IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae18/277454.html

Export Tax Rebate Policy in Chinese Fishery Sector: Who are the Beneficiaries?

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, X.

Abstract

The export tax rebate policy in Chinese fishery sector is under dispute, as it is claimed that it works as a subsidy for foreign consumers rather than domestic producers. This paper investigates the distribution of benefits of this policy in the fishery sector. We find that the effects of the export tax rebate on domestic producers depend on the relative magnitude of the export supply and import demand elasticities. After applying the best-bet parameter values, simulation results indicate that, although the export tax rebate does improve Chinese producers welfare, foreign consumers capture most of the welfare benefits of this policy (60%-75%). Furthermore, the results imply that the welfare gain for Chinese producers is overestimated if the vertical linkage between the retail and the farm markets is ignored. Acknowledgement : We thank Dr. Henry Kinnucan at Auburn University for his helpful insight about the model. This work was supported by Shandong Social Science Research Project of China [grant number 16BCXJ04].

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, X., 2018. "Export Tax Rebate Policy in Chinese Fishery Sector: Who are the Beneficiaries?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277454, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277454
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277454/files/684.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Hengyun & Rae, Allan N. & Huang, Jikun & Rozelle, Scott, 2004. "Chinese animal product consumption in the 1990s," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(4), pages 1-22.
    2. Chao, Chi-Chur & Chou, W. L. & Yu, Eden S. H., 2001. "Export Duty Rebates and Export Performance: Theory and China's Experience," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 314-326, June.
    3. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    4. Dey, M.M. & Briones, R.M. & Garcia, Y.T. & Nissapa, A. & Rodriguez, U.P. & Talukder, R.K. & Senaratne, A. & Omar, I.H. & Koeshendrajana, S. & Khiem, N.T. & Yew, T.S. & Weimin, M. & Jayakody, D.S. & Ku, 2008. "Strategies and options for increasing and sustaining fisheries and aquaculture production to benefit poorer households in Asia [PDF in letter standard]," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 37960, April.
    5. Alston, Julian M. & James, Jennifer S., 2002. "The incidence of agricultural policy," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 33, pages 1689-1749, Elsevier.
    6. Han, Tong & Cramer, Gail L. & Wahl, Thomas I., 1997. "Rural Household Food Consumption in China: Evidence from the Rural Household Survey," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35797, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Lovell S. Jarvis, 2012. "The welfare implications of Brazil's coffee export price subsidies during the ICA," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 43, pages 19-32, November.
    8. repec:wyi:journl:002196 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Brander, James A. & Spencer, Barbara J., 1985. "Export subsidies and international market share rivalry," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1-2), pages 83-100, February.
    10. Julien Gourdon & Stéphanie Monjon & Sandra Poncet, 2014. "Incomplete VAT rebates to exporters : how do they affect China's export performance?," Working Papers 2014-05, CEPII research center.
    11. Jota Ishikawa & Tomohiro Kuroda, 2007. "Export Subsidies Versus Export Quotas With Incompletely Informed Policy Makers," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 58(1), pages 118-126, March.
    12. Kilkenny, Maureen, 1998. "Transport Costs, the New Economic Geography, and Rural Development," Staff General Research Papers Archive 1201, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1989. "Demand for Farm Output in a Complete System of Demand Functions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(2), pages 241-252.
    14. Chen, Chien-Hsun & Mai, Chao-Cheng & Yu, Hui-Chuan, 2006. "The effect of export tax rebates on export performance: Theory and evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 226-235.
    15. Bruce Gardner, 1983. "Efficient Redistribution through Commodity Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 225-234.
    16. Dey, M.M. & Briones, R.M. & Garcia, Y.T. & Nissapa, A. & Rodriguez, U.P. & Talukder, R.K. & Senaratne, A. & Omar, I.H. & Koeshendrajana, S. & Khiem, N.T. & Yew, T.S. & Weimin, M. & Jayakody, D.S. & Ku, 2008. "Strategies and options for increasing and sustaining fisheries and aquaculture production to benefit poorer households in Asia," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 37959, April.
    17. John Whalley & Li Wang, 2007. "The Unified Enterprise Tax and SOEs in China," NBER Working Papers 12899, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Mai, Chao-cheng & Hwang, Hong, 1987. "Domestic export subsidy and foreign welfare," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 185-188.
    19. Maureen Kilkenny, 1995. "Transport Costs and Rural Development," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 95-wp133, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    20. Chandra, Piyush & Long, Cheryl, 2013. "VAT rebates and export performance in China: Firm-level evidence," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 13-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Xinran & Ge, Wei, . "Who Benefits from the Export Tax Rebate Policy? Evidence from the Chinese Fishery Sector," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 120(2).
    2. L. An & C. Hu & Yong Tan, 2017. "Regional effects of export tax rebate on exporting firms: Evidence from China," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 774-798, September.
    3. Liu, Xuepeng & Shi, Huimin & Ferrantino, Michael, 2016. "Tax evasion through trade intermediation: Evidence from Chinese exporters," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 518-535.
    4. Yan Zhang & Zhuoran Bai & Christopher Findlay, 2024. "Value-added tax reform and service exports: Evidence from China," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 551-573, May.
    5. Eisenbarth, Sabrina, 2017. "Is Chinese trade policy motivated by environmental concerns?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-103.
    6. Wonkyung Lee & Hong Ma & Yuan Xu, 2021. "Export tax rebate and the margins of exports: product-level evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 28(2), pages 386-404, April.
    7. Dean M. Hanink, 2010. "Perspectives on Regional Change: A Review Essay on Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 3-27, March.
    8. Stefan Gruber & Luigi Marattin, 2007. "No Taxation without Infrastructure," Working Paper series 11_07, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    9. Paredes, Dusan & Iturra, Victor, 2012. "Market access and wages: A spatially heterogeneous approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 349-353.
    10. Bin Qiu & Zhijun Yan, 2017. "Market Efficiency, Heterogeneous Trade Costs and Export-Only Firms," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 101-122, February.
    11. Francis Aubert & Bertrand Schmitt, 2008. "Mécanismes économiques à l’œuvre dans les espaces ruraux, conceptions du rural et logiques de l’intervention publique," Post-Print halshs-01485712, HAL.
    12. Jean-Marc Callois, 2006. "Quality labels and rural development : a new economic geography approach," Post-Print hal-01201116, HAL.
    13. Callois, Jean-Marc, 2006. "Quality labels and rural development : a new economic geography approach," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 78.
    14. Lu, Bing & Ma, Hong, 2023. "The “Matthew effect” in rebates: How does VAT rebates allocation affect firm export performance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    15. Ariel Weinberger & Qian Xuefeng & Mahmut Yaşar, 2021. "Export tax rebates and resource misallocation: Evidence from a large developing country," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 1562-1608, November.
    16. Jean-Marc Callois, 2006. "Quality labels and rural development : a new economic geography approach," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 78, pages 31-51.
    17. Liu, Lihua & Cao, Lele & Cao, Yuqiang & Lu, Meiting & Shan, Yaowen, 2024. "VAT credit refunds and firm productivity: Evidence from China's VAT reform," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Mark D. Partridge & Dan S. Rickman, 1998. "Regional Computable General Equilibrium Modeling: A Survey and Critical Appraisal," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 21(3), pages 205-248, December.
    19. Zhang, Xiekui & Gong, Dayong & Huang, Yihan & Li, Yiting, 2024. "The Government's fiscal and taxation policy effect on enterprise productivity: Policy choice and optimal allocation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 28-41.
    20. Bertrand Schmitt & Florence Goffette-Nagot, 2000. "Définir l'espace rural ? De la difficulté d'une définition conceptuelle à la nécessité d'une délimitation statistique," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 257(1), pages 42-55.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.