeaters as well as on non-repeaters at the margin of repetition. Both groups appear to benefit equally from repetition, suggesting that students do not self-select into repeating based on their potential progress. Students who choose to repeat are predominantly male and high-income, which contributes to the persistence of significant income and gender gaps in access to top science programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanny Landaud & Éric Maurin, 2025. "The Choice of Retaking Competitive Exams," Thema Working Papers 2025-06, THEMA (Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), CY Cergy-Paris University, ESSEC and CNRS.
    • Handle: RePEc:ema:worpap:2025-06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://thema-cergy.eu/repec/pdf/2025-06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frisancho, Veronica & Krishna, Kala & Lychagin, Sergey & Yavas, Cemile, 2016. "Better luck next time: Learning through retaking," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 120-135.
    2. Thomas Buser & Huaiping Yuan, 2019. "Do Women Give Up Competing More Easily? Evidence from the Lab and the Dutch Math Olympiad," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 225-252, July.
    3. Hogarth, Robin M. & Karelaia, Natalia & Trujillo, Carlos Andrés, 2012. "When should I quit? Gender differences in exiting competitions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 136-150.
    4. Pedro Carneiro & James J. Heckman & Edward Vytlacil, 2010. "Evaluating Marginal Policy Changes and the Average Effect of Treatment for Individuals at the Margin," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 377-394, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dilmaghani, Maryam, 2022. "Chess girls don’t cry: Gender composition of games and effort in competitions among the super-elite," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Fanny Landaud & Eric Maurin, 2020. "Aim High and Persevere! Competitive Pressure and Access Gaps in Top Science Graduate Programs," PSE Working Papers halshs-03065958, HAL.
    3. Nzabonimpa, Mélyne, 2023. "Gender differences in politician persistence and incumbency advantage," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Kyunghoon Ban & D'esir'e K'edagni & Santiago Acerenza, 2021. "Local Average and Marginal Treatment Effects with a Misclassified Treatment," Papers 2105.00358, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    5. Piasenti, Stefano & Valente, Marica & van Veldhuizen, Roel & Pfeifer, Gregor, 2023. "Does Unfairness Hurt Women? The Effects of Losing Unfair Competitions," IZA Discussion Papers 16324, IZA Network @ LISER.
    6. Yan Liu, 2022. "Policy Learning under Endogeneity Using Instrumental Variables," Papers 2206.09883, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    7. Joshua Goodman & Oded Gurantz & Jonathan Smith, 2020. "Take Two! SAT Retaking and College Enrollment Gaps," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 115-158, May.
    8. Grosch, Kerstin & Haeckl, Simone & Kocher , Martin G., 2022. "Closing the gender STEM gap. A large-scale randomized-controlled trial in elementary schools," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2022/4, University of Stavanger.
    9. Oriana Bandiera & Nidhi Parekh & Barbara Petrongolo & Michelle Rao, 2022. "Men are from Mars, and Women Too: A Bayesian Meta‐analysis of Overconfidence Experiments," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(S1), pages 38-70, June.
    10. Sokbae Lee & Bernard Salanié, 2018. "Identifying Effects of Multivalued Treatments," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(6), pages 1939-1963, November.
    11. Bizopoulou, Aspasia & Megalokonomou, Rigissa & Simion, Ştefania, 2024. "Do second chances pay off? Evidence from a natural experiment with low-achieving students," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    12. Rhee, Elaine & Noussair, Charles N., 2022. "Is the gender difference in competitive behavior history dependent?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 44-67.
    13. Moffitt, Robert A. & Zahn, Matthew V., 2022. "The Marginal Labor Supply Disincentives of Welfare: Evidence from Administrative Barriers to Participation," Economics Working Paper Archive 66674, The Johns Hopkins University,Department of Economics.
    14. Yuting Guo & Ying Zhang & Hongfei Ruan & Yi Xiang & Yongzhi Du, 2025. "How do female CEOs affect corporate pay dispersion? The perspective of risk aversion and competition avoidance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 419-433, January.
    15. Brandts, Jordi & El Baroudi, Sabrine & Huber, Stefanie J. & Rott, Christina, 2021. "Gender differences in private and public goal setting," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 222-247.
    16. Johnsen, Åshild A. & Finseraas, Henning & Hanson, Torbjørn & Kotsadam, Andreas, 2026. "Corrigendum to “The malleability of competitive preferences” [Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics Volume 104 (2023) 102015]," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    17. Miklós Antal & Ardjan Gazheli & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, 2012. "Behavioural Foundations of Sustainability Transitions. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 3," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46424.
    18. Pedro Carneiro & Michael Lokshin & Nithin Umapathi, 2017. "Average and Marginal Returns to Upper Secondary Schooling in Indonesia," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 16-36, January.
    19. Gioia, Francesca & Morabito, Leo, 2025. "Behind the Screen: Gender Differences in the Creator Economy," IZA Discussion Papers 17666, IZA Network @ LISER.
    20. Heckman, James J. & Humphries, John Eric & Veramendi, Gregory & Urzua, Sergio, 2014. "Education, Health and Wages," IZA Discussion Papers 8027, IZA Network @ LISER.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ema:worpap:2025-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Collin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/themafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.