IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cfe/wpcefa/2009_06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Conceptual Framework of Consumer Food Choice Behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Marreiros

    () (Universidade de Evora, Departamento de Gestão, CEFAGE-UE)

  • Mitchell Ness

    (Faculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering, University of Newcastle)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop a conceptual framework for the analysis of consumer behaviour concerning the evaluation and choice of food products. The paper presents a review of theory on the processes of consumers' decision making and quality perception. Following this review, a theoretical framework is proposed that integrates the models of Engel, Blackwell and Miniard (1995), the main constructs of the Total Food Quality model of Grunert (1997), together with additional constructs and relationships between them, proposed by Zeithaml (1988) and by the authors of the present paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Marreiros & Mitchell Ness, 2009. "A Conceptual Framework of Consumer Food Choice Behaviour," CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 2009_06, University of Evora, CEFAGE-UE (Portugal).
  • Handle: RePEc:cfe:wpcefa:2009_06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cefage.uevora.pt/en/content/download/1715/22411/version/1/file/2009_06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asp, Elaine H., 1999. "Factors affecting food decisions made by individual consumers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2-3), pages 287-294, May.
    2. Lefkoff-Hagius, Roxanne & Mason, Charlotte H, 1993. "Characteristic, Beneficial, and Image Attributes in Consumer Judgments of Similarity and Preference," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 100-110, June.
    3. Hansen, Torben, 2001. "Quality in the marketplace: : A theoretical and empirical investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 203-211, April.
    4. Bettman, James R & Park, C Whan, 1980. "Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 234-248, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer behaviour; Food; Decision-making; Perception; Quality.;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cfe:wpcefa:2009_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angela Pacheco). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/cfevopt.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.