IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirpro/2019rp-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact de la modification de la structure tarifaire américaine sur les exportations bioalimentaires québécoises - Partie 1 : Une analyse par le biais des élasticités au commerce

Author

Listed:
  • Lota Tamini
  • Mankan M. Koné
  • Aristide B. Valéa

Abstract

La nouvelle administration américaine s’est retirée du Partenariat Trans Pacifique et a émis sa volonté de revisiter le contenu de l’Accord de libre-échange nord-américain (ALENA). Il s’agit notamment d’obtenir un meilleur accès au marché des partenaires commerciaux (par exemple élargissement des contingents d’importations canadiens dans le secteur laitier) et de protéger certains secteurs de l’économie américaine par de nouvelles politiques commerciale et règlementaire (tarifs douaniers, règles d’origine, refonte de la fiscalité des entreprises…). Les nouvelles politiques commerciale et règlementaire des États-Unis pourraient avoir un impact important sur le commerce international bioalimentaire québécois, les impacts étant différents selon les filières. Afin d’analyser cet impact, une approche méthodologique s’appuyant sur la littérature sur les modèles de gravité est utilisée. Les données couvrent la période allant de 1995 à 2016 et les différentes provinces canadiennes d’une part (exportations) et d’autres parts (importateurs) les États des États-Unis pris individuellement, les pays de l’Union Européenne pris individuellement et les principaux autres partenaires du Québec (Chine, Mexique, Japon, Corée du sud). Les coefficients estimés (prix et tarifs) sont utilisés afin d’évaluer les élasticités au commerce des exportations bioalimentaires québécoises. Les résultats des estimations présentés au Tableau 1 montrent que 4 filières ont des élasticités des tarifs supérieures à l’unité, une hausse de 10% des tarifs se traduisant par une baisse de la valeur du commerce de plus de 10%. Ce sont les filières du sucre et des produits du sucre avec une baisse de 35,44%, bovine avec une baisse de 33,15%, des céréales avec une baisse de 24,77% et des produits oléagineux, huiles et graisses avec une baisse de 17,24%. Lorsque les valeurs moyennes du commerce des années 2014-2016 sont utilisées, la baisse du commerce global est de 8,46%.

Suggested Citation

  • Lota Tamini & Mankan M. Koné & Aristide B. Valéa, 2019. "Impact de la modification de la structure tarifaire américaine sur les exportations bioalimentaires québécoises - Partie 1 : Une analyse par le biais des élasticités au commerce," CIRANO Project Reports 2019rp-02, CIRANO.
    • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2019rp-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2019RP-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lota D. Tamini & Jean-Philippe Gervais & Bruno Larue, 2010. "Trade liberalisation effects on agricultural goods at different processing stages," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 37(4), pages 453-477, December.
    2. Head, Keith & Mayer, Thierry, 2014. "Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook," Handbook of International Economics, in: Gopinath, G. & Helpman, . & Rogoff, K. (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 0, pages 131-195, Elsevier.
    3. Jean Imbs & Isabelle Mejean, 2015. "Elasticity Optimism," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 43-83, July.
    4. Lota D. Tamini & Maurice Doyon & Rodrigue Simon, 2016. "Analyzing Trade Liberalization Effects in the Egg Sector Using a Dynamic Gravity Model," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(2), pages 383-411, June.
    5. A. Colin Cameron & Pravin K. Trivedi, 2010. "Microeconometrics Using Stata, Revised Edition," Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, number musr, March.
    6. Jean Imbs & Isabelle Mejean, 2010. "Trade Elasticities: A Final Report for the European Commission," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 432, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    7. Gopinath, G. & Helpman, . & Rogoff, K. (ed.), 2014. "Handbook of International Economics," Handbook of International Economics, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 4, number 4.
    8. Lota Tamini & Pascal Ghazalian & Jean-Philippe Gervais & Bruno Larue, 2012. "Trade Liberalization in Primary and Processed Agricultural Products: Should Developing Countries Favour Tariff or Domestic Support Reductions?," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 85-107, September.
    9. Pascal L. Ghazalian & Lota D. Tamini & Bruno Larue & Jean-Philippe Gervais, 2012. "A gravity model to account for vertical linkages between markets with an application to the cattle/beef sector," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 579-601, June.
    10. Anderson, James E. & Vesselovsky, Mykyta & Yotov, Yoto V., 2016. "Gravity with scale effects," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 174-193.
    11. Ahsan, Reshad N., 2013. "Input tariffs, speed of contract enforcement, and the productivity of firms in India," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 181-192.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lota Tamini & Mankan M. Koné & Aristide B. Valéa, 2019. "Impact de la modification de la structure tarifaire américaine sur les exportations bioalimentaires québécoises - Partie 2 : Structure du commerce et des investissements directs étrangers des principa," CIRANO Project Reports 2019rp-03, CIRANO.
    2. Fontagné, Lionel & Martin, Philippe & Orefice, Gianluca, 2018. "The international elasticity puzzle is worse than you think," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 115-129.
    3. Krolikowski, Pawel M. & McCallum, Andrew H., 2021. "Goods-market frictions and international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Mayer, Thierry & Steingress, Walter, 2020. "Estimating the effect of exchange rate changes on total exports," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    5. Crozet, Matthieu & Milet, Emmanuel & Mirza, Daniel, 2016. "The impact of domestic regulations on international trade in services: Evidence from firm-level data," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 585-607.
    6. Bas, Maria & Mayer, Thierry & Thoenig, Mathias, 2017. "From micro to macro: Demand, supply, and heterogeneity in the trade elasticity," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-19.
    7. Pascal L. Ghazalian, 2015. "The New Tomato Suspension Agreement: What Are the Implications for Trade Flows?," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(3), pages 359-380, September.
    8. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/3lmdaefcr886ao8sahjmam30ke is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Pascal L. Ghazalian, 2016. "Processed Food Trade of Greece with EU and Non-EU Countries: An Empirical Analysis," International Journal of Food and Beverage Manufacturing and Business Models (IJFBMBM), IGI Global, vol. 1(2), pages 15-30, July.
    10. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7r7b5deua18sgqefn2auv6hpsl is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Philippidis, G. & Resano, H. & Sanjuán, A.I., 2014. "Shifting Armington trade preferences: A re-examination of the Mercosur–EU negotiations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 21-32.
    12. Bajzik, Josef & Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana & Schwarz, Jiri, 2020. "Estimating the Armington elasticity: The importance of study design and publication bias," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    13. Yvan Guillemette & David Turner, 2018. "The Long View: Scenarios for the World Economy to 2060," OECD Economic Policy Papers 22, OECD Publishing.
    14. Pascal L. Ghazalian, 2019. "Canada's beef exports: Border effects and prospects for market access," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 67(1), pages 53-74, March.
    15. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/nki2gcedn93280ns6fslbhdnm is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Chen, Natalie & Juvenal, Luciana, 2022. "Markups, quality, and trade costs," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Patrick Bisciari, 2019. "A survey of the long-term impact of Brexit on the UK and the EU27 economies," Working Paper Research 366, National Bank of Belgium.
    18. Léa Marchal & Clément Nedoncelle, 2019. "Immigrants, occupations and firm export performance," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 1480-1509, November.
    19. D'Ambrosio, Anna & Montresor, Sandro, 2017. "Migration and Trade Ows: New Evidence from Spanish Regions," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201724, University of Turin.
    20. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/lmb2g91ru9ipp4r5ubgh2jjtr is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Agnosteva, Delina E. & Anderson, James E. & Yotov, Yoto V., 2019. "Intra-national trade costs: Assaying regional frictions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 32-50.
    22. Lars Karlsson & Peter Hedberg, 2021. "War and trade in the peaceful century: the impact of interstate wars on bilateral trade flows during the first wave of globalization, 1830–1913," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 74(3), pages 809-830, August.
    23. Fontagné, Lionel & Orefice, Gianluca, 2018. "Let’s try next door: Technical Barriers to Trade and multi-destination firms," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 643-663.
    24. Álvarez, Inmaculada C. & Barbero, Javier & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zofío, José L., 2018. "Does Institutional Quality Matter for Trade? Institutional Conditions in a Sectoral Trade Framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-87.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirpro:2019rp-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.