Are Forced Turnovers Good or Bad News?
To gain insights� about� the� quality� of board’s� firing� decisions,� we investigate� abnormal stock returns and operating performance around CEO-turnover announcements in a new hand- collected sample of 208 “clean” turnover events between January 1998 and June 2009. Unlike the� majority� of previous� studies,� we show that� forced turnovers� do not� per se represent� a positive signal to hareholders.� On the contrary, investors seem to critically assess the board’s firing decision by considering the quality of the departing manager.� When an outperforming CEO is dismissed or forced to leave - an event that occurs in as many as 35% of all dismissals in our sample - shareholders disesteem the board’s decision.� This finding is confirmed in multivariate cross-sectional regressions, holds for different time subperiods, and is robust to various event-test specifications and proxies of CEO quality.
|Date of creation:||2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://wwz.unibas.ch
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bsl:wpaper:2011/10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (WWZ)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.